Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

A Shout Instead of a Whisper: Let's Get the Graphics Right

Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory Care February 2017, 62 (2) 256-257; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05378
Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory Therapy Department Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor:

In July of 2013, Mark Siobal and colleagues wrote a paper on volumetric capnography in Respiratory Care.1 In a subsequent letter to the Editor,2 I pointed out an error in their Figure 8. In that figure, the quantity VDalv is represented as the shaded areas between the volume curve and the CO2 axis. Although the vertical axis is labeled simply CO2, there are horizontal lines labeled PaCO2, PACO2, etc, implying that the vertical axis represents pressure. The problem is that if the vertical axis is pressure, then the areas on the graph have the wrong dimensions; they are not volumes. Unfortunately, Mr Siobal failed to heed my advice and, in his most recent paper on the same subject,3 has made the same error 7 more times (Figs. 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 18, and 19; most of which explicitly label the vertical axis as PCO2 in mm Hg). Figure 6 is particularly egregious because its legend says “From reference 106, with permission.” Checking that reference,4 we see it repeatedly shows the vertical axis labeled as Exhaled FCO2 (carbon dioxide fraction), not PCO2, for volumetric CO2 curves.

Here is the significance of the error. The dimensions of any area on an x-y plot are the dimensions of the vertical axis times the dimensions of the horizontal axis. For example, if the y axis has the dimension of length (L) and the x axis also has the dimension of length, then any area on the graph has the dimensions of length squared (L2). Similarly, if the graph was, say, flow versus time, then the area under the flow curve would have units of volume; flow × time (T) = (volume/time) × time = volume, which has dimensions of length cubed (L3). Now, if a volumetric CO2 graph has its vertical axis labeled as PCO2 (a pressure) and its horizontal axis labeled as volume, then any area has units of pressure × volume = (force/area) × volume = (force/L2) × L3 = force × L, which has dimensions of mass (M) × acceleration × distance, or ML2T−2, representing work, not volume.5

The correct labeling for the volumetric CO2 graph shows the fractional concentration of CO2 on the vertical axis (FCO2 not PCO2).6 Area in units of a fraction times volume yields the units of volume, as required. This was illustrated as early as 1948 in a paper by Fowler,7 where the vertical axis is labeled “CO2 concentration” expressed as a fraction. Fletcher et al4 seem to have written the original article describing volumetric CO2 monitoring. They showed several graphs of volume versus fraction of CO2. Tusman et al8 even state explicitly, “The advantage of using fractions of carbon dioxide compared with partial pressure is that each area represents a volume of carbon dioxide, real or theoretical.”

You may think this issue is a trivial matter, not worth mentioning. But if you are a clinician who is struggling with inconsistencies in the literature, a researcher trying to analyze actual raw data, an educator trying to make a simulation with a spreadsheet, or an engineer trying to design software for a monitor, this kind of error could be quite confusing.

Footnotes

  • Mr Chatburn has disclosed relationships with IngMar Medical and DeVilbiss/Drive Medical.

  • Copyright © 2017 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Siobal MS,
    2. Ong H,
    3. Valdes J,
    4. Tang J
    . Calculation of physiologic dead space: comparison of ventilator volumetric capnography to measurements by metabolic analyzer and volumetric CO2 monitor. Respir Care 2013;58(7):1143–1151.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chatburn RL
    . The whisper game. Respir Care 2013;58(11):e157–158.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Siobal MS
    . Monitoring exhaled carbon dioxide. Respir Care 2016;61(10):1397–1416.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fletcher R,
    2. Jonson B,
    3. Cumming G,
    4. Brew J
    . The concept of deadspace with special reference to the single breath test for carbon dioxide. Br J Anaesth 1981;53(1):77–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chatburn RL,
    2. Mireles-Cabodevil E
    . Handbook of Respiratory Care, 3rd edition. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Learning;2011:204–208.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jaffe MB
    . Using the features of the time and volumetric capnogram for classification and prediction. J Clin Monit Comput 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9830-z.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Fowler WS
    . Lung function studies; the respiratory dead space. Am J Physiol 1948;154(3):405–416.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tusman G,
    2. Sipmann FS,
    3. Bohm SH
    . Rationale of dead space measurement by volumetric capnography. Anesth Analg 2012;114(4):866–874.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 62 (2)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 62, Issue 2
1 Feb 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Shout Instead of a Whisper: Let's Get the Graphics Right
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Shout Instead of a Whisper: Let's Get the Graphics Right
Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory Care Feb 2017, 62 (2) 256-257; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05378

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A Shout Instead of a Whisper: Let's Get the Graphics Right
Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory Care Feb 2017, 62 (2) 256-257; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05378
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire