Humidification Performance of Passive and Active Humidification Devices Within a Spontaneously Breathing Tracheostomized Cohort

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Cheung NH,
   2. Napolitano LM

   . Tracheostomy: epidemiology, indications, timing, technique, and outcomes. Respir Care 2014;59(6):895–915; discussion 916-919.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Williams R,
   2. Rankin N,
   3. Smith T,
   4. Galler D,
   5. Seakins P

   . Relationship between the humidity and temperature of inspired gas and the function of the airway mucosa. Crit Care Med 1996;24(11):1920–1929.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Restrepo RD,
   2. Walsh BK

   American Association for Respiratory Care, Restrepo RD, Walsh BK. Humidification during invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation: 2012. Respir Care 2012;57(5):782–788.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Chikata Y,
   2. Oto J,
   3. Onodera M,
   4. Nishimura M

   . Humidification performance of humidifying devices for tracheostomized patients with spontaneous breathing: a bench study. Respir Care 2013;58(9):1442–1448.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Tilling SE,
   2. Hancox AJ,
   3. Hayes B

   . An accurate method of measuring medical humidifier output. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1983;4(2):197–209.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.↵
   ISO. Respiratory tract humidifiers for medical use: particular requirements for respiratory humidification systems. 3rd ed. 2007;8185.
7. 7.↵
   1. Lellouche F,
   2. Taillé S,
   3. Lefrançois F,
   4. Deye N,
   5. Maggiore SM,
   6. Jouvet P,
   7. et al

   ; Groupe de travail sur les Respirateurs de l'AP-HP. Humidification performance of 48 passive airway humidifiers: comparison with manufacturer data. Chest 2009;135(2):276–286.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Cuquemelle E,
   2. Lellouche F

   . Assessment of humidification performance: still no easy method! Respir Care 2013;58(9):1559–1561.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Chikata Y,
   2. Imanaka H,
   3. Onishi Y,
   4. Ueta M,
   5. Nishimura M

   . Humidification during high-frequency oscillation ventilation is affected by ventilator circuit and ventilatory setting. Paediatr Anaesth 2009;19(8):779–783.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Chikata Y,
    2. Izawa M,
    3. Okuda N,
    4. Itagaki T,
    5. Nakataki E,
    6. Onodera M,
    7. et al

    . Humidification performance of two high-flow nasal cannula devices: a bench study. Respir Care 2014;59(8):1186–1190.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Branson RD,
    2. Davis K Jr.,
    3. Brown R,
    4. Rashkin M

    . Comparison of three humidification techniques during mechanical ventilation: patient selection, cost and infections considerations. Respir Care 1996;41(9):809–816.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Eaton Turner E,
    2. Jenks M

    . Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of high-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in intensive care units in NHS England. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2018;18(3)331–337.

    OpenUrl