Technical Advances in the Field of ECMO

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Thiagarajan RR,
   2. Barbaro RP,
   3. Rycus PT,
   4. McMullan M,
   5. Conrad SA,
   6. Fortenberry JD,
   7. Paden ML

   . Extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016. ASAIO J 2017;63(1):60–67.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Abrams D,
   2. Brodie D

   . Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult respiratory failure: 2017 update. Chest 2017;152(3):639–649.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Müller T,
   2. Bein T,
   3. Phillip A,
   4. Graf B,
   5. Schmid C,
   6. Riegger G

   . Extracorporeal pulmonary support in severe pulmonary failure in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013;110(10):159–166.

   OpenUrlPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Toomasian JM,
   2. Schreiner RJ,
   3. Meyer DE,
   4. Schmidt ME,
   5. Hagan SE,
   6. Griffith GW,
   7. et al

   . A polymethylpentene fiber gas exchanger for long-term extracorporeal life support. ASAIO J 2005;51(4):390–397.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Weems MF,
   2. Friedlich PS,
   3. Nelson LP,
   4. Rake AJ,
   5. Klee L,
   6. Stein JE,
   7. Stavroudis TA

   . The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation simulation training at extracorporeal life support organization centers in the United States. Sim Healthcare 2017;12(3):233–239.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   1. Yeager T,
   2. Shuvo R

   . Evolution of gas permeable membranes for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artificial Organs 2017;41(8):700–709.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Strueber M

   . Artificial lungs: are we there yet? Thorac Surg Clin 2015;25(1):107–113.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 8.↵
   1. Eash HJ,
   2. Jones HM,
   3. Hattler BG,
   4. Federspiel WJ

   . Evaluation of plasma resistant hollow fiber membranes for artificial lungs. ASAIO J 2004;50(5):491–497.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Rambaud J,
   2. Guilbert J,
   3. Guellec I,
   4. Renolleau S

   . A pilot study comparing two polymethylpentene extracorporeal membrane oxygenators. Perfusion 2012;218(1):14–20.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Gill MC,
    2. O'Shaughnessy K,
    3. Dittmer J

    . A paedatric ECMO case of plasma leakage through a polymethylpentene oxygenator. Perfusion 2015;30(7):600–603.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. O'Brien C,
    2. Monteagudo J,
    3. Schad C,
    4. Cheung E,
    5. Middlesworth W

    . Centrifugal pumps and hemolysis in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients: an analysis of Extracorporeal Life Support (ELSO) registry data. J Pediatr Surg 2017;52(6):975–978.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Lawson DS,
    2. Lawson AF,
    3. Walczak R,
    4. McRobb C,
    5. McDermott P,
    6. Shearer IR,
    7. et al

    . North American neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) devices and team roles: 2008 survey results of Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) centers. Extra Corpor Technol 2008;40(3):166–174.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Alwardt CM,
    2. Wilson DS,
    3. Alore ML,
    4. Lanza LA,
    5. Devaleria PA,
    6. Pajaro OE

    . Performance and safety of an integrated portable extracorporeal life support system for adults. J Extra Corpor Technol 2015;47(1):38–43.

    OpenUrl
14. 14.↵
    1. Haneya A,
    2. Philipp A,
    3. Foltan M,
    4. Camboni D,
    5. Müeller T,
    6. Bein T,
    7. et al

    . First experience with the new portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system Cardiohelp for severe respiratory failure in adults. Perfusion 2012;27(2):150–155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Philipp A,
    2. Arlt M,
    3. Amann M,
    4. Lunz D,
    5. Müller T,
    6. Hilker M,
    7. et al

    . First experience with the ultra-compact mobile extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system Cardiohelp in interhospital transport. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011;12(6):978–981.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Fleck T,
    2. Benk C,
    3. Klemm R,
    4. Kroll J,
    5. Siepe M,
    6. Grohmann J,
    7. et al

    . First serial in vivo results of mechanical circulatory support in children with a new diagonal pump. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44(5):828–835.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Lunz D,
    2. Phillip A,
    3. Judeman K,
    4. Amann M,
    5. Foltan M,
    6. Schmid C,
    7. et al

    . First experience with the Deltastream DP3 in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and air-supported inter-hospital transport. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2013;17(5):773–777.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Stiller B,
    2. Houmes RJ,
    3. Rüffer A,
    4. Kumpf M,
    5. Müller A,
    6. Kipfmüller F,
    7. et al

    . Multicenter experience with mechanical circulatory support using a new diagonal pump in 233 children. Artif Organs 2018;42(4):377–385.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Speth M,
    2. Münch F,
    3. Purbojo A,
    4. Glöckler M,
    5. Toka O,
    6. Cesnjevar RA,
    7. Rüffer A

    . Pediatric extracorporeal life support using a third generation diagonal pump. ASAIO J 2016;62(4):482–490.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.↵
    1. Evenson A,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Kunselman AR,
    4. Ündar A

    . Use of a novel diagonal pump in an in vitro neonatal pulsatile extracorporeal life support circuit. Artificial Organs 2014;38(1):E1–E9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Wang S,
    2. Kunselman AR,
    3. Clark JB,
    4. Ündar A

    . In vitro hemodynamic evaluation of a novel pulsatile extracorporeal life support system: impact of perfusion modes and circuit components on energy loss. Artif Organs 2015;39(1):59–66.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.↵
    1. Wang S,
    2. Kunselman AR,
    3. Ündar A

    . Novel diagonal pump for pediatric extracorporeal life support system. Artificial Organs 2013;37(1):37–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Patel S,
    2. Wang S,
    3. Pauliks L,
    4. Chang D,
    5. Clark JB,
    6. Kunselman AR,
    7. Ündar A

    . Evaluation of a novel pulsatile extracorporeal life support system synchronized to the cardiac cycle: effect of rhythm changes on hemodynamic performance. Artif Organs 2015;39(1):67–76.

    OpenUrl
24. 24.↵
    1. Cove ME,
    2. MacLaren G,
    3. Federspiel WJ,
    4. Kellum JA

    . Bench to bedside review: extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, past, present and future. Critical Care 2012;16(5):232–241.

    OpenUrlPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Hermann A,
    2. Staudinger T,
    3. Bojic A,
    4. Riss K,
    5. Wohlfarth P,
    6. Robak O,
    7. et al

    . First experience with a new miniaturized pump-driven venovenous extracorporeal CO₂ removal system (iLA Activve): a retrospective data analysis. ASAIO J. 2014;60(3):342–347.

    OpenUrl
26. 26.↵
    1. Hermann A,
    2. Riss K,
    3. Schellongowski P,
    4. Bojic A,
    5. Wohlfarth P,
    6. Robak O,
    7. et al

    . A novel pump-driven veno-venous gas exchange system during extracorporeal CO2-removal. Intensive Care Med 2015;41(10):1773–1780.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Braune S,
    2. Sieweke A,
    3. Brettner F,
    4. Staudinger T,
    5. Joannidis M,
    6. Verbrugge S,
    7. et al

    . The feasibility and safety of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to avoid intubation in patients with COPD unresponsive to noninvasive ventilation for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (ECLAIR study): multicentre case-control study. Intensive Care Med 2016;42(9):1437–1444.

    OpenUrl
28. 28.↵
    1. Jeffries RG,
    2. Mussin Y,
    3. Bulanin DS,
    4. Lund LW,
    5. Kocyildirim E,
    6. Zhumadilov ZZ,
    7. et al

    . Pre-clinical evaluation of an adult extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal system with active mixing for pediatric respiratory support. Int J Artif Organs 2014;37(12):888–899.

    OpenUrl
29. 29.↵
    1. Bermudez CA,
    2. Zaldonis D,
    3. Fan MH,
    4. Pilewski JM,
    5. Crespo MM

    . Prolonged use of the hemolung respiratory assist system as a bridge to redo lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100(6):2330–2333.

    OpenUrl
30. 30.↵
    1. Burki NK,
    2. Mani RK,
    3. Herth FJF,
    4. Schmidt W,
    5. Teschler H,
    6. Bonin F,
    7. et al

    . A novel extracorporeal CO₂ removal system: results of a pilot study of hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with COPD. Chest 2013;143(3):678–686.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Tiruvoipati R,
    2. Buscher H,
    3. Winearls J,
    4. Breeding J,
    5. Ghosh D,
    6. Chaterjee S,
    7. et al

    . Early experience of a new extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal device for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Crit Care Resusc 2016;18(4):261–269.

    OpenUrl
32. 32.↵
    1. Fanelli V,
    2. Ranieri MV,
    3. Mancebo J,
    4. Moerer O,
    5. Quintel M,
    6. Morley S,
    7. et al

    . Feasibility and safety of low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to facilitate ultra-protective ventilation in patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2016;20:36–43.

    OpenUrl
33. 33.↵
    1. Romagnoli S,
    2. Ricci Z,
    3. Ronco C

    . Novel extracorporeal therapies for combined renal-pulmonary dysfunction. Semin Nephrol 2016;36(1):71–77.

    OpenUrl
34. 34.↵
    1. Godet T,
    2. Combes A,
    3. Zogheib E,
    4. Jabaudon M,
    5. Futier E,
    6. Slutsky AS,
    7. Constantin JM

    . Novel CO₂ removal device driven by a renal-replacement system without hemofilter: a first step experimental validation. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2015;34(3):135–140.

    OpenUrl
35. 35.↵
    1. Eloot S,
    2. Peperstraete H,
    3. DeSomer F,
    4. Hoste E

    . Assessment of the optimal operating parameters during extracorporeal CO₂ removal with the Abylcap® system. Int J Artif Organs 2016;39(11):580–585.

    OpenUrl
36. 36.↵
    1. Peperstraete H,
    2. Eloot S,
    3. Depuydt P,
    4. DeSomer F,
    5. Hoste E,
    6. Roosen C,
    7. Hoste E

    . Low flow extracorporeal CO₂ removal in ARDS patients: a prospective short-term crossover pilot study. BMJ Anesthesiology 2017;17(1):155–164.

    OpenUrl
37. 37.↵
    1. Quintard JM,
    2. Barbot O,
    3. Thevenot F,
    4. de Matteis O,
    5. Benayoun L,
    6. Leibinger F

    . Partial extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal using a standard continuous renal replacement therapy device: a preliminary study. ASAIO J 2014;60(5):564–569.

    OpenUrl
38. 38.↵
    1. Forster C,
    2. Schriewer J,
    3. John S,
    4. Eckardt KU,
    5. Willam C

    . Low-flow CO₂ removal integrated into a renal-replacement circuit can reduce acidosis and decrease vasopressor requirements. Crit Care 2013;17(4):R154.

    OpenUrl
39. 39.↵
    1. Rehder KJ,
    2. Turner DA,
    3. Hartwig MG,
    4. Williford WL,
    5. Bonadonna D,
    6. Walczak RJ Jr..,
    7. et al

    . Active rehabilitation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation. Respir Care 2013;58(8):1291–1298.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Bain JC,
    2. Turner DA,
    3. Rehder KJ,
    4. Eisenstein EL,
    5. Davis RD,
    6. Cheifetz IM,
    7. Zaas DW

    . Economic outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with and without ambulation as a bridge to lung transplantation. Respir Care 2016;61(1):1–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    1. Spinelli E,
    2. Protti A

    . Get fit for lung transplant with ambulatory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation! Respir Care 2016;61(1):117–118.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Sanchez PG,
    3. Wei X,
    4. Watkins AC,
    5. Niu S,
    6. Wu ZJ,
    7. Griffith BP

    . Effects of cardiopulmonary support with a novel pediatric pump-lung in a 30-day ovine animal model. Artif Organs 2015;39(12):989–997.

    OpenUrl
43. 43.↵
    1. Wei X,
    2. Sanchez PG,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. Watkins AC,
    5. Li T,
    6. Griffith BP,
    7. Wu ZJ

    . Extracorporeal respiratory support with a miniature integrated pediatric pump-lung device in an acute ovine respiratory failure model. Artif Organs 2016;40(11):1046–1053.

    OpenUrl
44. 44.↵
    1. Madhani SP,
    2. Frankowski BJ,
    3. Burgreen GW,
    4. Antaki JF,
    5. Kormos R,
    6. D'Cunha J,
    7. Federspiel WJ

    . In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel integrated wearable artificial lung. J Heart Lung Transplant 2017;36(7):806–811.

    OpenUrl
45. 45.↵
    1. Skoog DJ,
    2. Pohlmann JR,
    3. Demos DS,
    4. Scipione CN,
    5. Iyengar A,
    6. Schewe RE,
    7. et al

    . Fourteen day in vivo testing of a compliant thoracic artificial lung. ASAIO J 2017;63(5):644–649.

    OpenUrl
46. 46.↵
    1. Fernando UP,
    2. Thompson AJ,
    3. Potkay J,
    4. Cheriyan H,
    5. Toomasian J,
    6. Kaesler A,
    7. et al

    . A membrane lung design based on circular blood flow paths. ASAIO J 2017;63(5):637–643.

    OpenUrl
47. 47.↵
    1. Schewe RE,
    2. Khanafer KM,
    3. Arab A,
    4. Mitchell JA,
    5. Skoog DJ,
    6. Cook KE

    . Design and in vitro assessment of an improved, low-resistance, compliant thoracic artificial lung. ASAIO J 2012 58(6):583–589.

    OpenUrlPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Beal MD,
    2. Kinnear J,
    3. Anderson CR,
    4. Martin TD,
    5. Wamboldt R,
    6. Hooper L

    . The effectiveness of medical simulation in teaching medical students critical care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simul Healthcare 2017;12(2):104–116.

    OpenUrl
49. 49.
    1. Allan CK,
    2. Thiagarajan RR,
    3. Beke D,
    4. Imprescia A,
    5. Kappus LJ,
    6. Garden A,
    7. et al

    . Simulation-based training delivered directly to the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit engenders preparedness, comfort, and decreased anxiety among multidisciplinary resuscitation teams. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;14D(3)140:645–652.

    OpenUrl
50. 50.↵
    1. Smelt JLC,
    2. Phillips S,
    3. Hamilton C,
    4. Fricker P,
    5. Spray D,
    6. Nowell JL,
    7. Jahangiri M

    . Simulator teaching of cardiopulmonary bypass complications: a prospective, randomized study. J Surg Ed 2016;73(6):1026–1031.

    OpenUrl
51. 51.↵
    1. Fehr JJ,
    2. Shepard M,
    3. McBride ME,
    4. Mehegan M,
    5. Reddy K,
    6. Murray DJ,
    7. Boulet JR

    . Simulation-based assessment of ECMO clinical specialists. Sim Healthcare 2016;11(3):194–199.

    OpenUrl
52. 52.
    1. Sanchez-Glanville C,
    2. Brindle ME,
    3. Spence T,
    4. Blackwood J,
    5. Drews T,
    6. Menzies S,
    7. Lopushinsky SR

    . Evaluating the introduction of extracorporeal life support technology to a tertiary-care pediatric institution: smoothing the learning curve through interprofessional simulation training. J Pediatr Surg 2015;50(5):798–804.

    OpenUrl
53. 53.↵
    1. Zakhary BM,
    2. Kam LM,
    3. Kaufman BS,
    4. Felner KJ

    . The utility of high-fidelity simulation for training critical care fellows in the management of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation emergencies: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2017;45(8):1367–1373.

    OpenUrl
54. 54.↵
    1. Thompson JL,
    2. Grisham LM,
    3. Scott J,
    4. Mogan C,
    5. Prescher H,
    6. Biffar D,
    7. et al

    . Construction of a reusable, high-fidelity model to enhance extracorporeal membrane oxygenation training through simulation. Adv Neonatal Care 2014;14(2):103–109.

    OpenUrl
55. 55.↵
    1. Allan CK,
    2. Pigula F,
    3. Bacha EA,
    4. Emani S,
    5. Fynn-Thompson F,
    6. Thiagarajan RR,
    7. et al

    . An extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation curriculum featuring a novel integrated skills trainer leads to improved performance among pediatric cardiac surgery trainees. Sim Healthcare 2013;8(4):221–228.

    OpenUrl
56. 56.↵
    1. Atamanyuka I,
    2. Gheza O,
    3. Saeeda I,
    4. Laneb M,
    5. Hall J,
    6. Jackson T,
    7. et al

    . Impact of an open-chest extracorporeal membrane oxygenation model for in situ simulated team training: a pilot study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014;18(1):17–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Ribeiro IB,
    2. Ngu JMC,
    3. Gurinder G,
    4. Rubens FD

    . Development of a high fidelity beating heart simulator for cardiac surgery training. Perfusion 2017;32(7):568–573.

    OpenUrl