Pressures and Oscillation Frequencies Generated by Bubble-Positive Expiratory Pressure Devices

References

1. 1.↵
   1. O'Neill B,
   2. Bradley JM,
   3. McArdle N,
   4. MacMahon J

   . The current physiotherapy management of patients with bronchiectasis: a UK survey. Int J Clin Pract 2002;56(1):34–35.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.
   1. Lee A,
   2. Button B,
   3. Denehy L

   . Current Australian and New Zealand physiotherapy practice in the management of patients with bronchiectasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NZ J Physiother 2008;36(2):49–58.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Johnston CL,
   2. James R,
   3. Mackney JH

   . The current use of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy by public hospital physiotherapists in New South Wales. N Z J Physiother 2013;41(3) 88–93.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   1. Oberwaldner B,
   2. Evans JC,
   3. Zach MS

   . Forced expirations against a variable resistance: a new chest physiotherapy method in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 1986;2(6):358–367.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Andersen JB,
   2. Qvist J,
   3. Kann T

   . Recruiting collapsed lung through collateral channels with positive end-expiratory pressure. Scand J Respir Dis 1979;60(5):260–266.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Groth S,
   2. Stafanger G,
   3. Dirksen H,
   4. Andersen JB,
   5. Falk M,
   6. Kelstrup M

   . Positive expiratory pressure (PEP-mask) physiotherapy improves ventilation and reduces volume of trapped gas in cystic fibrosis. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1985;21(4):339–343.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Sehlin M,
   2. Ohberg F,
   3. Johansson G,
   4. Winsö O

   . Physiological responses to positive expiratory pressure breathing: a comparison of the PEP bottle and the PEP mask. Respir Care 2007;52(8):1000–1005.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Mestriner RG,
   2. Fernandes RO,
   3. Steffen LC,
   4. and Donadio MVF

   . Optimum design parameters for a therapist-constructed positive-expiratory-pressure therapy bottle device. Respir Care 2009;54(4):504–508.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Santos MD,
   2. Milross MA,
   3. Alison JA

   . Therapist-made bubble-positive expiratory pressure: a survey of physiotherapists in Australia. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J 2016;27:3–10.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Volsko TA,
    2. DiFiore J,
    3. Chatburn RL

    . Performance comparison of two oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices: acapella versus flutter. Respir Care 2003;48(2):124–130.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. McCarren B,
    2. Alison JA

    . Physiological effects of vibration in subjects with cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2006;27(6):1204–1209.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Mueller G,
    2. Bersch-Porada I,
    3. Koch-Borner S,
    4. Raab AM,
    5. Jonker M,
    6. Baumberger M,
    7. Michel F

    . Laboratory evaluation of four different devices for secretion mobilization: acapella choice, green and blue versus water bottle. Respir Care 2014;59(5):673–677.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Chilvers MA,
    2. O'Callaghan C

    . Analysis of ciliary beat pattern and beat frequency using digital high speed imaging: a comparison with the photomultiplier and photodiode methods. Thorax 2000;55(4):314–317.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. King M,
    2. Phillips DM,
    3. Gross D,
    4. Vartian V,
    5. Chang HK,
    6. Zidulka A

    . Enhanced tracheal mucus clearance with high frequency chest wall compression. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;128(3):511–515.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. App EM,
    2. Kieselmann R,
    3. Reinhardt D,
    4. Lindemann H,
    5. Dasgupta B,
    6. King M,
    7. Brand P

    . Sputum rheology changes in cystic fibrosis lung disease following two different types of physiotherapy: flutter vs autogenic drainage. Chest 1998;114(1):171–177.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science