Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Computerized Respiratory Sounds: Novel Outcomes for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD

Cristina Jácome and Alda Marques
Respiratory Care February 2017, 62 (2) 199-208; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04987
Cristina Jácome
Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health, and Leisure (CIAFEL), Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal and Lab 3R, Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alda Marques
Lab 3R, Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), Aveiro, Portugal and the Institute for Research in Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Flow chart.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Median frequency (A and B) and mean intensity (C and D) of normal respiratory sounds at 2 frequency bands (100–300 Hz [A and C] and 300–600 Hz [B and D]) at baseline, post-pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), and at 3-month follow-up. Data are presented as mean ± 95% CI. P values are difference from baseline.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Mean number of inspiratory (A) and expiratory (B) crackles at baseline, post-pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), and at 3-month follow-up. Data are presented as mean ± 95% CI. P value is difference from baseline.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Wheeze occupation rate during inspiration (A, n = 12) and expiration (B, n = 17) at baseline, post-pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), and at 3-month follow-up. Data are presented as box and whisker plots with median, interquartile ranges, and 5–95% percentiles. P value is difference from baseline.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Inspiratory and expiratory flow (A), volume (B), and time (C) at baseline, post-pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), and at 3-month follow-up. Data are presented as mean ± 95% CI.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.
  • Table 2.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 62 (2)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 62, Issue 2
1 Feb 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Computerized Respiratory Sounds: Novel Outcomes for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Computerized Respiratory Sounds: Novel Outcomes for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD
Cristina Jácome, Alda Marques
Respiratory Care Feb 2017, 62 (2) 199-208; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.04987

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Computerized Respiratory Sounds: Novel Outcomes for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD
Cristina Jácome, Alda Marques
Respiratory Care Feb 2017, 62 (2) 199-208; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.04987
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • chronic lung disease
  • rehabilitation
  • computerized respiratory sounds

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire