Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Article CommentaryEditor's Commentary

Editor's Commentary

Respiratory Care February 2019, 64 (2) i;
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This months' Editor's Choice is a bench evaluation of continuous flow and pulsed dose oxygen delivery from portable oxygen concentrators (POCs). Chen and col-leagues used a sophisticated 3D-printed replica of the hu-man respiratory system to determine the volume of oxygen reaching gas exchange units. They found that the highest oxygen delivery was achieved at the highest pulse dose settings, but that continuous flow delivered the greatest absolute volume-averaged FIO2. They conclude that while pulse dose was a more efficient mode of oxygen delivery, continuous flow delivered a greater absolute volume of oxygen per breath. The accompanying editorial describes the issues related to POCs and how the operation of these devices befuddles patients, confuses caregivers, and often obfuscates the goal of oxygen delivery. Targeted oxygen saturation should be preferred to an order of flow and per-formance of POCs made understandable for stakeholders.

Nakanishi et al compare passive and active humidifica-tion in adult subjects with tracheostomy. Not surprisingly, heated humidification far outperformed the heat-and-moisture exchanger with respect to absolute humidity. The major difference being temperature and absolute hu-midity, as relative humidity was 100% with both devices. Gomaa opines that the differences here are expected but that cost and portability also play important roles in humid-ification device decision-making.

Mendes and coworkers describe the impact of diaphrag-matic breathing exercise with and without pursed lips in a group of COPD subjects over a 4-week period of obser-vation. The main outcomes were evaluations of chest wall kinematics, breathlessness, and chest wall asynchrony. They report that both breathing exercises studied reduced breath-ing frequency, but increased chest wall asynchrony com-pared to quiet breathing. Dyspnea remained unaffected.

Misu et al describe the role of exercise-induced oxygen desaturation in monitoring functional decline in subjects with COPD. They report that exercise-induced desat-uration during a 6-min walk test predicted a decline in functional capacity in these subjects. These findings were mirrored by airflow limitation.

The impact of altitude on physiology is a frequent field of study. Cid-Juárez and others report on the inspiratory and vital capacity of subjects living in Mexico City at a moderate altitude (2,200 m). They found that inspiratory capacity in healthy subjects at this altitude was higher than reported val-ues at sea level for same height, gender, and age. These data are important for pulmonary function interpretation.

Alghamdi et al endeavored to describe the perceptions of respiratory therapy students on the clinical learning environment using an evaluation scale. In the small sample (N= 34) of students they studied, the majority rated the clinical learning environment positively and were satisfied with the clinical instructor/team model.

COPD is a major health burden around the world. Quiros Roldan and coworkers describe the incidence of COPD in a cohort of subjects with HIV infection. They found that COPD was underdiagnosed in HIV-infected individuals and encourage evaluation of these patients for chronic respiratory disease.

Oates and others evaluated the difference in objective and self-reported adherence to airway clearance therapy in subjects with cystic fibrosis. All subjects were using high frequency chest wall oscillation equipped with a data log-ger to record use. They found that only a third of subjects had an adherence > 80% of prescribed measured by the device. In contrast, two-thirds of subjects self-reported high adherence. Subjects prescribed > 60 min of airway clearance therapy a day were 3 times as likely to over-report adherence. Lower income and therapy in multiple households increased over-reporting.

Meys et al describe the use of a mobile device to record inspiratory capacity during a 6-min walk test. The mobile system was reasonably tolerated and could differentiate between healthy subjects and those with COPD. The utility of this device in clinical practice is yet to be proven.

Ozsoy and coworkers describe the primary factors impacting activities of daily living in subjects with COPD using the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale. In a small group of subjects (N= 44) they found that function-al exercise capacity and expiratory muscle strength were associated with a reduction in activities of daily living. They suggest that programs to improve functional exercise capacity are warranted.

Tracheobronchopathia osteochondroplastica (TO) are benign lesions of tracheal and bronchial mucosa with multiple nodular hyperplasia of bone or cartilage tissue protruding into the airway lumen. Meng and others report the major clinical findings in a group of 73 subjects with TO. Cough was the primary presenting symptom, followed by hemoptysis. The infrequent incidence of TO requires that diagnosis be accomplished using clinical suspicion, bronchoscopy, histopathology, and radiographic findings.

A number of recent studies have evaluated transcuta-neous monitoring of carbon dioxide (TcCO2) in pediatric subjects. Bhalla and others compare arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) to TcCO2 in 184 pediatric subjects, the majority of whom were receiving mechanical ventilation. They also attempted to predict a second PaCO2 using data from the first comparison. They concluded that TcCO2 was a useful adjunct monitoring method, but it cannot reliably replace PaCO2 measurement.

Caudron et al provide a review of pulmonary thromboses in pediatrics ARDS and advance an algorithm triggered by an increase in deadspace to identify patients at risk. They suggest that early identification and treatment may improve outcomes. Karthika and others describe the use of lung ultrasound in clinical medicine and the role of the respiratory therapist in bringing this technology to the bedside.

  • Copyright © 2019 by Daedalus Enterprises
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 64 (2)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 64, Issue 2
1 Feb 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor's Commentary
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor's Commentary
Respiratory Care Feb 2019, 64 (2) i;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Editor's Commentary
Respiratory Care Feb 2019, 64 (2) i;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire