Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
EditorialEditorials

Configuration of Aerosol Delivery Devices and Their Placement: Let's Be Sure We're Paying Attention to the Literature

Timothy B Op't Holt
Respiratory Care March 2016, 61 (3) 389; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04699
Timothy B Op't Holt
Department of Cardiorespiratory Care University of South Alabama Mobile, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

In this issue of Respiratory Care, Ball and colleagues1 determined the optimal nebulizer configurations and positions for aerosol delivery in vitro with and without CPAP. They determined that with continuous high-flow CPAP, the greatest amount of albuterol delivered to a lung simulator (13.8 ± 4.4%) was when the nebulizer was placed proximal to the lung simulator. Without CPAP, they determined that the greatest amount of albuterol delivered to the lung simulator (9.9 ± 1.1%) was with a T-piece with one extremity closed with a cap. Studies such as this are so important because practitioners may be complacent about the equipment setup and nebulizer position for delivering an aerosol to patients with or without mechanical ventilation, performing this therapy as they were shown by their clinical instructors or others, without regard for the actual aerosol delivery to the airways or outcome of the therapy as determined by careful patient assessment or by review of the literature on this topic. For instance, some practitioners may place the medication nebulizer in-line with a large volume air entrainment nebulizer. Unfortunately, the high flow of gas blows the medicated aerosol through the circuit such that virtually no medication reaches the patient. As therapists, we need to ensure that when we give an aerosol treatment, it's not just because it was ordered, but rather with attention to whether the aerosol actually makes it to the airway, whether it is indicated, and whether we have assessed the patient before and after the treatment to see if it was effective. We have the tools and assessment skills to do this.

We now know as the result of excellent research, both in vitro and in vivo, the correct placement of the nebulizer for spontaneously breathing patients with and without artificial airways,1,2 and we know that a mouthpiece is the preferred interface.2 We know the correct placement of the jet nebulizer3 and vibrating mesh nebulizer3 in patients being mechanically ventilated both invasively and noninvasively,4 and we know the correct type and placement of spacers when we give aerosol via a metered-dose inhaler in patients being ventilated3 or not. Respiratory Care and other publications5 do an excellent job of conveying this information, as do the many speakers at meetings. Let's be sure that therapists who may not take advantage of the current literature are receiving the message and adapting their practice to incorporate this information. It behooves educators, managers, and the therapist at the bedside to make this assurance for the good of the patient.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Timothy B Op't Holt EdD RRT AE-C FAARC, Department of Cardiorespiratory Care, University of South Alabama, 5721 Drive North USA, Mobile, AL 36688-0002. E-mail: toptholt{at}southalabama.edu.
  • Dr Op't Holt has disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • See the Original Study on Page 263

  • Copyright © 2016 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ball L,
    2. Sutherasan Y,
    3. Caratto V,
    4. Sanguineti E,
    5. Marsili M,
    6. Raimondo P,
    7. et al
    . Effect of nebulizer position, gas flow, and CPAP on aerosol bronchodilator delivery: an in vitro study. Respir Care 2016;61(3):263–268.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ari A,
    2. Restrepo RD
    . Aerosol delivery device selection for spontaneously breathing patients: 2012. Respir Care 2012;57(4):613–626.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ari A,
    2. Fink JB,
    3. Dhand R
    . Inhalation therapy in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: an update. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2012;25(6):319–332.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Dhand R
    . Aerosol therapy in patients receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2012;25(2):63–78.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hess DR,
    2. MacIntyre NR,
    3. Galvin WF,
    4. Mishoe SC
    1. Hess DR
    . Humidity and aerosol therapy. In: Hess DR, MacIntyre NR, Galvin WF, Mishoe SC, editors. Respiratory Care: Principles and Practice, 3rd edition, Burlington MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2016:307–351.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 61 (3)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 61, Issue 3
1 Mar 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Configuration of Aerosol Delivery Devices and Their Placement: Let's Be Sure We're Paying Attention to the Literature
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Configuration of Aerosol Delivery Devices and Their Placement: Let's Be Sure We're Paying Attention to the Literature
Timothy B Op't Holt
Respiratory Care Mar 2016, 61 (3) 389; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.04699

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Configuration of Aerosol Delivery Devices and Their Placement: Let's Be Sure We're Paying Attention to the Literature
Timothy B Op't Holt
Respiratory Care Mar 2016, 61 (3) 389; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.04699
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire