Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Integrative Weaning Index in Elderly ICU Subjects

Leandro M Azeredo, Sérgio N Nemer, Carmen SV Barbas, Jefferson B Caldeira, Rosângela Noé, Bruno L Guimarães and Célia P Caldas
Respiratory Care March 2017, 62 (3) 333-339; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04524
Leandro M Azeredo
Critical Care Department, Hospital da Polícia Militar de Niterói, Rua Martins Torres 245, Santa Rosa, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Sérgio N Nemer
Critical Care Department, Hospital da Polícia Militar de Niterói, Rua Martins Torres 245, Santa Rosa, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
UNIGRANRIO University Post-Graduate Program associated with the Hospital de Clínicas de Niterói. Rua José de Souza Herdy, 1160 Bairro Vinte e Cinco de Agosto, Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carmen SV Barbas
Pulmonary and Critical Care Department, Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, sétimo andar, sala 7079, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jefferson B Caldeira
UNIGRANRIO University Post-Graduate Program associated with the Hospital de Clínicas de Niterói. Rua José de Souza Herdy, 1160 Bairro Vinte e Cinco de Agosto, Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Critical Care Department, Hospital de Clínicas de Niterói, Rua La Salle 12, Centro, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosângela Noé
Biostatistics Department, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruno L Guimarães
Critical Care Department, Hospital de Clínicas de Niterói, Rua La Salle 12, Centro, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Célia P Caldas
Post-Graduate Program, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Avenida Boulevard 28 de Setembro, 77 Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With increasing life expectancy and ICU admission of elderly patients, mechanical ventilation, and weaning trials have increased worldwide.

METHODS: We evaluated a cohort with 479 subjects in the ICU. Patients younger than 18 y, tracheostomized, or with neurologic diseases were excluded, resulting in 331 subjects. Subjects ≥70 y old were considered elderly, whereas those <70 y old were considered non-elderly. Besides the conventional weaning indexes, we evaluated the performance of the integrative weaning index (IWI). The probability of successful weaning was investigated using relative risk and logistic regression. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to calibrate and the C statistic was calculated to evaluate the association between predicted probabilities and observed proportions in the logistic regression model.

RESULTS: Prevalence of successful weaning in the sample was 83.7%. There was no difference in mortality between elderly and non-elderly subjects (P = .16), in days of mechanical ventilation (P = .22) and days of weaning (P = .55). In elderly subjects, the IWI was the only respiratory variable associated with mechanical ventilation weaning in this population (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: The IWI was the independent variable found in weaning of elderly subjects that may contribute to the critical moment of this population in intensive care.

  • mechanical ventilation
  • weaning
  • elderly

Introduction

With advances in several areas of medicine, the number of elderly people has been increasing worldwide.1 Admission of elderly patients with acute respiratory failure to emergency departments is increasingly common,1,2 and it is hard to find an ICU that has no predominance of elderly patients. Among the several causes of acute respiratory failure in the elderly, community-acquired pneumonia is one of the most common.3 In addition, surgical indication for elderly patients4 is often observed, with specific functional implications for this population when admitted to the ICU receiving mechanical ventilation.

Although some studies concluded that age alone cannot represent a strong predictor for mortality, it can determine treatment intensity5 and ICU admission.6,7 Although age has influence on mortality,8 it seems that the severity of acute disease at admission has more effect on mortality in comparison with age alone.1 It seems that there is no consensus about the influence of age on mortality associated with mechanical ventilation.9 However, regarding weaning from mechanical ventilation, it seems that elderly subjects with community-acquired pneumonia are associated with difficult weaning.3

According to the Sixth International Consensus Conference on Intensive Care Medicine,10 patients who meet satisfactory weaning criteria should be considered ready for weaning. To improve the performance of the mechanical ventilator weaning, new indexes11,12 have been proposed and applied to different populations.13

The objective of this study is to evaluate the variables associated with successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in elderly subjects, observing traditional predictors and the integrative weaning index (IWI). For this purpose, we compared the weaning outcome in elderly (≥70 y old) and non-elderly subjects (<70 y old).

QUICK LOOK

Current knowledge

The concern with the high prevalence of elderly patients in ICUs, who frequently require mechanical ventilation, is the high morbidity and mortality factor in this population. However, the association of age with weaning and hospital mortality is unclear, with doubts persisting about its existence, regardless of other risk factors, such as comorbidities, disease severity, and duration of mechanical ventilation.

What this paper contributes to our knowledge

Age did not influence weaning outcome. The integrative weaning index was the only independent variable to predict the success of weaning in a sample of elderly patients. Thus, it may be an important predictor in evaluating weaning in this population.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study, conducted from a database set up for a study of predictors of weaning in 3 general ICUs of the Hospital de Clínicas de Niterói (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). The study was conducted from September 2004 to January 2008, and we performed a second analysis, regarding elderly and non-elderly subjects. It was approved by the ethics committee of Pedro Ernesto University Hospital and registered as an International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial under number 92117906.

Patients younger than 18 y old, with neurological and/or neuromuscular diseases, with <24 h receiving mechanical ventilation, and/or tracheostomized were excluded from the study. Three hundred thirty-one subjects who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for >24 h were included in the study. After that, we separated subjects younger than 70 y old (non-elderly subjects) from those who were ≥70 y old (elderly subjects).

Informed consent was obtained from each subject, whenever possible, or from the subject's next of kin. The ventilators used were the Evita 2 (Dräger, Lübeck, Germany). Discontinuation from mechanical ventilation was attempted when the physician in charge judged that the subject was ready to be weaned, according to the following criteria: the cause for starting mechanical ventilation had been resolved or at least improved; body temperature was <38.5°C; hemoglobin was ≥8 g/dL; and no dose or a minimal dose of vasoactive or sedative drugs was administered. A PaO2 of ≥60 mm Hg or SaO2 of ≥90%, with a FIO2 of ≤0.4 and PEEP of ≤8 cm H2O were other criteria to be met. A spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) was then evaluated by means of a 2-h T-piece.

The static compliance of the respiratory system (CRS) was measured during volume control ventilation through the same method used by Aboussouan et al14 after assessing the digital display of the ventilator to verify the pressure-time curve without inspiratory efforts of the subjects. An inspiratory hold for 0.5–1.0 s was used to measure the compliance. CRS was calculated by dividing the VT by the difference between inspiratory plateau pressure and PEEP. A bedside spirometer (RM121, Ohmeda, Tokyo, Japan) was attached to the expiratory valve of the ventilator to check the expiratory tidal volume measurement before each calculation of CRS.

Before the weaning trial, all subjects were being ventilated in pressure support ventilation 8–10 cm H2O and PEEP 5 cm H2O. Tracheal airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) was measured by the software of the Evita 2, at pressure support 7 cm H2O. The tracheal P0.1 value was obtained from the average of 3 consecutive measurements with intervals of 15 s.15,16

A sample of arterial blood to analyze the SaO2 and the PaO2/FIO2 was collected at pressure support 7 cm H2O, PEEP 5 cm H2O, and FIO2 0.35. During the first minute after discontinuation from mechanical ventilation, spontaneous minute volume and respiratory rate were measured with a bedside spirometer (RM121, Ohmeda) attached to the airway. The spontaneous VT was calculated by dividing minute volume by breathing frequency (f), and the f/VT ratio was calculated by dividing f by VT (in L).17

The indexes were measured by the respiratory physiotherapists before the SBTs. The decision to return to mechanical ventilation was made by the physician in charge, who was completely blind to the study and to the results of the indexes evaluated, based on the signs of poor tolerance incorporated into our daily routine.

Weaning was considered successful if spontaneous breathing was sustained for >48 h after extubation.10 During the 2-h period of SBT, tolerance was continuously evaluated by the physician in charge. When the patient remained stable after the 2-h period of SBT, the endotracheal tube was removed.

The trial was stopped when at least one of the following poor tolerance criteria was present: SaO2 <90% and PaO2 <60 mm Hg with FIO2 <0.5, or SaO2 <88% and PaO2 <55 mm Hg with FIO2 <0.5 in subjects with COPD; PaCO2 >50 mm Hg (or increased by ≥8 mm Hg in subjects with COPD); arterial pH of ≤7.33 or decreased by ≥0.07; f >38 breaths/min or increased by 50% for ≥5 min; heart rate of >140 beats/min or a sustained increase or decrease of >20%; systolic blood pressure of >180 mm Hg or <90 mm Hg; or in the presence of agitation, diaphoresis, disorientation, or depressed mental status. A clearly audible cough and adequate mental status were requirements for subjects to be considered ready for extubation.18

Weaning failure was determined if one of the following criteria occurred: failed SBT; re-intubation and/or resumption of ventilator support within 48 h following successful extubation; or death within 48 h following extubation.10 Patients who died within 48 h after extubation were previously returned to the ventilator and were not terminally weaned. The distinction between weaning failure (inability to tolerate spontaneous breathing without ventilatory support) and extubation failure (inability to tolerate removal of the translaryngeal tube) was taken into account,18 although for results and statistical analysis considerations, all extubation failures were also regarded as weaning failures.

To evaluate the predictive performance of IWI, we compared it with the f/VT ratio, which was shown to be the most accurate predictor of failure and success in weaning from mechanical ventilation in the study by Yang and Tobin.17 We also compared the IWI with the following parameters: PaO2/FIO2, which represents an important index to evaluate oxygenation; tracheal P0.1, which is an estimate of neuromuscular drive and is considered to be an important indicator of successful weaning, mainly in subjects with COPD15; and the product of tracheal P0.1 and f/VT ratio (P0.1 × f/VT), which has shown more specificity compared with its components,16 beyond f, VT, and CRS.

The IWI uses 3 essential parameters that lend themselves to easy measurement and are independent of the subjects' cooperation. It evaluates, in a single equation, respiratory mechanics, oxygenation, and respiratory pattern, through CRS, SaO2, and f/VT, respectively, IWI = CRS × SaO2/(f/VT).

Because we evaluated exactly the same subjects analyzed in the study of Nemer et al11 and adopted a threshold value according to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the cutoff point of the IWI index calculated for successful weaning in the range ≥70 y and in the range <70 y is better than or equal to 25.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were analyzed by the chi-square test. Numeric variables were analyzed by the Student t test. The chances of successful weaning were investigated using relative risk and logistic regression. The process of the selection factor logistic regression was at 5%. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to calibrate and the C statistic was calculated to evaluate the association between predicted probabilities and observed proportions in the logistic regression model. P values of <.05 were considered significant. The statistical analysis was performed using the SAS 9.0 software package (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

Results

During the evaluation period, 479 patients received mechanical ventilation in our ICUs. After applying the exclusion criteria, 331 subjects who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for >24 h were included in the study, whereas the remaining 148 were not (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Flow chart.

Among the 331 evaluated subjects, we found 155 elderly subjects and 176 non-elderly. In the total population, weaning failure was observed in 54 (16.3%), and mortality in 17 of 331 subjects (5.1%, including 10 re-intubated subjects; 4 died in-hospital). The etiology of acute respiratory failure, with its respective percentage regarding the population, is described in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Etiology and Population

The prevalence of successful weaning in the total population was 83.7%. There was no difference in prevalence of successful weaning between elderly and non-elderly subjects (86.4% vs 80.7%, P = .16). On the other hand, APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) score and mortality were higher in elderly subjects (16.9 ± 5.8 vs 15.3 ± 5.2, P = .009; 9.7% vs 1.1%, P = .002).

There was no difference between elderly and non-elderly subjects regarding days receiving mechanical ventilation (9.2 ± 8.6 d vs 9.1 ± 6.7 d, P = .22). There was also no difference in the weaning duration between elderly and non-elderly subjects (2.8 ± 2.6 d vs 2.6 ± 2.0 d, P = .55). The analysis of the outcome variables by sample and age is described in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Analysis of the Outcome Categorical Variables by Sample and by Age

In the group with age range ≥70 y, the quality indicators were: sensitivity 97.6% (CI 94.9–100%), specificity 96.7% (CI 90.2–100%), positive predictive value 99.2% (CI 97.6–100%), negative predictive value 90.6% (CI 80.5–100%), accuracy 97.4% (CI 94.9–99.9%), positive likelihood ratio 29.3%, and negative likelihood ratio 0.02%. In the group with age range <70 y, the quality indicators were: sensitivity 96.1% (CI 93.0–99.1%), specificity 91.7% (CI 80.6–100%), positive predictive value 98.6% (CI 96.8–100%), negative predictive value 78.6% (CI 63.4–93.8%), accuracy 95.5% (CI 92.4–98.5%), positive likelihood ratio 11.5%, and negative likelihood ratio 0.04%.

The IWI presented the highest relative risk for successful weaning among the analyzed variables in the 2 samples (elderly and non-elderly subjects): 10.6 and 4.60, respectively. The analysis of the respiratory variables according to the results by age is described in Table 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Analysis of the Respiratory Variables According to the Results by Age

Simultaneously analyzing the variables in the elderly population, according to the logistic regression, we found that only an IWI of ≥25 (P < .001) was significant for predicting weaning success of the elderly (Table 4). Analyzing the variables simultaneously, according to the logistic regression, in the non-elderly population, it was observed that an IWI of ≥25 (P < .001) and APACHE II score of ≤17 (P = .003) were significant in predicting success in this population. The other variables showed no independent contribution, at the level of 5%, in predicting a successful response in the study population (Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4.

Logistic Regression to the Success of Weaning by Age

The IWI presented a high predictive value (97.2%) in the elderly population, with a CI ranging from 91.2 to 99.1%. However, combined with the APACHE II, this range decreases significantly, expressing greater confidence. Therefore, we can say that the IWI is an essential predictor of weaning in the elderly population (Table 5).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 5.

Estimated Probability of Success According to the Logistic Model by Age Group

Discussion

In an observational study, Nemer et al11 evaluated a new IWI. In this study, threshold values were determined in 115 subjects and then prospectively validated in an additional 216 subjects. The IWI was the most accurate weaning predictor, followed by the f/VT ratio.11 Our study analyzed the IWI and predictive performance in elderly subjects because they represent the majority of ICU admissions1,2,6,7,17–19 and may be at a high risk of mortality.9,17

In a multi-center, prospective, cohort study performed in Brazil, a total of 773 adult subjects were admitted to 45 ICUs.9 Age, comorbidities, associated organ failure, and ARDS, among other factors, were associated with hospital mortality.8 Survivors were younger than non-survivors (mean age 58 vs 69 y old, P < .001).8 The epidemiological study of Walden et al19 evaluated 1,166 subjects admitted to 102 ICUs across 19 countries. Subjects older than 64 y of age accounted for >50% of cases.19 The study of Quintana et al20 evaluated 2,487 subjects with COPD admitted to the emergency department. Age was highly associated with mortality and admission to the ICU and emergency department, whereas the mean age was >72 y.20

Although the mean age of the evaluated subjects in our study was >64 y, there was not a prevalence of elderly subjects; in fact, without including the 11 multiple trauma patients, who were non-elderly, we found exactly 50% each of elderly and non-elderly subjects, and we did not find a significant difference between successful and unsuccessful weaning or in days of mechanical ventilation between elderly and non-elderly subjects. However, we observed a significant difference regarding mortality, which was higher in elderly subjects (9.7% vs 1.1%, P = .002).

Clinical judgment is not enough to predict weaning outcome accurately (50% positive predictive value and 67% negative predictive value).19,21 Although the SBT presents a positive weaning predictive value of 85%,19 15% of the patients who can complete an SBT require re-intubation in the following 48 h after extubation. This indicates that there are patients who tolerate short SBTs but not longer ones. Although research has shown the SBT has provided significant predictive value for weaning from mechanical ventilation, there is still a portion of patients for which it fails. In the study by Frutos-Vivar et al22 extubation failure occurred in 121 of the 900 subjects (13.4%) who completed the SBT.

Among the routinely measured clinical variables, f/VT ratio, positive fluid balance 24 h before extubation, and the presence of pneumonia at the beginning of mechanical ventilation were found to be the best predictors of extubation failure.22 This fact reinforces the hypothesis that not only the clinical evaluation but also the evaluation of weaning indexes (such as the IWI and f/VT ratio) can be helpful. Weaning indexes that evaluate one single function have generally presented poor accuracy.17,23

On the other hand, the IWI, which can evaluate multiple essential functions, such as f/VT, compliance of the respiratory system, and oxygenation, presented higher predictive performance in a general population in the study of Nemer et al11 and in the current study too. The IWI has been cited in several review studies,11,24–27 described as highly accurate,11,25,26 and recommended by the Brazilian guidelines on mechanical ventilation.24 Besides these advantages, the IWI can be measured regardless of the subject's cooperation.11 According to the logistic regression in the total sample, only the IWI (≥25, P < .001) and the APACHE II (≤17, P = .003) were found to be independent predictors of success in weaning. In elderly subjects, only the IWI independently predicted successful weaning accurately (P < .001).

The main limitations of the study are as follows. Although CRS can be measured during discontinuation from mechanical ventilation,14,17 this not always an easy task to perform during the weaning process, because the patient's inspiratory effort during an assisted breath may interfere with the inspiratory plateau pressure measurement. In our study, we minimized this limitation by observing the digital display of the pressure-time inspiratory plateau curve, thus avoiding respiratory cycles that revealed clear inspiratory efforts of the subjects.

In our study, the IWI was measured with a fixed FIO2 of 35% to avoid variations in SaO2 due to FIO2 variations, only to standardize the study protocol. Further studies must be performed to test the IWI accuracy in a wider range of FIO2 values, but we believe that the IWI can be measured with any FIO2 value <40–50%.

The measurement of the tracheal P0.1 can be a limitation of the study because P0.1 is traditionally measured through an esophageal balloon. However, tracheal P0.1 can be accurately measured at bedside25 through a new generation of software coupled to microprocessor mechanical ventilators, thus being an easier way to assess P0.1 than the esophageal balloon technique.

This was a single-center study. Whether the results can be generalized to other ICUs is still to be determined.

Conclusions

Satisfactory oxygenation, CRS, and breathing pattern, reflected by the IWI ≥25, generally lead to successful weaning in elderly subjects. A large majority of the ICU population is composed of elderly patients, and the IWI, which had previously shown high accuracy in a general population, now demonstrates strong accuracy in elderly subjects as well.

The IWI was the only independent variable found in the weaning of elderly subjects that is able to contribute to the critical moment of this population in intensive care. We believe that the IWI may be the most accurate index to predict weaning outcome.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Leandro M Azeredo PT MSc, Critical Care Department, Hospital da Polícia Militar de Niterói, Rua Martins Torres 245, Santa Rosa, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, CEP: 24240-705, Brazil. E-mail: azeredo.lm{at}gmail.com.
  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2017 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Roch A,
    2. Wiramus S,
    3. Pauly V,
    4. Forel JM,
    5. Guervilly C,
    6. Gainnier M,
    7. Papazian L
    . Long-term outcome in medical patients aged 80 or over following admission to an intensive care unit. Critical Care 2011;15(1):R36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Delerme S,
    2. Ray P
    . Acute respiratory failure in the elderly: diagnosis and prognosis. Age Ageing 2008;37(3):251–257.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Fujii M
    . Factors influencing weaning from mechanical ventilation in elderly patients with severe pneumonia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2012(2);12:277–283.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Niemeyer-Guimarães M,
    2. Condoroglo MS,
    3. Almada-Filho CM
    . Course of functional status in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: 6-month follow up. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016;16(6):737–746.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Boumendil A,
    2. Somme D,
    3. Garrouste-Orgeas M,
    4. Guidet B
    . Should elderly patients be admitted to the intensive care unit? Intensive Care Med 2007;33(7):1252–1262.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Boumendil A,
    2. Aegerter P,
    3. Guidet B
    . Treatment intensity and outcome of patients aged 80 and older in intensive care units: a multicenter matched-cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53(1):88–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Garrouste-Orgeas M,
    2. Timsit JF,
    3. Montuclard L,
    4. Colvez A,
    5. Gattolliat O,
    6. Philippart F,
    7. et al
    . Decision-making process, outcome and 1-year quality of life of octogenarians referred for intensive care unit admission. Intensive Care Med 2006;32(7):1045–1051.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Garrouste-Orgeas M,
    2. Boumendil A,
    3. Pateron D,
    4. Aergerter P,
    5. Somme D,
    6. Simon T,
    7. et al
    . Selection of intensive care unit admission criteria for patients aged 80 years and over and compliance of emergency and intensive care unit physicians with the selected criteria: an observational, multicenter, prospective study. Crit Care Med 2009;37(11):2919–2928.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Azevedo LCP,
    2. Park M,
    3. Salluh JIF,
    4. Rea-Neto A,
    5. Souza-Dantas VC,
    6. Varaschin P,
    7. Oliveira MC,
    8. et al
    . Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Crit Care 2013;17(2):R63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Boles JM,
    2. Bion J,
    3. Connors A,
    4. Herridge M,
    5. Marsh B,
    6. Melot C,
    7. et al
    . Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 2007;29(5):1033–1056.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Nemer SN,
    2. Barbas CSV,
    3. Caldeira JB,
    4. Cárias TH,
    5. Santos RG,
    6. Almeida LC,
    7. et al
    . A new integrative weaning index of discontinuation from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2009;13(5):R152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. de Souza LC,
    2. Guimarães FS,
    3. Lugon JR
    . Evaluation of a new index of mechanical ventilation weaning: the timed inspiratory effort. J Intensive Care Med 2015;30(1):37–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. de Souza LC,
    2. Guimarães FS,
    3. Lugon JR
    . The timed inspiratory effort: a promising index of mechanical ventilation weaning for patients with neurologic or neuromuscular diseases. Respir Care 2015;60(2):231–238.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Aboussouan LS,
    2. Lattin CD,
    3. Anne VV
    . Determinants of time-to-weaning in a specialized respiratory care unit. Chest 2005;128(5):3117–3126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Sassoon CS,
    2. Te TT,
    3. Mahutte CK,
    4. Light RW
    . Airway occlusion pressure. An important indicator for successful weaning in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;135(1):107–113.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sassoon CS,
    2. Mahutte CK
    . Airway occlusion pressure and breathing pattern as predictors of weaning outcome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148(4 Pt 1):860–866.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yang KL,
    2. Tobin MJ
    . A prospective study of indexes predicting the outcome of trials of weaning from mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 1991;324(21):1445–1450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Epstein SK
    . Decision to extubate. Intensive Care Med 2002;28(5):535–546.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Walden AP,
    2. Clarke GM,
    3. McKechnie S,
    4. Hutton P,
    5. Gordon AC,
    6. Rello J,
    7. et al
    . Patients with community acquired pneumonia admitted to European intensive care units: an epidemiological survey of the Genosept cohort. Crit Care 2014;18(2):R58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Quintana JM,
    2. Esteban C,
    3. Unzurrunzaga A,
    4. Garcia-Gutierrez S,
    5. Gonzalez N,
    6. Barrio I,
    7. et al
    . Predictive score for mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations attending hospital emergency department. BMC Med 2014;12:66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Garland A,
    2. Olafson K,
    3. Ramsey CD,
    4. Yogendran M,
    5. Fransoo R
    . Epidemiology of critically patients in intensive care units: a population-based observational study. Crit Care 2013;17(5):R212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Frutos-Vivar F,
    2. Ferguson ND,
    3. Esteban A,
    4. Epstein SK,
    5. Arabi Y,
    6. Apezteguía C,
    7. et al
    . Risk factors for extubation failure in patients following a successful spontaneous breathing trial. Chest 2006;130(6):1664–1671.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Nemer SN,
    2. Barbas CSV,
    3. Caldeira JB,
    4. Guimarães B,
    5. Azeredo LM,
    6. Gago R,
    7. Souza PC
    . Evaluation of maximal inspiratory pressure, tracheal occlusion pressure and its ratio in the weaning outcome. J Crit Care 2009;24(3):441–446.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Brazilian Association of Critical Care Medicine and Brazilian Society of Pneumology and Tisiology. Brazilian recommendations of mechanical ventilation 2013 part 2. J Bras Pneumol 2014;40(5):458–486.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Nemer SN,
    2. Barbas CSV
    . Predicting parameters for weaning from mechanical ventilation. J Bras Pneumol 2011;37(5):669–679.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. El-Baradey GF,
    2. El-Shmaa NS,
    3. Ganna SA
    . Can integrative weaning index be a routine predictor for weaning success? Indian J Crit Care Med 2015;19(12):703–707.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Govil D,
    2. Gupta S
    . Integrative weaning index: new kids on the block. Indian J Crit Care Med 2015;19(12):701–702.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 62 (3)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 62, Issue 3
1 Mar 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Integrative Weaning Index in Elderly ICU Subjects
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Integrative Weaning Index in Elderly ICU Subjects
Leandro M Azeredo, Sérgio N Nemer, Carmen SV Barbas, Jefferson B Caldeira, Rosângela Noé, Bruno L Guimarães, Célia P Caldas
Respiratory Care Mar 2017, 62 (3) 333-339; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.04524

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Integrative Weaning Index in Elderly ICU Subjects
Leandro M Azeredo, Sérgio N Nemer, Carmen SV Barbas, Jefferson B Caldeira, Rosângela Noé, Bruno L Guimarães, Célia P Caldas
Respiratory Care Mar 2017, 62 (3) 333-339; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.04524
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • mechanical ventilation
  • weaning
  • elderly

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire