Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Open Forum
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Open Forum
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
ReplyCorrespondence

Endotracheal Tube Holders and the Prone Position: A Cause for Concern–Reply

Daniel F Fisher and Robert M Kacmarek
Respiratory Care February 2015, 60 (2) e42; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03980
Daniel F Fisher
Respiratory Care Services Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M Kacmarek
Department of Anesthesiology Critical Care and Pain Medicine Respiratory Care Services Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In Reply:

We appreciate the comments by Gomaa and Branson concerning their patients who developed pressure sores during prone ventilation and how it relates to the findings of our study.1 The authors are correct that the effects of prone positioning were not evaluated in our study. Prone positioning and facial edema, although both important factors in skin integrity around the airway, were not within the scope of our study. However, data derived from our observations could be used to identify airway-securing devices that had pressure points in the supine position. The Hollister AnchorFast device had an increased reading of force on the right cheekbone area (FS1) during each of the vertical and horizontal rotation phases of our testing. Airway complications are a recognized hazard during prone ventilation.2

Unfortunately, the statement in the first paragraph of the letter that “the increase in pressure exerted by the commercially available devices, which the authors reported as not clinically important” is incorrect. In fact, in the second paragraph of the discussion section, we specifically stated that “the force exerted on the patient's face by many of the commercial securing devices may result in discomfort and formation of pressure ulcers.”1 We discussed that although there was no outlier in all of the factors tested, specific techniques/devices may prove more beneficial in certain circumstances.

We do agree and join with Gomaa and Branson in stressing the importance of therapists being aware of and vigilant in prevention of the development of pressure ulcers not only in the prone patient, but also in all patients who have artificial airways. Assessing skin integrity of all patients with artificial airways should be part of every patient evaluation regardless of the need for mechanical ventilation or prone positioning. Gomaa and Branson's reported experiences only further stress the need for continued evaluation of airway-securing procedures with more sophisticated modeling, as well as clinical observation.

Footnotes

  • Dr Kacmarek has disclosed relationships with Covidien, Hamilton Medical, General Electric, Newport, Dräger, and Maquet. Mr Fisher has disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2015 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fisher DF,
    2. Chenelle CT,
    3. Marchese AD,
    4. Kratohvil JP,
    5. Kacmarek RM
    . Comparison of commercial and noncommercial endotracheal tube-securing devices. Respir Care 2014;59(9):1315–1323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lee JM,
    2. Bae W,
    3. Lee YJ,
    4. Cho YJ
    . The efficacy and safety of prone positional ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: updated study-level meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med 2014;42(5):1252–1262.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 60 (2)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 60, Issue 2
1 Feb 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Monthly Podcast

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Endotracheal Tube Holders and the Prone Position: A Cause for Concern–Reply
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Endotracheal Tube Holders and the Prone Position: A Cause for Concern–Reply
Daniel F Fisher, Robert M Kacmarek
Respiratory Care Feb 2015, 60 (2) e42; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03980

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Endotracheal Tube Holders and the Prone Position: A Cause for Concern–Reply
Daniel F Fisher, Robert M Kacmarek
Respiratory Care Feb 2015, 60 (2) e42; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03980
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire