Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Effect of Different Closed Suction Catheter Designs and pMDI Adapters on Aerosol Delivery in Simulated Adult Mechanical Ventilation With and Without Exhaled Humidity

Jacqueline P Williams, Arzu Ari, Ramalingam Shanmugam and James B Fink
Respiratory Care September 2018, 63 (9) 1154-1161; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06085
Jacqueline P Williams
Respiratory Therapy Department, Emory University Midtown Hospital, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arzu Ari
Department of Respiratory Care, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Ramalingam Shanmugam
School of Health Administration, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James B Fink
Aerogen Pharma, San Mateo, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    American Association for Respiratory Care. AARC clinical practice guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways 2010. Respir Care 2010;55(6):758–764.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Paul-Allen J,
    2. Ostrow CL
    . Survey of nursing practices with closed-system suctioning. Am J Crit Care 2000;9(1):9–17.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  3. 3.
    1. Ozden D,
    2. Gorgulu RS
    . Development of standard practice guidelines for open and closed system suctioning. J Clin Nurs 2012;21(9-10):1327–1338.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Seckel MA
    . Ask the experts. Does the use of a closed suction system help to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia? Crit Care Nurse 2008;28(1):65–66.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bishop MJ,
    2. Larson RP,
    3. Buschman DL
    . Metered dose inhaler aerosol characteristics are affected by the endotracheal tube actuator/adapter used. Anesthesiology 1990;73(6):1263–1265.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fuller H,
    2. Dolovich M,
    3. Chambers C,
    4. Newhouse M
    . Aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation: a predictive in-vitro lung model. J Aerosol Med 1992;5(4):251–259.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rau J,
    2. Dunlevy C,
    3. Hill R
    . A comparison of inline MDI actuators for delivery of a beta agonist and a corticosteroid with a mechanically-ventilated lung model. Respir Care 1998;43:705–712.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.
    1. Ari A,
    2. Fink JB
    . Aerosol delivery devices for the treatment of adult patients in acute and critical care. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2016;17(14):1268–1277.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ari A
    . Aerosol drug delivery in critical pulmonary care. Respir Care 2015;60(6):858–879.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Diot P,
    2. Morra L,
    3. Smaldone GC
    . Albuterol delivery in a model of mechanical ventilation. Comparison of metered-dose inhaler and nebulizer efficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152(4 Pt 1):1391–1394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.
    1. Fink JB,
    2. Dhand R,
    3. Grychowski J,
    4. Fahey PJ,
    5. Tobin MJ
    . Reconciling in vitro and in vivo measurements of aerosol delivery from a metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation and defining efficiency-enhancing factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159(1):63–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Lange C,
    2. Finlay W
    . Overcoming the adverse effect of humidity in aerosol delivery via pressurized metered-dose inhalers during mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161(5):1614–1618.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hiller C,
    2. Mazumder M,
    3. Wilson D,
    4. Bone R
    . Aerodynamic size distribution of metered-dose bronchodilator aerosols. Am Rev Respir Dis 1978;118:311.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.
    1. Newman S
    . Aerosol deposition considerations in inhalation therapy. Chest 1985;88(Suppl 2):152S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.
    1. Sackner MA,
    2. Kim CS
    . Recent advances in the management of obstructive airways disease. Auxiliary MDI aerosol delivery systems. Chest 1985;88(2 Suppl):161S–170S.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.
    1. Ogrodnik N,
    2. Azzi V,
    3. Sprigge E,
    4. Fiset S,
    5. Matida E
    . Nonuniform deposition of pressurized metered-dose aerosol in spacer devices. J Aerosol Med Pulmon Drug Deliv 2016;29(6):490–500.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.
    1. Sanders M,
    2. Bruin R
    . A rationale for going back to the future: use of disposable spacers for pressurised metered dose inhalers. Pulmon Med 2015;176194.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Fuller HD,
    2. Dolovich MB,
    3. Turpie FH,
    4. Newhouse MT
    . Efficiency of bronchodilator aerosol delivery to the lungs from the metered dose inhaler in mechanically ventilated patients. A study comparing four different actuator devices. Chest 1994;105(1):214–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Rau J,
    2. Harwood R,
    3. Groff J
    . Evaluation of a reservoir device for metered-dose bronchodilator delivery to intubated adults: an in-vitro study. Chest 1992;102(3):924–930.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Dhand R,
    2. Tobin MJ
    . Bronchodilator delivery with metered-dose inhalers in mechanically-ventilated patients. Eur Respir J 1996;9(3):585–595.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Robertson S,
    2. Canary CW,
    3. Orr M,
    4. Herberg P,
    5. Rutledge DN
    . Factors related to progression and graduation rates for RN-to-bachelor of science in nursing programs: searching for realistic benchmarks. J Prof Nurs 2010;26(2):99–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Crogan SJ,
    2. Bishop MJ
    . Delivery efficiency of metered dose aerosols given via endotracheal tubes. Anesthesiology 1989;70(6):1008–1010.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Takaya T,
    2. Takeyama K,
    3. Takiguchi M
    . The efficiency of beta 2-agonist delivery through tracheal tubes with the metered-dose inhaler: an in vitro study. J Anesth 2002;16(4):284–288.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Marik P,
    2. Hogan J,
    3. Krikorian J
    . A comparison of bronchodilator therapy delivered by nebulization and metered-dose inhaler in mechanically ventilated patients. Chest 1999;115:1653–1657.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ari A,
    2. Areabi H,
    3. Fink JB
    . Evaluation of position of aerosol device in two different ventilator circuits during mechanical ventilation. Respir Care 2010;55(7):837–844.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ricard JD,
    2. Markowicz P,
    3. Djedaini K,
    4. Mier L,
    5. Coste F,
    6. Dreyfuss D
    . Bedside evaluation of efficient airway humidification during mechanical ventilation of the critically ill. Chest 1999;115(6):1646–1652.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.
    1. Restrepo RD,
    2. Walsh BK
    . Humidification during invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation: 2012. Respir Care 2012;57(5):782–788.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.
    1. Ari A,
    2. Alwadeai KS,
    3. Fink JB
    . Effects of heat and moisture exchangers and exhaled humidity on aerosol deposition in a simulated ventilator-dependent adult lung model. Respir Care 2017;62(5):538–543.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ari A,
    2. Harwood R,
    3. Sheard M,
    4. Alquaimi MM,
    5. Alhamad B,
    6. Fink JB
    . Quantifying aerosol delivery in simulated spontaneously breathing patients with tracheostomy using different humidification systems with or without exhaled humidity. Respir Care 2016;61(5):600–606.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 63 (9)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 63, Issue 9
1 Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effect of Different Closed Suction Catheter Designs and pMDI Adapters on Aerosol Delivery in Simulated Adult Mechanical Ventilation With and Without Exhaled Humidity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Effect of Different Closed Suction Catheter Designs and pMDI Adapters on Aerosol Delivery in Simulated Adult Mechanical Ventilation With and Without Exhaled Humidity
Jacqueline P Williams, Arzu Ari, Ramalingam Shanmugam, James B Fink
Respiratory Care Sep 2018, 63 (9) 1154-1161; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06085

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Effect of Different Closed Suction Catheter Designs and pMDI Adapters on Aerosol Delivery in Simulated Adult Mechanical Ventilation With and Without Exhaled Humidity
Jacqueline P Williams, Arzu Ari, Ramalingam Shanmugam, James B Fink
Respiratory Care Sep 2018, 63 (9) 1154-1161; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06085
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • aerosol
  • airway clearance
  • mechanical ventilation
  • closed suction catheters
  • metered dose inhalers
  • pMDI adapters
  • drug delivery

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire