Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Article CommentaryEditor's Commentary

Editor's Commentary

Respiratory Care September 2017, 62 (9) i;
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In our Editor's Choice paper, Berlinski and Pennington evaluate the effect of the interval between actuation of an albuterol hydrofluoralkane pressurized metered dose inhaler(pMDI) on aerosol delivery characteristics. Decreasing theinterval between actuations from 60 s to 30 s to 15 s did not affect the aerosol characteristics of Proair and Ventolin. The use of a valved holding chamber increased fine particle mass,but introducing a 10-s delay between actuation and inhalation significantly reduced fine particle mass. As pointed out by Newhouse and Amirav, implementation of these findingscould result in improved efficiency for healthcare providersin the hospital, a shorter time required for patient benefit, and time savings for the patient and caregiver at home.

In low resource settings, advanced respiratory support forneonates is limited by cost, technical expertise, and sporadicelectricity. John et al developed a simple solution to provide respiratory support for these infants. In a neonatal manikin,a modified bubble CPAP system reliably provided alternating pressures consistent with bilevel positive airway pressuremodes of respiratory support. The dual pressure technology is a simple, single connection add-on, which can readily beapplied to existing bubble CPAP systems. Shepherd and Logan propose that, if perfected and confirmed in real-world situations, this device has the potential to save lives in resource-limited settings.

Spirometric Z-scores from the Global Lung Initiative(GLI) rigorously account for age-related changes in lungfunction and are thus age-appropriate when establishing spirometric impairments. However, GLI-defined spirometric impairments have not yet been evaluated regarding associations with static lung volumes and diffusing capacity. Vaz Fragoso and colleagues found that GLI-defined spirometric restrictive pattern was strongly associated with a restrictiveventilatory defect, while GLI-defined spirometric airflow obstruction was strongly associated with hyperinflation and air trapping. Both spirometric impairments were strongly associated with decreased diffusing capacity. George and Skabelund suggest that, while the authors propose that the need forlung volumes is no longer necessary, without better and more concrete evidence, the use of spirometry to diagnose restrictive disease is not yet ready for clinical practice.

Significant concern exists regarding the respiratory healthof military personnel deployed to Southwest Asia, given theirexposures to numerous environmental hazards. Skabelund et al evaluated the pulmonary function and respiratory healthof military personnel prior to Southwest Asia deployment. Pre-deployment evaluation of military personnel identified numerous soldiers with active pulmonary symptoms and abnormal spirometry. Spirometry, combined with questions regarding asthma history, wheezing and exercise intolerance, mayidentify individuals at risk for deployment related respiratorycomplaints.

The objectives of the study by Gochicoa-Rangel were tovalidate the reference equations for impulse oscillometrypreviously published, and to compare the adjustment of newavailable reference equations for impulse oscillometry from different countries in a sample of healthy children. Because of the robust adjustment of the reference equations for impulse oscillometry, they can be recommended for both clinical and research purposes in this population. The differential adjustment of other equations underscores the need to obtainlocal reference values.

Allen et al hypothesized that a small, turbine-driven ventilator would allow rescuers to adhere more closely to American Heart Association advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines. When compared to a ventilator, volunteers ventilated with a self-inflating bag within ACLS guidelines. However, volunteers ventilated with increased variation, at higher tidal volumes and higher peak pressures with the self-inflating bag. Hands-off time was also significantly lower with theventilator.

Wenzel et al evaluated the resistance of coaxial tubing systems compared to a conventional circuit. The pressure gradient across the coaxial tubing system was up to 6 timeshigher compared to conventional circuits, and was higherduring expiration compared to inspiration. The perceived breathing resistance was also higher in coaxial tubing systems. These findings suggest that the use of coaxial tubingsystems should be carefully considered with respect to theirincreased resistance.

El-Haddad and colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study of the ARDS Network randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of severity and etiology of ARDSon short-term patient outcomes. Severity of ARDS based on PaO2/FIO2 did not impact 28-d mortality, ventilator-freedays, or ICU-free days. Among the etiologies of ARDS,trauma had the lowest 28-d and 60-d mortality, while subjects with aspiration had more ICU-free days and ventilator-free days.

Dailey and colleagues conducted an in vitro study comparing aerosol delivery through adult high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with heliox and oxygen. With a distressed breathing pattern, aerosol delivery was greater at 30 and 50L/min than with a quiet breathing pattern. There was a trend towards higher inhaled dose with heliox during HFNC thatdid not reach statistical significance.

Stéphan et al hypothesized that noninvasive ventilation(NIV) was superior to HFNC for preventing or resolving acute respiratory failure in obese subjects following cardiothoracic surgery. The use of continuous HFNC compared to intermittent NIV did not result in a worse rate of treatment failure. Because HFNC presents some advantages, the authors suggest that it might be used instead of NIV in obese patients after cardiothoracic surgery.

The study by Lim et al was performed to identify symptom clusters and the effects on quality of life in subjects with COPD. Their findings suggest that patients with COPD mayhave specific patterns of symptom clusters. The symptom clusters were related to clinical characteristics and had a negative impact on quality of life. To enhance symptom management and quality of life, approaches and interventions basedon symptom clusters may be more effective than independent intervention for each symptom.

Soffler and colleagues review the physiology of respiratory sensations in dynamic hyperinflation. A thorough understanding of the physiology of dyspnea and pathophysiologyof dynamic hyperinflation informs the interventions used to mitigate sensations of dyspnea and the physiologic effects of dynamic hyperinflation, respectively.

  • Copyright © 2017 by Daedalus Enterprises
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 62 (9)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 62, Issue 9
1 Sep 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor's Commentary
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor's Commentary
Respiratory Care Sep 2017, 62 (9) i;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Editor's Commentary
Respiratory Care Sep 2017, 62 (9) i;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire