Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Inspiratory Capacity and Vital Capacity of Healthy Subjects 9–81 Years of Age at Moderate-High Altitude

Silvia Cid-Juárez, Ireri Thirión-Romero, Luis Torre-Bouscoulet, Laura Gochicoa-Rangel, David Martínez-Briseño, Iván Y Hernández-Paniagua, Olivia Delgadillo-Ruiz, Selene Guerrero-Zúñiga, Rodrigo Del Río-Hidalgo, Daniel Cortés-Medina, Peter E Bapo-López, Pablo León-Gómez, Anaid Bautista-Bernal and Rogelio Pérez-Padilla
Respiratory Care February 2019, 64 (2) 153-160; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06284
Silvia Cid-Juárez
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ireri Thirión-Romero
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
Smoking Cessation and COPD Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luis Torre-Bouscoulet
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
Department of Clinical Investigation, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Gochicoa-Rangel
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Martínez-Briseño
Department of Epidemiological and Social Health Science, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iván Y Hernández-Paniagua
Consorcio Centromet, Conacyt, Querétaro, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivia Delgadillo-Ruiz
Consorcio Centromet, Conacyt, Querétaro, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Selene Guerrero-Zúñiga
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodrigo Del Río-Hidalgo
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Cortés-Medina
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter E Bapo-López
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pablo León-Gómez
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anaid Bautista-Bernal
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rogelio Pérez-Padilla
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
Smoking Cessation and COPD Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cosío Villegas,” Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurements of inspiratory capacity (IC) and vital capacity (VC) are used to recognize dynamic hyperinflation, but appropriate reference values are required to achieve accurate clinical interpretations. Altitude above sea level is a potential determining factor for lung volumes, including IC and VC.

OBJECTIVE: To describe IC and VC for healthy people who live in Mexico City at an altitude of 2,240 m above sea level.

METHODS: Healthy subjects ages 9–81 y completed slow spirometry by following 2005 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society standards. Once associations were explored, linear regression models were constructed and values were compared with those from previously published equations.

RESULTS: A total of 441 healthy subjects (55.1% women) participated. The mean age was 32 y (minimum age, 9 y; maximum age, 81 y). IC and VC measurements were associated with sex, age, height, and weight. An accelerated increase in IC and VC was evident from 9 to 20 y of age, followed by a gradual decrease in both sexes. In general, IC was higher in our population than predicted by previously published reference equations.

CONCLUSIONS: IC in healthy people at 2,240 m above sea level was higher than that of previous reports about European and Latin-American subjects of the same height, sex, and age who were at sea level. The present study provided robust reference values for persons who lived at a moderate altitude.

  • inspiratory capacity
  • reference values
  • altitude
  • pulmonary function tests
  • aging
  • lung volumes

Introduction

Inspiratory capacity (IC), which is the volume difference between total lung capacity and the functional residual capacity, has emerged as a physiologic parameter with relevant clinical implications.1,2 For instance, a low IC, usually due to air trapping, is predictive for dyspnea, poor quality of life,1–4 and low exercise capacity1,5 in patients with COPD. In addition, a low IC increases the risk of death in patients with COPD or pulmonary hypertension.6 According to the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society standards,1,5 the ratio of FEV1 to vital capacity (VC), by means of a slow maneuver,7 can be used to determine the presence of airway obstruction.8 During a slow VC maneuver, less thoracic gas compression occurs and greater air volume can be expired in patients with COPD as the airways collapse during a forced expiration, a mechanism that contributes importantly to exercise impairment.9

Although IC and VC are clinically relevant, proper reference values are required to achieve accurate interpretations, but few are available. Besides the typical predictors of lung function, such as height, age, sex, or ethnicity,10,11 altitude above sea level is a potential determining factor for lung volumes.12 Thus, existing IC and VC reference values may not be applicable to residents of Mexico City who live 2,240 m above sea level.13 Our group previously reported higher forced spirometry values for healthy Mexican people than that predicted by reference equations used internationally.13 That finding, although incompletely understood, may be due to a larger chest size at altitude.14

In this study, we decided to obtain IC and VC by using spirometry rather than plethysmography because both methods provide similar IC values.15 When using simple spirometry, the clinician can obtain an easy, fast, low-cost, and reliable IC in his or her office. Thus, the objective of our study was to describe IC and VC by using slow spirometry in a healthy population who live at a moderate altitude. The participants included children and adults under similar measurement conditions (It means that each subject measured height, weight and slow spirometry under similar conditions, in a standardized way) to obtain information on the growth and decline of lung function. We also compared our results with other studies, mostly conducted at sea level, by evaluating IC and VC either directly or indirectly.

QUICK LOOK

Current knowledge

Measurements of inspiratory capacity (IC) and vital capacity (VC) are used to recognize dynamic hyperinflation, but published reference values, required to achieve accurate clinical interpretations, are few and utilized either a plethysmographic technique or a slow VC maneuver. In addition, available equations cover a limited range of ages: children or adults. Altitude above sea level is a potential determining factor for lung volumes, including IC and VC.

What this paper contributes to our knowledge

Our cross-sectional study described the growth and decline of IC and slow VC with similar procedures and equipment by using a widely available spirometric technique. A significant decline with age was observed for IC and was more marked for VC. Healthy residents at moderate altitude (2,240 m above sea level) had higher values (adjusted by age, height, and sex) than those of previous reports for European and Latin-American subjects studied at sea level.

Methods

The study protocol was approved by The National Institute of Respiratory Disease's ethics committee (code C28–13), and the adults or parents of the children who participated in the study signed a letter of informed consent. Testing was conducted from May 2013 to August 2014 at the pulmonary function test laboratory of the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases in Mexico City, a reference center for respiratory diseases where primarily uninsured patients are seen. We included Mexican male and female individuals who resided in the metropolitan area of Mexico City (2,240 m above sea level), >9 y of age, never-smokers (<400 cigarettes smoked in their lifetime), non-obese (body mass index [BMI] <30 kg/m2 in individuals ages > 18 y and falling within the <95th percentile of U.S. Center for Disease Control values in younger individuals), without previous respiratory diseases diagnosed by a physician and lacking sustained respiratory symptoms (wheezing, dyspnea, cough, or phlegm). The participants were selected by invitation or through posters, mostly from among National Institute of Respiratory Diseases employees, their relatives, and students (medical, respiratory care, nursing) enrolled in courses at our institution. No participants were active in competitive sports. Ethnic origin is usually not included in surveys applied in Mexico City, and all the participants were considered to be Mexican mestizos.

Spirometry tests and slow VC were performed with pneumotachograph-based equipment (Ergospirometry 5.22.1.149, CareFusion, Baesweiler, Germany) according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society standards.1,6 Volume was verified daily by using a 3-L calibration syringe; maximal acceptable variability was ± 3%. Barometric pressure and temperature were automatically taken into account by the equipment. All the tests were performed by experienced trained personnel who possessed spirometry certification by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. We used reference values for spirometry obtained in Mexican-American individuals.16

Briefly, the technician explained and demonstrated the maneuver to all the participants. Subsequently, the maneuvers were performed with the subjects seated and wearing a nose clip. Each maneuver consisted of three to ten relaxed respiratory cycles at normal tidal volume to ensure stable end-expiratory lung volume. At the end of a normal expiration, the subjects were asked to perform a rapid, maximal inspiration (in <1 s) to reach total lung capacity (the IC maneuver). Next, they were instructed to perform a slow, prolonged expiration until they reached a plateau of at least 1 s with no increase in volume on the volume-time curve (the VC maneuver). For study purposes, we required a minimum of 3 acceptable maneuvers, with a difference between the 2 highest measures of <0.150 L. The highest value of the 3 acceptable VC maneuvers and the average of at least 3 IC maneuvers obtained were reported.1,4,6 Our intra-test coefficient of variation for IC as well as for VC was 3 ± 2%.

Statistical Analysis

We planned to study 300 individuals ages ≥ 9 y, half were females. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population. IC and slow VC were modeled by multiple linear regression. Age and anthropometric variables (height, weight, BMI) were used to generate predictive equations by selecting those with biologic plausibility, higher coefficients of determination (R2), and lower standard error of estimation separately for males and females. Body surface area was estimated according to Haycock: 0.024265 × height0.3964 × weight0.5378. Reference equations were generated for the 50th and 5th percentiles to indicate the average and the lower limit of normal, respectively. Finally, we compared the participant's measured IC and VC expressed as the percent of predicted by using our reference equation with the same IC and VC values expressed as the percent of predicted of previously published equations3,17–23 when using paired t tests. Obtaining subject values that average >100% predicted by a published equation would imply that the source population had an IC or VC on average lower than our studied population. All statistical analyses were performed with the STATA v. 12 statistical software package (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas). Statistical significance was established at a P < .05.

Results

A total of 457 subjects were recruited, but 16 were excluded (3 smokers, 7 high-performance athletes, and 6 individuals were obese). Hence, 441 Mexico City residents without pulmonary disease were included. The subjects were ages 9–81 y, with a mean age of 38 ± 18 y, median age of 32 (interquartile range, 9.2–81) y, 45% male (n = 199), and non-obese (BMI, 25.05 ± 4.21 kg/m2). The baseline data of the study population by sex, with expected differences between males and females in lung function, are shown in Table 1. The participants had FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC within normal range, and the percent of predicted was similar in both females and males. The potential participants who responded to an invitation to participate in the study were predominantly young adults, with only a smaller proportion of elderly men and women.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Characteristics of the Population

As demonstrated in Figure 1, VC and IC increased during growth up to adolescence in both males and females but then there was a slow, progressive decrease from age 30 y onward. We found a significant difference in average ± SD annual IC decline between females and males after age 30 y: in males, this was 11 ± 5.4 mL, whereas, in females, this was 20.8 ± 2.9 mL (P = .046). For VC, a significant decline after age 30 y in females was 31 ± 3.4 mL, and 27 ± 9.9 mL (mean ± SD) for males after age 40 y.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Distribution of measured vital capacity and inspiratory capacity according to age for both sexes (men [A and C] and women [B and D]). Solid lines show the median (50th percentile) of the prediction values, and the dotted line represents the lower limit of normality (5th percentile).

In the univariate analysis (Table 2), height, weight, BMI and BSA proved to be significantly associated with IC; whereas age, height, weight, body surface area were significantly associated with VC. We tested interaction terms between sex and age2, but the inclusion of these terms did not add to the model, and the coefficients did not reach statistical significance. The models proposed in our study, as in previous studies (Table 3),3,17–23 included as predicting variables, age, weight, height, BMI, and their squared terms, and were selected with the objective of optimizing R2 but also the Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion. Best equations are shown in Tables 4 and 5, with an R2 for IC of 0.42–0.44 and for VC, of 0.61–0.63. Residuals of the proposed equations had a random distribution as required by multiple regression models.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Correlation Coefficients for IC and Slow VC

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Number of Subjects Included in Different Studies of IC (upper lines) and VC (lower lines), and Results of the Study Participants Expressed as Percentage of Predicted

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4.

Best Predicting Equations From This Study for VC

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 5.

Best Predicting Equations From This Study for IC

Measured IC and VC expressed as percentage of predicted by previously published reference equations are presented in Table 3. Measured IC and VC expressed as percentage of predicted by our equation were mean ± SD 99.9 ± 12% and 99.9 ± 15%, respectively. On average, our study population had IC significantly > 100% of predicted for all compiled reference equations, except for values published by Tantucci et al 3 (including as a predictor BMI, P = .14). Measured VC, expressed as a percent of predicted, was significantly > 100% p when using Cordero et al23 and Caussade et al22 reference values but significantly < 100% when using Roca et al17 (which included BMI) (Figs. 2⇓⇓–5).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Comparison of the regression line for measurements of inspiratory capacity in men with those previously published for other populations.3,17–23 BSA = body surface area; BMI = body mass index.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Comparison of the regression line for measurements of inspiratory capacity in women with those previously published for other populations.3,17–23 BSA = body surface area; BMI = body mass index.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Comparison of the regression line for measurements of vital capacity in men with those previously published for other populations.3,17–23 BSA = body surface area; BMI = body mass index.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Comparison of the regression line for measurements of vital capacity in women with those previously published for other populations.3,17–23 BSA = body surface area; BMI = body mass index.

Discussion

This cross-sectional study described the changes in IC and slow VC in residents of Mexico City who lived 2,240 m above sea level from childhood to old age. It, therefore, spanned such important stages as the growth, plateau, and aging of lung function by using current equipment and procedures. The main predictors of IC and VC were sex, age, and height, but, in general, the IC measured was higher than that predicted by other studies,3,17–23 after adjusting for sex, height, age, and weight. In our analysis, we found a coefficient of variation for IC of mean ± SD 3 ± 2%; in other study, this has been found to be mean ± SD 5 ± 3%1 The study population was predominantly Mexican mestizo with an important contribution of Amerindian genes, in a country where 32% of the total population resides at >2,000 m above sea level.12 Previously, work by our group found that spirometry values obtained from a Mexican population, adjusted by sex, height, and age, were higher than for other population groups.13 This may be due to a greater upper-body-segment to lower-body-segment ratio, which implied a larger thorax for height.

Although the explanation for these findings is currently unknown, residing at moderate altitude with chronic hypoxia may be a participating factor,25–27 together with genetic contributions due primarily to the higher proportion of Amerindian genes.27 Another possibility could be a relative increase in chest dimensions compared with height, as described for undernourished and underserved groups with short stature (stunting), which leads to shorter extremities.28 Another study demonstrated that VC and alveolar capillary surface increased in natives at high altitude compared with sea-level populations.29 It is widely accepted that several factors may lead to large lungs in these individuals, such as the life-long exposure to hypoxia and genetic factors. The pattern of growth in body size and lung volume at high altitude is different from that observed at sea level and includes a larger lung volume and chest dimensions, particularly a larger residual volume14; also, infants and toddlers born and residing at high altitudes had higher functional residual capacity compared with subjects at sea level, likely secondary to an increase in alveolar number.28

Our study found that IC and VC increased similarly in girls and boys during growth and development before reaching a short plateau, followed by a slow decline after age 30 y. This concurred with the phase of pulmonary growth and maturation in the first 2 decades of life, when this process accelerates to obtain its maximal function at approximately age 20 y in women and age 25 y in men. The annual IC drop after age 30 y was, on average, 10 mL in men and 20 mL in women (P = .046). The annual drop in VC after age 30 y in females was 31 mL (P < .001), but, for men, a significant VC decline occurred only after age 40 y, and averaged 27 mL/y (P < .001). The observed IC drop per year was less than that reported for FEV1 and IC in another study.11 At present, we do not know whether this decline in women was due to menopause or whether it was associated with lower pulmonary function, perhaps due to the effect of sex hormones on lung growth, muscle strength and function, and smooth-muscle relaxation in the airway.30 There also are reports that women experience a more-rapid increase in the kyphosis angle after age 40 y, which reaches its highest value after age 55 y.31

The decline of IC with aging can be explained by reduced lung elastic recoil, greater thoracic rigidity, and lower muscular strength.31,32 An increase in air trapping as large as 50% between ages 20 and 70 y, accompanied by decreases in VC to ∼75% of best values, was previously described.32 In contrast, total lung capacity does not seem to be modified by aging.33,34 It should be noted that the change in IC with age was not considered relevant in some of the equations previously described in Roca et al17 and Quanjer et al).11

Obtaining IC by spirometry is simpler than by plethysmography. Also, this procedure can identify hyperinflation at rest, in patients who experience postural changes, and during exercise.3,35 IC at rest is described as an independent risk factor in exacerbation of COPD and mortality by any cause.4,6,36 Studies of subjects with COPD documented that air trapping develops as this condition progresses and results in decreased IC.37–39 Similarly, Pellegrino et als5 demonstrated that an increase in IC after bronchodilator use entails a reduction in dynamic hyperinflation that, in turn, improves exercise capacity and reduces dyspnea.5 Up to 60% of patients with pulmonary hypertension present abnormalities in IC both at rest and during exercise, and individuals with decreased IC have a greater risk of mortality by any cause.40

In healthy individuals and in patients with mild obstruction, the difference between VC and FVC is practically zero; however, this difference increases in the presence of greater airway obstruction.8,9 FEV1/VC detected the presence of airway obstruction in more individuals than did FEV1/FVC.8 For example, the prevalence of COPD in the Swedish study increased from 14% to 16.8% when VC was used instead of only FVC, and this was independent of whether the FEV1/FVC < 0.7 or the lower limit of normal definition of COPD was applied.41 Finding that VC is higher than FVC indicated small-airway collapse and air trapping, and it may further indicate that static pulmonary hyperinflation is present.9

Our study had limitations. First, IC was measured only by slow spirometry; therefore, we were not able to determine the behavior of residual volumen (RV) or total lung capacity in our participants. However, total lung capacity was not observed to change with age in previous studies,33,34 and spirometric measurements of IC were shown to have a small coefficient of variation (for VC = 0.035) in most participants when studied with current equipment and methods. Previously, predicted IC was measured nearly exclusively by plethysmography or by the inert gas method, but the inert gas method rendered it more difficult to obtain simple reliable measurements. In contrast, spirometric IC and VC measurements can be performed easily and accurately in different settings. Second, this was a cross-sectional study, which implies that many birth cohorts were included in our study and results often differed from those obtained from longitudinal equations.42 Third, our population was not obtained by a sampling method representative of the population; however, the participants were more numerous than in previous studies and included a wide age range, which represented a considerable advantage.

Conclusions

The IC in our sample of healthy individuals who lived 2,240 m above sea level was higher than that reported in previous FEV1/FVC < 0.7 studies for European and Latin-American subjects of similar height, sex, and age at sea level. Our study provided a robust IC and VC reference equation for persons who lived at a moderate altitude from childhood to old age.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Rogelio Pérez-Padilla, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Calzada de Tlalpan 4502, Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Ciudad de México (CDMX), México 14080. E-mail: perezpad{at}gmail.com.
  • Dr Thirión-Romero presented a version of this paper at the European Respiratory Society International Congress held September 9–13 2017, in Milan, Italy.

  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2019 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wanger J,
    2. Clausen JL,
    3. Coates A,
    4. Pedersen OF,
    5. Brusasco V,
    6. Burgos F,
    7. et al
    . Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur Respir J 2005;26(3):511–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Stocks J,
    2. Quanjer PH
    . ATS Workshop on Lung Volume Measurements. Official Statement of The European Respiratory Society. Reference values for residual volume, functional residual capacity and total lung capacity Eur Respir J 1995;8(3):492–506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tantucci C,
    2. Pinelli V,
    3. Cossi S,
    4. Guerini M,
    5. Donato F,
    6. Grassi V
    ; SARA Study Group. Reference values and repeatability of inspiratory capacity for men and women aged 65–85. Respir Med 2006;100(5):871–877.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Casanova C,
    2. Cote C,
    3. de Torres JP,
    4. Aguirre-Jaime A,
    5. Marin JM,
    6. Pinto-Plata V,
    7. et al
    . Inspiratory to total lung capacity ratio predicts mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171(6):591–597.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Pellegrino R,
    2. Viegi G,
    3. Brusasco V,
    4. Crapo RO,
    5. Burgos F,
    6. Casaburi R,
    7. et al
    . Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J 2005;26(5):948–968.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tantucci C,
    2. Donati P,
    3. Nicosia F,
    4. Bertella E,
    5. Redolfi S,
    6. De Vecchi M,
    7. et al
    . Inspiratory capacity predicts mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2008;102(4):613–619.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Miller MR,
    2. Hankinson J,
    3. Brusasco V,
    4. Burgos F,
    5. Casaburi R,
    6. Coates A,
    7. et al
    ; ATS/ERS Task Force. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005;26(2):319–338.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Barros AR,
    2. Pires MB,
    3. Raposo NM
    . Importance of slow vital capacity in the detection of airway obstruction. J Bras Pneumol 2013;39(3):317–322.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Yuan W,
    2. He X,
    3. Xu QF,
    4. Wang H-Y,
    5. Casaburi R
    . Increased difference between slow and forced vital capacity is associated with reduced exercise tolerance in COPD patients. BMC Pulm Med 2014;14:16.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Enright PL,
    2. Kronmal RA,
    3. Higgins M,
    4. Schenker M,
    5. Haponik EF
    . Spirometry reference values for women and men 65 to 85 years of age. Cardiovascular health study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147(1):125–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Quanjer PH,
    2. Andersen LH,
    3. Tammeling GJ
    . Static Lung Volumes And Capacities. Clin Respir Physiology 1983;19:11–21.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Pérez-Padilla R
    . Population distribution residing at different altitudes: implications for hypoxemia. Arch Med Res 2002;33(2):162–166.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Pérez-Padilla JR,
    2. Regalado-Pineda J,
    3. Vázquez-García JC
    . Reproducibility of spirometry in Mexican workers and international reference values. Salud Publica Mex 2001;43(2):113–121.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Frisancho AR
    . Developmental functional adaptation to high altitude: review. Am J Hum Biol 2013;25(2):151–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Williams JH Jr.,
    2. Bencowitz HZ
    . Differences in plethysmographic lung volumes. Effects of linked vs unlinked spirometry. Chest 1989;95(1):117–123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Hankinson JL,
    2. Odencrantz JR,
    3. Fedan KB
    . Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159(1):179–187.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Roca J,
    2. Burgos F,
    3. Barberà JA,
    4. Sunyer J,
    5. Rodriguez-Roisin R,
    6. Castellsagué J,
    7. et al
    . Prediction equations for plethysmographic lung volumes. Respir Med 1998;92(3):454–460.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.
    1. Neder JA,
    2. Andreoni S,
    3. Castelo-Filho A,
    4. Nery LE
    . Reference values for lung function tests. I. Static volumes. Braz J Med Biol Res 1999;32(6):703–717.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Lisboa C,
    2. Leiva A,
    3. Pinochet R,
    4. Repetto P,
    5. Borzone G,
    6. Díaz O
    . Reference values for inspiratory capacity in healthy nonsmokers over age 50 years. Arch Bronconeumol 2007;43(9):485–489.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.
    1. Garcia-Rio F,
    2. Dorgham A,
    3. Pino JM,
    4. Villasante C,
    5. Garcia-Quero C,
    6. Alvarez-Sala R
    . Lung volume reference values for women and men 65 to 85 years of age. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;180(11):1083–1091.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.
    1. Marsh S,
    2. Aldington S,
    3. Williams M,
    4. Weatherall M,
    5. Shirtcliffe P,
    6. McNaughton A,
    7. et al
    . Complete reference ranges for pulmonary function tests from a single New Zealand population. N Z Med J 2006;119(1244):U2281.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Caussade S,
    2. Pulgar D,
    3. Vega-Briceno L,
    4. Viviani P,
    5. Diaz C,
    6. Contreras I,
    7. Sanchez I
    . Plethysmographic lung volumes in normal Chilean children and adolescents. Pediatr Pulmonol 2008;43(9):866–873.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Cordero PJ,
    2. Morales P,
    3. Benlloch E,
    4. Miravet L,
    5. Cebrian J
    . Static lung volumes: reference values from a Latin population of Spanish descent. Respiration 1999;66(3):242–250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.
    1. Quanjer PH,
    2. Stanojevic S,
    3. Cole TJ,
    4. Baur X,
    5. Hall GL,
    6. Culver BH,
    7. et al
    ; ERS Global Lung Function Initiative. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 2012;40(6):1324–1343.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Schoene RB
    . Limits of human lung function at high altitude. J Exp Biol 2001;204(Pt 18):3121–3127.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.
    1. Cogo A
    . The lung at high altitude. Multidiscip Respir Med 2011;6(1):14–15.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kiyamu M,
    2. Bigham A,
    3. Parra E,
    4. León-Velarde F,
    5. Rivera-Chira M,
    6. Brutsaert TD
    . Developmental and genetic components explain enhanced pulmonary volumes of female peruvian quechua. Am J Phys Anthropol 2012;148(4):534–542.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Llapur CJ,
    2. Martínez MR,
    3. Caram MM,
    4. Bonilla F,
    5. Cabana C,
    6. Yu Z,
    7. Tepper RS
    . Increased lung volume in infants and toddlers at high compared to low altitude. Pediatr Pulmonol 2013;48(12):1224–1230.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Brody JS,
    2. Lahiri S,
    3. Simpser M,
    4. Motoyama EK,
    5. Velasquez T
    . Lung elasticity and airway dynamics in Peruvian natives to high altitude. J Appl Physiol 1977;42(2):245–251.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Pata O,
    2. Atiş S,
    3. Utku Oz A,
    4. Yazici G,
    5. Tok E,
    6. Pata C,
    7. et al
    . The effects of hormone replacement therapy type on pulmonary functions in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 2003;46(3):213–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lowery EM,
    2. Brubaker AL,
    3. Kuhlmann E,
    4. Kovacs EJ
    . The aging lung. Clin Interv Aging 2013;8:1489–1496.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Janssens JP,
    2. Pache JC,
    3. Nicod LP
    . Physiological changes in respiratory function associated with ageing. Eur Respir J 1999;13(1):197–205.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Lum S,
    2. Stocks J,
    3. Stanojevic S,
    4. Wade A,
    5. Robinson P,
    6. Gustafsson P,
    7. et al
    . Age and height dependence of lung clearance index and functional residual capacity. Eur Respir J 2013;41(6):1371–1377.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Verbanck S,
    2. Thompson BR,
    3. Schuermans D,
    4. Kalsi H,
    5. Biddiscombe M,
    6. Stuart-Andrews C,
    7. et al
    . Ventilation heterogeneity in the acinar and conductive zones of the normal ageing lung. Thorax 2012;67(9):789–795.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. O'Donnell DE,
    2. Guenette JA,
    3. Maltais F,
    4. Webb KA
    . Decline of resting inspiratory capacity in COPD: the impact on breathing pattern, dyspnea, and ventilatory capacity during exercise. Chest 2012;141(3):753–762.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Guenette JA,
    2. Chin RC,
    3. Cory JM,
    4. Webb KA,
    5. O'Donnell DE
    . Inspiratory Capacity during Exercise: Measurement, Analysis, and Interpretation. Pulm Med 2013;2013:95608.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Celli BR,
    2. Decramer M,
    3. Lystig T,
    4. Kesten S,
    5. Tashkin DP
    . Longitudinal inspiratory capacity changes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res 2012;13:66.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.
    1. Trigo MJM,
    2. Sánchez-Barón
    . Valoración funcional del paciente con EPOC [Functional assessment of the patient with COPD]. Arch Bronconeumol 2005;41:18–23.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Di Marco F,
    2. Milic-Emili J,
    3. Boveri B,
    4. Carlucci P,
    5. Santus P,
    6. Casanova F,
    7. et al
    . Effect of inhaled bronchodilators on inspiratory capacity and dyspnea at rest in COPD. Eur Respir J 2003;21(1):86–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Richter MJ,
    2. Tiede H,
    3. Morty RE,
    4. Voswinckel R,
    5. Seeger W,
    6. Schulz R,
    7. et al
    . The prognostic significance of inspiratory capacity in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Respiration 2014;88(1):24–30.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Torén K,
    2. Olin AC,
    3. Lindberg A,
    4. Vikgren J,
    5. Schiöler L,
    6. Brandberg J,
    7. et al
    . Vital capacity and COPD: the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS). Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016;11:927–933.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Martínez-Briseño D,
    2. Fernández-Plata R,
    3. Gochicoa-Rangel L,
    4. Torre-Bouscoulet L,
    5. Rojas-Martínez R,
    6. Mendoza L,
    7. et al
    . Longitudinal lung function growth of Mexican children compared with international studies. PLoS One 2013;8(10):e77403.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 64 (2)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 64, Issue 2
1 Feb 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inspiratory Capacity and Vital Capacity of Healthy Subjects 9–81 Years of Age at Moderate-High Altitude
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Inspiratory Capacity and Vital Capacity of Healthy Subjects 9–81 Years of Age at Moderate-High Altitude
Silvia Cid-Juárez, Ireri Thirión-Romero, Luis Torre-Bouscoulet, Laura Gochicoa-Rangel, David Martínez-Briseño, Iván Y Hernández-Paniagua, Olivia Delgadillo-Ruiz, Selene Guerrero-Zúñiga, Rodrigo Del Río-Hidalgo, Daniel Cortés-Medina, Peter E Bapo-López, Pablo León-Gómez, Anaid Bautista-Bernal, Rogelio Pérez-Padilla
Respiratory Care Feb 2019, 64 (2) 153-160; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06284

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Inspiratory Capacity and Vital Capacity of Healthy Subjects 9–81 Years of Age at Moderate-High Altitude
Silvia Cid-Juárez, Ireri Thirión-Romero, Luis Torre-Bouscoulet, Laura Gochicoa-Rangel, David Martínez-Briseño, Iván Y Hernández-Paniagua, Olivia Delgadillo-Ruiz, Selene Guerrero-Zúñiga, Rodrigo Del Río-Hidalgo, Daniel Cortés-Medina, Peter E Bapo-López, Pablo León-Gómez, Anaid Bautista-Bernal, Rogelio Pérez-Padilla
Respiratory Care Feb 2019, 64 (2) 153-160; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06284
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • inspiratory capacity
  • reference values
  • altitude
  • pulmonary function tests
  • aging
  • lung volumes

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire