Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
ReplyCorrespondence

Expiratory Rib Cage Compressions to Improve Secretion Clearance During Mechanical Ventilation: Not Only a Matter of Squeezing the Chest—Reply

Fernando S Guimarães, Sara Lucia Silveira de Menezes and Agnaldo J Lopes
Respiratory Care August 2014, 59 (8) e121; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03522
Fernando S Guimarães
Rehabilitation Sciences Master's Program Augusto Motta University Center and School of Physiotherapy Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
PT PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Lucia Silveira de Menezes
Rehabilitation Sciences Master's Program Augusto Motta University Center and School of Physiotherapy Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
PT PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Agnaldo J Lopes
Rehabilitation Sciences Master's Program Augusto Motta University Center and Pedro Ernesto Hospital Rio de Janeiro State University Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

In Reply:

We thank Dr Martí and his colleagues for their comments on our study. The different methods used to investigate the clinical and physiological repercussions of airway clearance techniques make comparison between studies difficult. Animal studies like those from Unoki et al1,2 and Martí et al3 are important to elucidate mechanisms and raise insights into safety and efficacy of clinical studies with human participants. However, compared with animal models, most mechanically ventilated patients are not paralyzed and present with diverse clinical conditions and respiratory mechanics profiles.

The rational of chest physiotherapy is to displace secretions from the periphery to more central airways, where they can be removed by coughing.4 In our study, similar to the forced expiratory technique, we used prolonged strong manual compression aimed at improving the 2-phase gas-liquid flow in lung periphery.4,5 Our results showed that, according to expiratory flow-volume loop monitoring, this maneuver increased not only the peak expiratory flow but also the air flow throughout the entire expiratory phase in most subjects.6 Conversely, because the brief strong expiratory maneuver in the study by Martí et al3 increased the peak expiratory flow, it was considered an exogenous cough.7 Moreover, the increase in mucus displacement velocity in the central airways (trachea) observed in their study is an expected result and does not reflect mobilization of secretions from the lung periphery.

In conceptual terms, a distinction has to be made between any abrupt expiratory manual compressive maneuver, which mimics the attributes of an effective spontaneous cough, and prolonged expiratory rib cage compression as a technique to remove secretions from the lung periphery. The first, also called directed cough or manually assisted cough, consists of “assisting the cough effort with abdominal or thoracic compression during exhalation”4 and has been indicated to improve the peak expiratory flow in patients with weak cough.8,9 Because the hard manual rib cage compressions in the study by Martí et al3 were applied only in the early expiratory phase, we question whether it can be compared with a directed cough maneuver or an exogenous cough.

To date, the literature has not shown any benefit in mobilizing peripheral secretions by rapidly squeezing out air with prolonged strong compressions (manually assisted cough), brief strong manual compressions synchronized with the early expiratory phase (hard manual rib cage compressions), or prolonged strong and slow manual compressions throughout the entire expiration phase (expiratory rib cage compression) in mechanically ventilated patients.

Footnotes

  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2014 by Daedalus Enterprises

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Unoki T,
    2. Mizutani T,
    3. Toyooka H
    . Effects of expiratory rib cage compression and/or prone position on oxygenation and ventilation in mechanically ventilated rabbits with induced atelectasis. Respir Care 2003;48(8):754-762.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Unoki T,
    2. Mizutani T,
    3. Toyooka H
    . Effects of expiratory rib cage compression combined with endotracheal suctioning on gas exchange in mechanically ventilated rabbits with induced atelectasis. Respir Care 2004;49(8):896-901.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Martí JD,
    2. Li Bassi G,
    3. Rigol M,
    4. Saucedo L,
    5. Ranzani OT,
    6. Esperatti M,
    7. et al
    . Effects of manual rib cage compressions on expiratory flow and mucus clearance during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2013;41(3):850-856.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fink JB
    . Forced expiratory technique, directed cough, and autogenic drainage. Respir Care 2007;52(9):1210-1221; discussion 1221-1223.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Van der Schans CP
    . Bronchial mucus transport. Respir Care 2007;52(9):1150-1156; discussion 1156-1158.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Guimarães FS,
    2. Lopes AJ,
    3. Constantino SS,
    4. Lima JC,
    5. Canuto P,
    6. de Menezes SL
    . Expiratory rib cage compression in mechanically ventilated subjects: a randomized crossover trial. Respir Care 2014;59(5):678-685.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Siner JM
    . An exogenous cough. Crit Care Med 2013;41(3):929-930.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bach JR,
    2. Gonçalves MR,
    3. Hon A,
    4. Ishikawa Y,
    5. De Vito EL,
    6. Prado F,
    7. Dominguez ME
    . Changing trends in the management of end-stage neuromuscular respiratory muscle failure: recommendations of an international consensus. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013;92(3):267-277.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ambrosino N,
    2. Carpenè N,
    3. Gherardi M
    . Chronic respiratory care for neuromuscular diseases in adults. Eur Respir J 2009;34(2):444-451.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 59 (8)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 59, Issue 8
1 Aug 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expiratory Rib Cage Compressions to Improve Secretion Clearance During Mechanical Ventilation: Not Only a Matter of Squeezing the Chest—Reply
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Expiratory Rib Cage Compressions to Improve Secretion Clearance During Mechanical Ventilation: Not Only a Matter of Squeezing the Chest—Reply
Fernando S Guimarães, Sara Lucia Silveira de Menezes, Agnaldo J Lopes
Respiratory Care Aug 2014, 59 (8) e121; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03522

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Expiratory Rib Cage Compressions to Improve Secretion Clearance During Mechanical Ventilation: Not Only a Matter of Squeezing the Chest—Reply
Fernando S Guimarães, Sara Lucia Silveira de Menezes, Agnaldo J Lopes
Respiratory Care Aug 2014, 59 (8) e121; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03522
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire