Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
LetterCorrespondence

Preoxygenation With High-Flow Nasal Cannula: Benefits of Its Extended Use During the Process of Intubation

Igor Barjaktarevic, Antonio M Esquinas, James Johannes and David A Berlin
Respiratory Care March 2017, 62 (3) 390; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05125
Igor Barjaktarevic
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine UCLA Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio M Esquinas
Intensive Care Unit Hospital Morales Meseguer Murcia, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Johannes
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine UCLA Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A Berlin
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College Cornell University New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To the Editor:

We applaud Simon et al1 for the study published in Respiratory Care comparing high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and bag-valve-mask ventilation. However, we would like to emphasize several points.

First, a significant increase in SpO2 after preoxygenation with HFNC was seen only in the subgroup of subjects previously receiving low-flow oxygen and not in subjects previously receiving noninvasive ventilation or HFNC. The absence of improved SpO2 with HFNC preoxygenation may lead to the wrong conclusion that HFNC preoxygenation is effective only in a certain type of patients. As the authors have briefly discussed, patients previously treated with HFNC and noninvasive ventilation have already had improved lung recruitment related to increased PEEP, and simply the absence of significant desaturation during the apnea phase of intubation already proves a beneficial role of HFNC as a preoxygenation method.

Second, the lack of more significant impact of HFNC in preoxygenation was explained by the lack of ability of subjects to keep the mouth closed during the delivery of high-flow oxygen. This observation led to the conclusion that HFNC may not be adequate for severely hypoxemic patients requiring intubation. The fact is that the authors did not evaluate this “open-mouth factor” and reduction in the level of positive pressure with any objective measurement, so it is impossible to know the relevance of this factor.2

Last, the authors report that there was no significant desaturation during apnea phase before intubation in the HFNC group, as opposed to the bag-valve-mask group. This finding suggests HFNC as a favorable method for preoxygenation. Analyzing the relevance of this finding, it is important to note that subjects in the HFNC group were maintained on HFNC oxygen support after the preoxygenation period and throughout endotracheal intubation. HFNC offers several benefits in management of respiratory failure during preoxygenation and also throughout the process of endotracheal intubation itself. HFNC offers continuous delivery of high FIO2, which can help gas exchange and promote apneic oxygenation but also provides a low PEEP effect on alveolar recruitment and upper-airway splinting.3 Given the utility of HFNC for treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure with benefits in prevention of the intubation rate in certain patients4 and for prevention of failure of extubation,5 it is already evident that HFNC has become a well-recognized part of the preoxygenation strategy in acute respiratory failure requiring transition to mechanical ventilation. As opposed to other oxygen-delivery methods strictly limited to the preoxygenation process but not maintainable throughout the process of intubation itself (non-rebreathing mask, face mask noninvasive ventilation, bag-valve-mask), HFNC use can be extended through the whole process and all stages of endotracheal intubation. Based on the concept applied in the study of Simon et al,1 we propose here that future studies focus on HFNC not only as a preoxygenation method but rather as complete preintubation oxygenation support that encompasses continuous usage of HFNC before and throughout endotracheal intubation. We have previously explored such a concept in a small case series where we tested HFNC6 or nasal noninvasive ventilation7 as preoxygenation and during-intubation support; both techniques have shown promising results.

Footnotes

  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2017 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Simon M,
    2. Wachs C,
    3. Braune S,
    4. de Heer G,
    5. Frings D,
    6. Kluge S
    . High-flow nasal cannula versus bag-valve-mask for preoxygenation before intubation in subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Respir Care 2016;61(9):1160–1167.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Parke R,
    2. McGuinness S,
    3. Eccleston M
    . Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure. Br J Anaesth 2009;103(6):886–890.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Esquinas AM,
    2. Berlin DA,
    3. Barjaktarevic I
    . Oxygenation during high-flow nasal cannula in tracheal intubation: do we know the “red desaturation line”? Crit Care Med 2015;43(6):e215–e216.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Frat JP,
    2. Thille AW,
    3. Mercat A,
    4. Girault C,
    5. Ragot S,
    6. Perbet S,
    7. et al
    . High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2015;372(23):2185–2196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hernández G,
    2. Vaquero C,
    3. González P,
    4. Subira C,
    5. Frutos-Vivar F,
    6. Rialp G,
    7. et al
    . Effect of postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on reintubation in low-risk patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(13):1354–1361.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Berlin D,
    2. Singh I,
    3. Barjaktarevic I,
    4. Friedman O
    . A technique for bronchoscopic intubation during high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. J Intensive Care Med 2016;31(3):213–215.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Barjaktarevic I,
    2. Berlin D
    . Bronchoscopic intubation during continuous nasal positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure. J Intensive Care Med 2015;30(3):161–166.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 62 (3)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 62, Issue 3
1 Mar 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preoxygenation With High-Flow Nasal Cannula: Benefits of Its Extended Use During the Process of Intubation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Preoxygenation With High-Flow Nasal Cannula: Benefits of Its Extended Use During the Process of Intubation
Igor Barjaktarevic, Antonio M Esquinas, James Johannes, David A Berlin
Respiratory Care Mar 2017, 62 (3) 390; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05125

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Preoxygenation With High-Flow Nasal Cannula: Benefits of Its Extended Use During the Process of Intubation
Igor Barjaktarevic, Antonio M Esquinas, James Johannes, David A Berlin
Respiratory Care Mar 2017, 62 (3) 390; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05125
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire