Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Open Forum
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Open Forum
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
EditorialEditorials

Endotracheal Tube Cleaning With a Novel Mechanism for Secretion Removal

Lucas AP Cacau, Valter J Santana-Filho and Vitor O Carvalho
Respiratory Care November 2016, 61 (11) 1560-1561; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05216
Lucas AP Cacau
Department of Physical Therapy Tiradentes University Aracaju, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valter J Santana-Filho
Department of Physical Therapy Federal University of Sergipe São Cristóvão, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Vitor O Carvalho
Department of Physical Therapy Federal University of Sergipe São Cristóvão, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The need for invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU results in a search for devices and/or techniques to allow better cleaning of these airways, especially for patients with hypersecretion. It is believed that the common method of tracheal suctioning may have some limitations in the clearance of secretions in the endotracheal tube. The traditional suction catheter may not be able to sweep the entire area of the endotracheal tube, leaving secretions in the lumen, allowing the possibility of colonization by microorganisms.1

Secretions trapped in the endotracheal tube may reduce its internal diameter from as little as 10–15% to its total occlusion. This causes an increase in resistance to air flow,2 work of breathing, patient-ventilator asynchrony, mechanical ventilation duration, and stay in the ICU.3 The American Association for Respiratory Care suggests that the endotracheal suction catheter should occupy <50% of the lumen of the endotracheal tube in children and adults.4 The guidelines also suggest that the vacuum should be set at the lowest level for the aspiration procedure.4

The study by Pinciroli et al5 is very interesting and contributes new information about bronchial hygiene techniques in mechanically ventilated subjects. This randomized clinical trial investigated the use of a device designed to optimize the cleaning of the endotracheal tube. This device is a sterile thin flexible catheter with a cleaner at its distal tip that can be activated. The catheter is first inserted into the endotracheal tube and, when activated, forms a disc-shaped wiper that gently presses on the inner wall of the tube. The catheter is removed over a period of 3–5 s, eliminating secretions by scraping the inner wall of the tube. The authors demonstrated that this device was effective in reducing the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia and in reducing the obstruction of the endotracheal tube, which was assessed by high resolution computed tomography (P = .04).

The device evaluated addresses some issues related to safety, such as graduated markings and an adjustable safety guide to avoid overinflation of the disc and a security lock on the handle preventing unwanted activation. A positive aspect of this study is the assessment by computed tomography scan, which quantified the precise degree of luminal narrowing inside the endotracheal tube. However, other devices designed to optimize the hygiene of the endotracheal tube have already been successfully tested.6–9 These devices6–8 are similar to the one studied by Pinciroli et al5 and consist of catheters with devices on their distal ends for endotracheal tube cleaning. These devices are also safe6,7 and effective to remove secretions.6–10 The difference between the device studied by Pinciroli et al5 and the others6–10 is the added safety, which is relevant for invasive procedures.

The device studied by Pinciroli et al5 has a significant potential for use in clinical practice. However, it is necessary to investigate other important outcomes, such as mortality and cost.11 It is also important to compare this device with other devices available. The penetration of this device into practice might be limited until its cost-effectiveness is known.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Valter J Santana-Filho PhD PT, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Sergipe, Av. Marechal Rondon, n/n. 49100-000, São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil. E-mail: valter.santanafilho{at}gmail.com.
  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • See the Original Study on Page 1431

  • Copyright © 2016 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Gil-Perotin S,
    2. Ramirez P,
    3. Marti V,
    4. Sahuquillo JM,
    5. Gonzalez E,
    6. Calleja I,
    7. et al
    . Implications of endotracheal tube biofilm in ventilator- associated pneumonia response: a state of concept. Crit Care 2012;16(3):R93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Boqué MC,
    2. Gualis B,
    3. Sandiumenge A,
    4. Rello J
    . Endotracheal tube intraluminal diameter narrowing after mechanical ventilation: use of acoustic reflectometry. Intensive Care Med 2004;30(12):2204–2209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mietto C,
    2. Pinciroli R,
    3. Piriyapatsom A,
    4. Thomas JG,
    5. Bry L,
    6. Delaney ML,
    7. et al
    . Tracheal tube obstruction in mechanically ventilated patients assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. Anesthesiology 2014;121(6):1226–1235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    American Association for Respiratory Care. AARC clinical practice guidelines: endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways. Respir Care 2010;55(6):758–764.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Pinciroli R,
    2. Miett C,
    3. Piriyapatsom A,
    4. Chenelle C,
    5. Thomas J,
    6. Pirrone M,
    7. et al
    . Endotracheal tubes cleaned with a novel mechanism for secretion removal: a randomized controlled clinical study. Respir Care 2016;61(11):1431–1439. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04363.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Berra L,
    2. Coppadoro A,
    3. Bittner EA,
    4. Kolobow T,
    5. Laquerriere P,
    6. Pohlmann JR,
    7. et al
    . A clinical assessment of the Mucus Shaver: a device to keep the endotracheal tube free from secretions. Crit Care Med 2012;40(1):119–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Conti G,
    2. Rocco M,
    3. De Blasi RA,
    4. Lappa A,
    5. Antonelli M,
    6. Bufi M,
    7. Gasparetto A
    . A new device to remove obstruction from endotracheal tubes during mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1994;20(8):573–576.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Li Bassi G,
    2. Curto F,
    3. Zanella A,
    4. Stylianou M,
    5. Kolobow T
    . A 72-hour study to test the efficacy and safety of the “Mucus Slurper” in mechanically ventilated sheep. Crit Care Med 2007;35(3):906–911.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Stone RH,
    2. Bricknell SS
    . Experience with a new device for clearing mucus from the endotracheal tube. Respir Care 2011;56(4):520–522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Liu W,
    2. Zuo Z,
    3. Ma R,
    4. Zhang X
    . Effect of mechanical cleaning of endotracheal tubes with sterile urethral catheters to reduce biofilm formation in ventilator patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013;14(7):e338–e343.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bruschettini M,
    2. Zappettini S,
    3. Moja L,
    4. Calevo MG
    . Frequency of endotracheal suctioning for the prevention of respiratory morbidity in ventilated newborns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;(3):CD011493.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 61 (11)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 61, Issue 11
1 Nov 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Endotracheal Tube Cleaning With a Novel Mechanism for Secretion Removal
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Endotracheal Tube Cleaning With a Novel Mechanism for Secretion Removal
Lucas AP Cacau, Valter J Santana-Filho, Vitor O Carvalho
Respiratory Care Nov 2016, 61 (11) 1560-1561; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05216

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Endotracheal Tube Cleaning With a Novel Mechanism for Secretion Removal
Lucas AP Cacau, Valter J Santana-Filho, Vitor O Carvalho
Respiratory Care Nov 2016, 61 (11) 1560-1561; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05216
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire