Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Article CommentaryEditor's Commentary

Editor's Commentary

Respiratory Care January 2017, 62 (1) i;
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Our Editor's Choice paper describes a respiratory therapist disease management program for subjects hospitalized with COPD. Silver et al evaluated whether such a program would reduce re-hospitalization and emergency department visits in a prospective, single-center, unblinded, randomized trial. Their program was associated with fewer readmissions, fewer ICU days, and shorter hospital stays due to COPD exacerbations. Derdak points out that this study adds to the growing evidence supporting use of a structured, pre-discharge comprehensive disease-management approach for high-risk patients admitted for COPD exacerbations. Respiratory therapy departments can use this study as an example of how to develop a program to prevent COPD readmissions, improve patient care, and reduce costs.

Itagaki and colleagues conducted a bench study to evaluate the performance of leak compensation in all-age ICU ventilators during volume-targeted neonatal ventilation. They found that only the Puritan-Bennett 980 and the Dräger V500 ventilators acclimated to all leak scenarios to achieve volume-targeted ventilation. The authors suggest that further clinical investigation is needed to validate the use of leak compensation during neonatal volume-targeted ventilation. As pointed out by De Luca et al, these results will help clinicians decide which ventilators best meet their expectations and allow them to minimize the risk of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure.

In a second study by Itagaki and colleagues, the authors conducted a bench study to evaluate the effects of leak compensation on patient-ventilator synchrony during premature/neonatal simulated invasive ventilation and NIV. The ability of leak compensation to prevent asynchrony varied widely between ventilators and lung mechanics. The Puritan-Bennett 980 and the Dräger V500 were the only ventilators able to acclimate to all leak scenarios for invasive ventilation, and PB980 was the only ventilator to acclimate to all leak scenarios in NIV.

Delgado and colleagues evaluated the performance of the new turbine critical care ventilators. They evaluated 7 ICU ventilators with pressure support levels of 10, 15 and 20 cm H2O and with 2 PEEP levels of 5 cm H2O and the minimum level allowed by the ventilator. They found that rate of pressurization and trigger functions were superior in the newest ventilators. The application of PEEP did not change the results.

Apnea of prematurity affects a small proportion, but large absolute number, of late preterm infants. Out-patient management is variably utilized despite relative clinical equipoise and potential for improved cost-effectiveness. Montenegro et al compared in-patient costs for discharge-delaying apnea, bradycardia, and desaturation (ABD) events with hypothetical out-patient management. They found that out-patient management of discharge-delaying ABD events in a late preterm and term population was a cost-effective alternative to prolonged in-patient observation.

The objective of the study by Sauthier and colleagues was to identify how prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) for children and neonates is described in the literature, and to outline pediatric/neonatal considerations related to PMV, with the goal of proposing a pediatric/neonatal adaptation to the definition of the National Association for Medical Direction of Respiratory Care. They propose a definition of pediatric PMV that incorporates the number of consecutive days of mechanical ventilation while taking into account use of NIV, lung maturity, and including short interruptions during the weaning process.

Chau et al review the management of children on long-term mechanical ventilation in Hong Kong over the past 2 decades. Their study showed a steady growth of children on long-term ventilation. These children have distinct demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, comorbidities and outcomes. Home care is feasible for the majority of these children. Prolonged survival of these children suggests the need to enhance transitional care to adult services.

Gowda and colleagues assessed the reliability of a vibrating mesh nebulizer suitable for use during mechanical ventilation. They found that the Aerogen Solo nebulizer was often randomly interrupted with a wide range of retained volumes.

To improve PETCO2 measurement accuracy in a commercially available mask with a mainstream CO2 detector, Napolitano et al implemented design changes with deform-and-hold shaping technology and anterior-posterior adjustment of the expiratory gas flow cup. They found that PETCO2 measurement with the redesigned open-system facemask was accurate in the bench setting. The redesigned facemask maintained a good mask fit and accurate capnographic tracings in the majority of infants and children.

Phillips et al also evaluated techniques for interfacing capnography with supplemental oxygen masks. They evaluated the performance of 2 capnographic oxygen masks against a clinically expedient method using a standard oxygen mask with a flow-directed nasal cannula used for capnography in a spontaneous breathing model of an adult and child under conditions of normal ventilation, hypoventilation, and hyperventilation. Both of the specially designed oxygen-capnography masks provided reasonably stable PETCO2 without significant rebreathing at the commonly used oxygen flows. Because of their open design, PETCO2 measured at high oxygen flows may produce artificially lower readings that may not reflect PaCO2 levels compared to lower oxygen flows.

In a third study related to PETCO2 monitoring during spontaneous breathing, Takaki and colleagues compared the PETCO2 measured using a newly developed oxygen nasal cannula with a CO2-sampling port and PaCO2 in extubated subjects after abdominal surgery. They also investigated whether the difference between PaCO2 and PETCO2 was affected by resting spontaneous breathing with the mouth consciously closed, and deep breathing with the mouth closed. PETCO2 measurements with deep breathing and mouth closed with a capnometry-type oxygen cannula improved the prediction of PaCO2 in surgical subjects without respiratory dysfunction.

The aim of the study by Vianna and colleagues was to compare the effectiveness of hyperoxygenation at 0.2 above baseline FIO2 and hyperoxygenation with 100% oxygen in critically ill subjects on mechanical ventilation. They found that hyper-oxygenation with FIO2 0.2 above baseline prevents hypoxemia. They also found transient changes in ventilation with open circuit suctioning using volumetric capnography analysis.

Chenelle et al conducted a bench evaluation of the performance of the PneuX system, with a comparison to 4 other endotracheal tube cuffs. The PneuX is a dedicated tracheal seal monitor. The PneuX cuff system generally exerted acceptable tracheal wall pressure, but the monitor allowed pressures exceeding 30 cm H2O in some trials. The PneuX was the on ly endotracheal tube to prevent leak in all tests. Leak was reduced by the polyurethane cuff and PEEP, and eliminated by lubrication.

  • Copyright © 2017 by Daedalus Enterprises
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 62 (1)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 62, Issue 1
1 Jan 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor's Commentary
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor's Commentary
Respiratory Care Jan 2017, 62 (1) i;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Editor's Commentary
Respiratory Care Jan 2017, 62 (1) i;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire