Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
ReplyCorrespondence

Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: Is It the Same as in Hypercapnic Coma?—Reply

Arnaud W Thille, Damien Contou and Ana Córdoba-Izquierdo on behalf of the authors
Respiratory Care April 2014, 59 (4) e60-e61; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03247
Arnaud W Thille
Réanimation Médicale Hôpital Henri Mondor Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Créteil, France Réanimation Médicale Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers Poitiers, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damien Contou
Réanimation Médicale Hôpital Henri Mondor Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Créteil, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Córdoba-Izquierdo
Réanimation Médicale Hôpital Henri Mondor Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Créteil, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In Reply:

We read with a great interest the comments made by Dr Killen H Briones Claudett concerning adjustments of ventilatory settings during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) to treat subjects with hypercapnic coma. In a recent original article published in the December 2013 issue of Respiratory Care,1 we reported an overall intubation rate of 15% in a cohort of 242 subjects receiving NIV for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure of all origins. After adjustment, acidosis and severe hypoxemia after 1 h of NIV initiation were independently associated with NIV failure, whereas altered consciousness on admission and ventilatory settings had no influence on outcome. Altered consciousness was defined using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS),2 and in all of the subjects who had encephalopathy at admission (defined as RASS < 0), the rate of intubation was only 23% (14/60). However, this rate reached 52% (16/31) in those who were comatose during the first 24 h (defined as Glasgow coma scale ≤ 8). It has already been found that NIV can be successful in subjects with hypercapnic coma, and NIV failure rates of only 20% have been reported.3 It is important to note that patients who succeed with NIV have a faster improvement of consciousness compared with those who need intubation.3 Dr Briones Claudett emphasizes that subjects with altered consciousness may require higher levels of pressure support than those with normal consciousness. To support this, Briones Claudett et al4 recently found a faster recovery from hypercapnic encephalopathy using ventilatory mode with average volume-assured pressure support compared with pressure support ventilation during NIV due to higher levels of ventilatory assistance and larger tidal volumes (VT).

In our cohort, of the 31 subjects who developed hypercapnic coma, 15 were comatose upon admission, and 16 developed coma during the first 24 h while receiving NIV.1 The rate of intubation was only 20% (3/15) in subjects who were comatose at admission, in line with the results found by Díaz et al.3 By contrast, the rate of intubation was 81% (13/16) in those who developed delayed coma during NIV (P = .001). Subjects with hypercapnic coma upon admission had similar VT values compared with other subjects (459 ± 175 vs 469 ± 142 mL, P = .82). However, they received higher pressure support levels (11.9 ± 2.7 vs 9.1 ± 2.5 cm H2O, P = .008), meaning that the level of ventilatory assistance had been correctly adjusted according to our protocol that aims to target predetermined VT. As we used exclusively ICU ventilators, inspiratory positive airway pressure, including pressure support and PEEP, reached 16.5 ± 2.8 cm H2O in subjects who were comatose at admission, a value close to that reported in the abovementioned studies.3,4

We agree that adjustment of an adequate pressure support level is the key setting to reverse hypercapnic coma, and we believe that our good results are due in part to our protocol of adjusting the pressure support level to target a minimal VT, as would average volume-assured pressure support. Altered consciousness at admission does not seem to increase the risk of NIV failure. By contrast, almost all subjects who developed delayed coma needed intubation, whereas their VT values and their pressure support levels adjusted at admission were similar to those of other patients (417 ± 142 vs 471 ± 142 mL, P = .27; 9.1 ± 7.4 vs 9.2 ± 2.6 cm H2O, P = .88). Therefore, NIV failure was probably due to a patient's worsening and/or failure of this treatment and not to inadequate adjustment of ventilatory settings.

Footnotes

  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2014 by Daedalus Enterprises

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Contou D,
    2. Fragnoli C,
    3. Córdoba-Izquierdo A,
    4. Boissier F,
    5. Brun-Buisson C,
    6. Thille AW
    . Noninvasive ventilation for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure: intubation rate in an experienced unit. Respir Care 2013;58(12):2045-2052.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ely EW,
    2. Truman B,
    3. Shintani A,
    4. Thomason JW,
    5. Wheeler AP,
    6. Gordon S,
    7. et al
    . Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). JAMA 2003;289(22):2983-2991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Díaz GG,
    2. Alcaraz AC,
    3. Talavera JC,
    4. Pérez PJ,
    5. Rodriguez AE,
    6. Cordoba FG,
    7. et al
    . Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation to treat hypercapnic coma secondary to respiratory failure. Chest 2005;127(3):952-960.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Briones Claudett KH,
    2. Briones Claudett M,
    3. Chung Sang Wong M,
    4. Nuques Martinez A,
    5. Soto Espinoza R,
    6. Montalvo M,
    7. Esquinas Rodriguez A,
    8. Gonzalez Diaz G,
    9. Grunauer Andrade M
    . Noninvasive mechanical ventilation with average volume assured pressure support (AVAPS) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypercapnic encephalopathy. BMC Pulm Med 2013;13:12
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 59 (4)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 59, Issue 4
1 Apr 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: Is It the Same as in Hypercapnic Coma?—Reply
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: Is It the Same as in Hypercapnic Coma?—Reply
Arnaud W Thille, Damien Contou, Ana Córdoba-Izquierdo
Respiratory Care Apr 2014, 59 (4) e60-e61; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03247

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure: Is It the Same as in Hypercapnic Coma?—Reply
Arnaud W Thille, Damien Contou, Ana Córdoba-Izquierdo
Respiratory Care Apr 2014, 59 (4) e60-e61; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03247
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire