Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
EditorialEditorials

Optoacoustic Evaluation of Endotracheal Tube Depth in Pediatrics

Andrew G Miller, Kyle J Rehder, Ira M Cheifetz and Neil R MacIntyre
Respiratory Care December 2018, 63 (12) 1575-1576; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06687
Andrew G Miller
Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
RRT RRT-ACCS RRT-NPS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Kyle J Rehder
Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ira M Cheifetz
Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
MD FAARC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil R MacIntyre
Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina
MD FAARC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Technological advancement is a cornerstone in the practice of respiratory care. Applying new technology to solve clinical problems requires careful investigation to ensure the safety and efficacy of new devices, protocols, and treatment modalities. New technologies are often rapidly incorporated into daily clinical practice before high-quality data are available to guide clinical practice. Thus, new devices used in respiratory care need to be evaluated quickly after being introduced into the marketplace to validate their efficacy and safety before they are used extensively in patients.

Despite various proposed methods and technologies to guide endotracheal tube (ETT) depth in infants and children,1–5 ETTs are frequently incorrectly positioned in this patient population, although there is a large variance in the proportion reported in the literature.4,6 Chest radiography remains the standard of care for confirming appropriate ETT position within the trachea, which requires equipment and personnel to be brought to the bedside. Despite digital machines being widely available, there still may be a significant delay between ETT placement and chest imaging. For patients intubated outside the hospital, chest radiography cannot be performed until the patient arrives in a setting where this technology is available. Thus, there is great potential value in a device that can rapidly evaluate ETT position in real-time at the bedside.

In this issue of Respiratory Care, Volsko and colleagues investigated the use of a new optoacoustic device to evaluate ETT depth in pediatric subjects.7 In this pilot study, they demonstrated the utility of this new technology to rapidly (ie, within 45 s) evaluate ETT depth in a cohort of 26 children. The procedure was relatively straightforward, with the acoustic detector placed at the sternal notch and a 1.0-mm optical fiber inserted through the ETT. Optical fibers were of a custom length for each ETT size. No adverse clinical events were noted. ETT position was detected accurately in 23 of the 26 subjects. Statistical analysis revealed a high level of agreement between the new device and chest radiography, as indicated by a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.91 and excellent agreement on the Bland-Altman analysis of bias and precision.

This is an excellent example of a pilot study of new technology. However, the results need to be interpreted with caution. First, a convenience sample of 26 subjects from a single center is insufficient to adequately evaluate this technology. A larger, multi-center study is required to better account for heterogeneity in patient populations, provider capability, equipment and techniques, and other support systems. Second, despite generally accurate assessments, the difference between radiography and the optoacoustic device for 2 ETTs were 1 cm and 0.7 cm, and a signal was undetected in a third subject. This means that the optoacoustic device provided a high level of accuracy for 88% of ETTs, which is similar to a simple approach evaluated by Phipps et al4 in which they found that 75% of ETTs were properly positioned on initial chest radiography using the internal diameter of the ETT × 3 as the initial depth. Phipps et al4 also found that, when using the ETT size predicted by the PALS algorithm or Broselow chart (estimated weight based on patient length), the accuracy increased to 81% and 85%, respectively. Third, no ETTs were at the carina or in a major bronchus, and thus the ability of the new device to detect this serious problem is not known. Finally, because none of the ETTs were evaluated in emergency or emergent situations, this device will require further investigation to evaluate its ability to detect incorrectly positioned ETTs in patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation, as well as those outside the hospital setting.

Despite the limitations of the current study, this technology has real potential to improve airway management in pediatric patients. In particular, its utility in premature infants is of great interest because there are no currently available rules to accurately predict ETT depth in infants weighing < 1 kg.8–10 Premature lungs are at particular risk of adverse events from incorrectly positioned ETTs, including pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial emphysema, and endobronchial surfactant delivery. Evaluation of this device in premature and term neonates is well warranted, as is a multi-center trial in pediatric subjects enrolling a larger sample size. In addition, the utility in out-of-hospital airway management may also be of interest, given that up to 79% of pediatric patients intubated in the field arrive with the ETT placed too deep.11 Use of the device by transport teams and emergency medical services as well as during intrahospital transport may help reduce adverse events related to ETT migration.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Andrew G Miller RRT RRT-ACCS RRT-NPS, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, P.O. Box 3911, Durham, North Carolina. E-mail: andrew.g.miller{at}duke.edu.
  • Dr Cheifetz discloses relationships with Philips, Up-to-Date, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr MacIntyre discloses relationships with Breathe Technology, InspiRx Pharma, and Ventec. The other authors have no conflicts to disclose.

  • See the Original Study on Page 1463

  • Copyright © 2018 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Chou EH,
    2. Dickman E,
    3. Tsou PY,
    4. et al
    . Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2015;90:97–103.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.
    1. Galicinao J,
    2. Bush AJ,
    3. Godambe SA
    . Use of bedside ultrasonography for endotracheal tube placement in pediatric patients: a feasibility study. Pediatrics 2007;120(6):1297–303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.
    1. Kattwinkel J,
    2. Perlman JM,
    3. Aziz K,
    4. et al
    . Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Pediatrics 2010;126(5):e1400–e1413.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Phipps LM,
    2. Thomas NJ,
    3. Gilmore RK,
    4. et al
    . Prospective assessment of guidelines for determining appropriate depth of endotracheal tube placement in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005;6(5):519–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sheth M,
    2. Jaeel P,
    3. Nguyen J
    . Ultrasonography for verification of endotracheal tube position in neonates and infants. Am J Perinatol 2017;34(7):627–32.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Volsko TA,
    2. McNinch NL,
    3. Prough DS,
    4. Bigham MT
    . Adherence to endotracheal tube depth guidelines and incidence of malposition in infants and children. Respir Care 2018;63(9):1111–17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Volsko TA,
    2. Petrov Y,
    3. McNinch NL,
    4. Prough DS,
    5. Anderson CR,
    6. Bigham MT
    . Accuracy and precision of an optoacoustic prototype in determining endotracheal tube position in children. Respir Care 2018;63(12):1463–1470.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Flinn AM,
    2. Travers CP,
    3. Laffan EE,
    4. O'Donnell CP
    . Estimating the endotracheal tube insertion depth in newborns using weight or gestation: a randomised trial. Neonatology 2015;107(3):167–72.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.
    1. Leung C
    . Optimal insertion depth for endotracheal tubes in extremely low-birth-weight infants. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2018;19(4):328–31.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Peterson J,
    2. Johnson N,
    3. Deakins K,
    4. Wilson-Costello D,
    5. Jelovsek JE,
    6. Chatburn R
    . Accuracy of the 7-8-9 rule for endotracheal tube placement in the neonate. J Perinatol 2006;26(6):333–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Orf J,
    2. Thomas SH,
    3. Ahmed W,
    4. et al
    . Appropriateness of endotracheal tube size and insertion depth in children undergoing air medical transport. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000;16(5):321–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 63 (12)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 63, Issue 12
1 Dec 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optoacoustic Evaluation of Endotracheal Tube Depth in Pediatrics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Optoacoustic Evaluation of Endotracheal Tube Depth in Pediatrics
Andrew G Miller, Kyle J Rehder, Ira M Cheifetz, Neil R MacIntyre
Respiratory Care Dec 2018, 63 (12) 1575-1576; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06687

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Optoacoustic Evaluation of Endotracheal Tube Depth in Pediatrics
Andrew G Miller, Kyle J Rehder, Ira M Cheifetz, Neil R MacIntyre
Respiratory Care Dec 2018, 63 (12) 1575-1576; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06687
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire