Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Article CommentaryEditor's Commentary

Editor's Commentary

Respiratory Care July 2016, 61 (7) i;
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Our Editor's Choice paper examines respiratory ther-apists' (RTs) experiences and attitudes regarding ter-minal extubations and end-of-life care. Grandhige and colleagues surveyed RTs at 2 academic medical centers about their experiences caring for patients with terminal extubations. They found that RTs are rarely involved in end-of-life discussions despite a desire to be, and they experience situations that generate discomfort. Strick-land suggests that integrating content regarding ethical decision-making, end-of-life care, withdrawal of life sup-port, and palliative care not only into the entry-to-prac-tice curriculum, but also into post-graduate continuing education for RTs, as this is vital to improving the RTs' ability to participate and contribute to higher quality care for the patient at the end of life. RT integration into care teams focused on palliative care and end-of-life care, as well as into primary care teams in the ICU, will not only enhance collaboration but also improve patient care.

The purpose of the study by Burnett et al was to in-vestigate the prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoc-onstriction (EIB) by a self-report questionnaire, and the perceived impact of EIB in college athletes. A majority of athletes reported a history or current symptoms relat-ed to EIB or asthma, many were not taking any asthma medication, and they reported concern about EIB ad-versely affecting their sports performance. As pointed out by DeJuilio, signs and symptoms of EIB should be taken seriously, and Burnett and others have shown that this is not always the case. This study supports the need for future educational programs that should include ath-letes, families, trainers, coaches, and teachers.

McConnell et al conducted an observational study to assess the proportion of subjects with an arterial blood gas (ABG) result within 60 min of mechanical ventila-tion initiation. A post-intubation checklist and time out improved the timeliness of mechanical ventilation mon-itoring through more rapid assessment of ABGs. Unfor-tunately, however, there was only moderate adoption of the checklist. The authors propose that implementing this peri-intubation procedure may reduce the risks as-sociated with transitioning to mechanical ventilation. Poon and Kritek suggest that perhaps a simpler checklist needs to be developed. Maybe clinical champions of the checklist need to be identified. The answer to creating and sustaining a program that assures timely completion of routine processes after intubation remains to be found, but we can learn from the experiences of this study.

In their study, Berlinski and Cooper hypothesized that using a soft mist inhaler (SMI) and changing the delivery route from tracheostomy to oronasal will increase lung dose. They found that, in general, an SMI delivers high-er lung dose than a pMDI when using a metallic spacer during oronasal and tracheostomy route with the latter providing higher lung dose.

To develop normal values, Carrillo and colleagues evaluated diaphragm thickness measurements with a two-dimensional B-mode ultrasound at rest in healthy subjects. They found that real time ultrasound of the diaphragm is a simple, inexpensive and portable imaging technique that can provide qualitative anatomical information.

The purpose of the study by Efstathiou et al was to examine the relationship between handgrip strength and maximum inspiratory pressure in healthy young and middle-aged individuals. Their results showed significant correlation between hand flexor force and strength of inspiratory muscles in healthy individuals. This study should be viewed as hypothesis-generating and further studies are required in critically ill or difficult-to-wean patients.

De Vito and colleagues determined the CO2 rebreath-ing response in subjects with late-onset Pompe disease. They found that subjects with late-onset Pompe disease had an impaired hypercapnic respiratory drive response. The clinical impact of this phenomenon in this patient subset warrants further investigation

The aim of the study by Reychler et al was to observe the reproducibility of sputum color identification by dif-ferent categories of health caregivers using a sputum col-or chart. They found that, even if a sputum color chart is a useful tool for the clinician in the context of a clinical deterioration, it presents a non-uniform reliability re-garding the caregivers and their category.

The purpose of the study by Jacobsen and colleagues was to examine socioeconomic variations in use of pre-scription medicines among elderly subjects with COPD. They found that there were no systematic socioeconomic differences in the use of relevant prescription medicines in elderly subjects diagnosed with COPD in hospital set-tings. Their findings do indicate a gap between guideline recommendations and observed use of long-acting bron-chodilators, and thus suboptimal quality-of-treatment in the elderly COPD patient population.

Cystatin C (CysC) is a biomarker of renal function, and an independent risk factor for all-cause and cardio-vascular mortality among elderly persons. The aim of the study by Hu et al was to examine the prognostic role of CysC for mortality of COPD exacerbations. They found that CysC was a strong and independent risk factor for hospital mortality in COPD exacerbations.

The study by Lee and colleagues used the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan to exam-ine the risk factors for tracheostomy in infants with con-genital heart disease (CHD) and to evaluate the associat-ed mortality risk in those who received a tracheostomy. Infants with CHD had an increased risk of undergoing tracheostomy. The mortality risk was significantly in-creased in infants with CHD and tracheostomy, and the risk increases progressively with time.

Tang et al evaluated prognostic factors for acute or-ganophosphorus pesticide poisoning. High 6-h post-ad-mission blood lactate levels, low blood pH, and low post-admission 6-h lactate clearance rates were indepen-dent prognostic factors identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

  • Copyright © 2016 by Daedalus Enterprises
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 61 (7)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 61, Issue 7
1 Jul 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor's Commentary
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor's Commentary
Respiratory Care Jul 2016, 61 (7) i;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Editor's Commentary
Respiratory Care Jul 2016, 61 (7) i;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire