Evaluation of a Nasal Cannula in Noninvasive Ventilation Using a Lung Simulator

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Khalaf MN,
   2. Brodsky N,
   3. Hurley J,
   4. Bhandari V

   . A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 2001;108(1):13–17.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.
   1. Barrington KJ,
   2. Bull D,
   3. Finer NN

   . Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001;107(4):638–641.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.
   1. Bhandari V,
   2. Gavino RG,
   3. Nedrelow JH,
   4. Pallela P,
   5. Salvador A,
   6. Ehrenkranz RA,
   7. Brodsky NL

   . A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS. J Perinatol 2007;27(11):697–703.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Lemyre B,
   2. Davis PG,
   3. de Paoli AG

   . Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002(1):CD002272.
5. 5.↵
   1. Owen LS,
   2. Morley CJ,
   3. Dawson JA,
   4. Davis PG

   . Effects of non-synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation on spontaneous breathing in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011;96(6):F422–F428.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Moretti C,
   2. Gizzi C,
   3. Papoff P,
   4. Lampariello S,
   5. Capoferri M,
   6. Calcagnini G,
   7. Bucci G

   . Comparing the effects of nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation in very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 1999;56(2-3):167–177.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Lista G,
   2. Castoldi F,
   3. Fontana P,
   4. Daniele I,
   5. Cavigioli F,
   6. Rossi S,
   7. et al

   . Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010;95(2):F85–F89.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Cook SE,
   2. Fedor KL,
   3. Chatburn RL

   . Effects of imposed resistance on tidal volume with 5 neonatal nasal continuous positive airway pressure systems. Respir Care 2010;55(5):544–548.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Volsko TA,
   2. Fedor K,
   3. Amadei J,
   4. Chatburn RL

   . High flow through a nasal cannula and CPAP effect in a simulated infant model. Respir Care 2011;56(12):1893–1900.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Nzegwu NI,
    2. Mack T,
    3. DellaVentura R,
    4. Dunphy L,
    5. Koval N,
    6. Levit O,
    7. Bhandari V

    . Systematic use of the RAM nasal cannula in the Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a quality improvement project. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;1–4.
11. 11.↵
    1. Sivieri EM,
    2. Gerdes JS,
    3. Abbasi S

    . Effect of HFNC flow rate, cannula size, and nares diameter on generated airway pressures: an in vitro study. Pediatr Pulmonol 2013;48(5):506–514.

    OpenUrlPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Bhandari V

    . Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the newborn: review of literature and evidence-based guidelines. J Perinatol 2010;30(8):505–512.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Chang HY,
    2. Claure N,
    3. D'ugard C,
    4. Torres J,
    5. Nwajei P,
    6. Bancalari E

    . Effects of synchronization during nasal ventilation in clinically stable preterm infants. Pediatr Res 2011;69(1):84–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science