Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
EditorialEditor's Choice

In Vitro–In Silico Comparison of Pulsed Oxygen Delivery From Portable Oxygen Concentrators Versus Continuous Flow Oxygen Delivery

John Z Chen, Ira M Katz, Marine Pichelin, Kaixian Zhu, Georges Caillibotte, Warren H Finlay and Andrew R Martin
Respiratory Care February 2019, 64 (2) 117-129; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06359
John Z Chen
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Ira M Katz
Medical R&D, Air Liquide Santé International, Centre de Recherche Paris-Saclay, Les Loges-en-Josas, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marine Pichelin
Medical R&D, Air Liquide Santé International, Centre de Recherche Paris-Saclay, Les Loges-en-Josas, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaixian Zhu
Centre Explor!, Air Liquide Healthcare, Gentilly, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georges Caillibotte
Medical R&D, Air Liquide Santé International, Centre de Recherche Paris-Saclay, Les Loges-en-Josas, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Warren H Finlay
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew R Martin
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Croxton TL,
    2. Bailey WC
    . Long-term oxygen treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: recommendations for future research: an NHLBI workshop report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174(4):373–378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lacasse Y,
    2. Bernard S,
    3. Maltais F
    . Eligibility for home oxygen programs and funding across Canada. Can Respir J 2015;22(6):324–330.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. McCoy R
    . Oxygen-conserving techniques and devices. Respir Care 2000;45(1):95–103; discussion 104.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Bliss PL,
    2. McCoy RW,
    3. Adams AB
    . Characteristics of demand oxygen delivery systems: maximum output and setting recommendations. Respir Care 2004;49(2):160–165.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Palwai A,
    2. Skowronski M,
    3. Coreno A,
    4. Drummond C,
    5. McFadden ER Jr.
    . Critical comparisons of the clinical performance of oxygen-conserving devices. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181(10):1061–1071.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tiep B
    . Portable oxygen therapy with oxygen conserving devices and methodologies. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1995;50(1):51–57.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Airsep Freestyle Patient Manual. MN123–1 rev E 11/12. Buffalo, NY: AirSep.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Yáñez AM,
    2. Prat JP,
    3. Álvarez-Sala JL,
    4. Calle M,
    5. Diaz Lobato S,
    6. Garcia Gonzalez JL,
    7. et al
    . Oxygenation with a single portable pulse-dose oxygen-conserving device and combined stationary and portable oxygen delivery devices in subjects with COPD. Respir Care 2015;60(3):382–387.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wijkstra PJ,
    2. Guyatt GH,
    3. Ambrosino N,
    4. Celli BR,
    5. Güell R,
    6. Muir JF,
    7. et al
    . International approaches to the prescription of long-term oxygen therapy. Eur Respir J 2001;18(6):909–913.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chen JZ,
    2. Katz IM,
    3. Pichelin M,
    4. Zhu K,
    5. Caillibotte G,
    6. Noga ML,
    7. et al
    . Comparison of pulsed versus continuous oxygen delivery using realistic adult nasal airway replicas. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017;12:2559–2571.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chatila W,
    2. Nugent T,
    3. Vance G,
    4. Gaughan J,
    5. Criner GJ
    . The effects of high-flow vs low-flow oxygen on exercise in advanced obstructive airways disease. Chest 2004;126(4):1108–1115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hudgel DW,
    2. Martin RJ,
    3. Capehart M,
    4. Johnson B,
    5. Hill P
    . Contribution of hypoventilation to sleep oxygen desaturation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1983;55(3):669–677.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Martin AR,
    2. Jackson C,
    3. Katz IM,
    4. Caillibotte G
    . Variability in uptake efficiency for pulsed versus constant concentration delivery of inhaled nitric oxide. Med Gas Res 2014;4(1):1.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Finlay WH,
    2. Lange CF,
    3. King M,
    4. Speert DP
    . Lung delivery of aerosolized dextran. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161(1):91–97.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Phillips CG,
    2. Kaye SR,
    3. Schroter RC
    . A diameter-based reconstruction of the branching pattern of the human bronchial tree. Part I. Description and application. Respir Physiol 1994;98(2):193–217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zhou S,
    2. Chatburn RL
    . Effect of the anatomic reservoir on low-flow oxygen delivery via nasal cannula: constant flow versus pulse flow with portable oxygen concentrator. Respir Care 2014;59(8):1199–1209.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Chatburn RL,
    2. Williams TJ
    . Performance comparison of 4 portable oxygen concentrators. Respir Care 2010;55(4):433–442.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Bliss PL,
    2. McCoy RW,
    3. Adams AB
    . A bench study comparison of demand oxygen delivery systems and continuous flow oxygen. Respir Care 1999;44(8):925–931.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Finlay WH
    . The mechanics of inhaled pharmaceutical aerosols: an introduction. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001:151–154.
  20. 20.
    1. Agustí AG,
    2. Barberá JA,
    3. Roca J,
    4. Wagner PD,
    5. Guitart R,
    6. Rodriguez-Roisin R
    . Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and gas exchange during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest 1990;97(2):268–275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.
    1. Katz IM,
    2. Martin AR,
    3. Caillibotte G,
    4. Arpentinier P
    . Property value estimation for inhaled therapeutic binary gas mixtures: He, Xe, N2O, and N2 with O2. Med Gas Res 2011;1:28.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 64 (2)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 64, Issue 2
1 Feb 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro–In Silico Comparison of Pulsed Oxygen Delivery From Portable Oxygen Concentrators Versus Continuous Flow Oxygen Delivery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In Vitro–In Silico Comparison of Pulsed Oxygen Delivery From Portable Oxygen Concentrators Versus Continuous Flow Oxygen Delivery
John Z Chen, Ira M Katz, Marine Pichelin, Kaixian Zhu, Georges Caillibotte, Warren H Finlay, Andrew R Martin
Respiratory Care Feb 2019, 64 (2) 117-129; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06359

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
In Vitro–In Silico Comparison of Pulsed Oxygen Delivery From Portable Oxygen Concentrators Versus Continuous Flow Oxygen Delivery
John Z Chen, Ira M Katz, Marine Pichelin, Kaixian Zhu, Georges Caillibotte, Warren H Finlay, Andrew R Martin
Respiratory Care Feb 2019, 64 (2) 117-129; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06359
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methodology
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT)
  • ambulatory oxygen
  • portable oxygen concentrator (POC)
  • lung simulator
  • nasal cannula
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • oxygen therapy
  • lung model
  • trumpet model
  • pulse

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire