Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
EditorialEditorial

The Current State of Home Mechanical Ventilation in Children

L Denise Willis
Respiratory Care December 2020, 65 (12) 1936-1938; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.08412
L Denise Willis
Arkansas Children’s HospitalRespiratory Care ServicesLittle Rock, Arkansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

One of the first portable ventilators designed for use outside of the hospital was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1977, and home mechanical ventilation became a reality for many children in 1981 with the passage of a Medicaid waiver that provided reimbursement for ventilator-dependent patients beyond the ICU setting.1 Since that time, portable home ventilators have become more sophisticated, smaller, lighter, and have a longer battery life allowing for greater patient mobility. Advances in both medical care and technology have contributed to the growing numbers of children receiving home mechanical ventilation. Medically stable ventilator-dependent children have a better quality of life and improved psychosocial development outside of the hospital setting.2,3 Furthermore, the cost for supporting home mechanical ventilation is typically less than continued care in the hospital.4-6

Children who require home mechanical ventilation are a diverse, complex, high-risk patient population. Although chronic respiratory failure is the common factor necessitating long-term ventilator support, these medically fragile children have varying underlying diagnoses such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neuromuscular disease, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, or other conditions resulting in chronic pulmonary insufficiency, as well as a multitude of different comorbidities. Some children are eventually liberated from mechanical ventilation, while others require support for the duration of their life. In both cases, many children attend school, participate in extracurricular activities with their peers, and have hobbies, hopes, and dreams, and they become young adults who graduate college and enter the workforce.

Several studies have described local or regional pediatric home ventilator populations, trends, and outcomes over periods ranging from 10 to 30 years in the both the United States and around the world, including Canada, the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, and many others.7-15 In this issue of the Journal, Borges and colleagues16 report outcomes from a pediatric home care service in Brazil. The authors retrospectively reviewed records for children receiving invasive home mechanical ventilation over a 10-y period. There were 27 children included in the study, with the majority having a diagnosis of cerebral palsy. The main cause of readmission was respiratory illness attributed to tracheitis. Nearly half of the children died over the course of 10 y, with most of the deaths occurring in the hospital setting. The authors also report that readmission within 6 months of hospital discharge was associated with an increased chance of death.

This paper contributes to the growing body of literature depicting populations, trends, and outcomes of children dependent upon invasive home ventilation. However, the sample size is considerably smaller compared to other studies occurring over the same or shorter length of time.8-10,13,14 This could be due to demographic differences, the geographic region, the availability of resources, or the fact that the study was limited to a single home care service. Many of the other descriptive studies included children receiving noninvasive ventilation, which may have led to a larger number of subjects, whereas this study included only invasive support.10-16

Most of the children in this study were reported to have a diagnosis of cerebral palsy, which is a common neurodevelopmental disorder causing physical disability.16 Cerebral palsy is often considered an umbrella term because it encompasses a wide range of symptom severity and associated comorbidities that may or may not include pulmonary manisfestations.17 Children diagnosed with cerebral palsy who have respiratory involvement are at risk for respiratory failure due to impaired cough, upper-airway obstruction, and sleep-disordered breathing.17

Readmissions are, unfortunately, quite common for children requiring home ventilator support and are frequently related to acute respiratory illness. A retrospective cohort study of 109 invasively ventilated children reported a 40% incidence of readmissions and identified pneumonia and tracheitis as the primary causes.18 Other studies evaluating readmissions following tracheostomy placement or initiation of home ventilation reported similar results.19,20 Findings from the study by Borges et al16 also noted respiratory infection, namely tracheitis, as a main cause of readmissions. The term tracheitis is frequently used when describing artificial airway-associated tracheobronchitis, which is often characterized by fever, increased tracheal secretions, and increased work of breathing.21 Artificial airway-tracheobronchitis may be a more accurate designation for tracheitis in invasively ventilated children. There are no evidence-based standards for diagnosing or treating this common occurrence in this patient population.

A notable finding from the study by Borges et al16 was the 10% greater chance of death associated with hospital readmissions occurring within 6 months following discharge (P = .02). However, this should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size from a single pediatric home service. The authors reported that nearly half (13 of 27) the children in their study died over the 10-y period and that 76.9% of deaths occurred in the hospital.16 These findings are consistent with another study that evaluated deaths in children receiving invasive home ventilation in which the majority of deaths occurred in the hospital setting.22

Overall, the results from this study of invasive home mechanical ventilation in Brazil are in agreement with the findings of other comparable studies. Ventilator-dependent children typically have substantial medical needs and utilize a higher proportion of health care resources compared to children with other chronic conditions.23 Despite the increasing numbers of ventilator-dependent children and improved technology, there are relatively few current guidelines and no database or registry.24,25 While some individual institutional and collaborative registries may exist in the United States, there is not an established national home ventilator registry.1 A registry of this nature could help identify more accurate estimates of the number of ventilator-dependent individuals, develop evidence-based standards of care and updated guidelines, discover other trends and outcomes that may be unrecognized, and provide a framework for more research to assist with improving care for this group of patients. Ideally, a comprehensive registry would include both adults and children.

The diversity and complexity of the ventilator-dependent population as a whole makes it challenging to create universal guidelines. However, there are many opportunities for future research on various aspects that could potentially benefit the entire group. Specific examples of this include standardized treatment of airway-associated tracheobronchitis, development of an evidence-based practice for transitioning from an ICU to portable home ventilator, and targeted strategies to reduce unplanned readmissions, as well as numerous other possibilities. More influential advocates are needed, such as the late Katie Beckett, who experienced long-term ventilator dependence and made a significant impact, to continue advancing the care of this fragile patient population.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: L Denise Willis MSc RRT RRT-NPS AE-C. E-mail: willisld{at}archildrens.org
  • See the Original Study on Page 1800

  • The author has disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. King AC
    . Long-term home mechanical ventilation in the United States. Respir Care 2012;57(6):921-932.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Baldwin-Myers AS,
    2. Oppenheimer EA
    . Quality of life and quality of care data from a 7-year pilot project for home ventilator patients. J Ambul Care Manage 1996;19(1):46-59.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Murphy J
    . Medically stable children in PICU: better at home. Paediatr Nurs 2008;20(1):14-16.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sahetya S,
    2. Allgood S,
    3. Gay PC,
    4. Lechtzin N
    . Long-term mechanical ventilation. Clin Chest Med 2016;37(4):753-763.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.
    1. Sobotka SA,
    2. Foster C,
    3. Lynch E,
    4. Hird-McCorry L,
    5. Goodman DM
    . Attributable delay of discharge for children with long-term mechanical ventilation. J Pediatr 2019;212:166-171.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fields AI,
    2. Rosenblatt A,
    3. Pollack MM,
    4. Kaufman J
    . Home care cost-effectiveness for respiratory technology-dependent children. Am J Dis Child 1991;145(7):729-733.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Amirnovin R,
    2. Aghamohammadi S,
    3. Riley C,
    4. Woo MS,
    5. Del Castillo S
    . Analysis of a pediatric home mechanical ventilator population. Respir Care 2018;63(5):558-564.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Overman AE,
    2. Liu M,
    3. Kurachek SC,
    4. Shreve MR,
    5. Maynard RC,
    6. Mammel MC,
    7. Moore BM
    . Tracheostomy for infants requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: 10 years’ experience. Pediatrics 2013;131(5):e1491-e1496.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.
    1. Gowans M,
    2. Keenan HT,
    3. Bratton SL
    . The population prevalence of children receiving invasive home mechanical ventilation in Utah. Pediatr Pulmonol 2007;42(3):231-236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Graham RJ,
    2. Fleegler EW,
    3. Robinson WM
    . Chronic ventilator need in the community: a 2005 pediatric census of Massachusetts. Pediatrics 2007;119(6):e1280-e1287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.
    1. Amin R,
    2. Sayal P,
    3. Syed F,
    4. Chaves A,
    5. Moraes TJ,
    6. MacLusky I
    . Pediatric long-term home mechanical ventilation: twenty years of follow-up from one canadian center. Pediatr Pulmonol 2014;49(8):816-824.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.
    1. McDougall CM,
    2. Adderley RJ,
    3. Wensley DF,
    4. Seear MD
    . Long-term ventilation in children: longitudinal trends and outcomes. Arch Dis Child 2013;98(9):660-665.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wallis C,
    2. Paton JY,
    3. Beaton S,
    4. Jardine E
    . Children on long-term ventilatory support: 10 years of progress. Arch Dis Child 2011;96(11):998-1002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Racca F,
    2. Berta G,
    3. Sequi M,
    4. Bignamini E,
    5. Capello E,
    6. Cutrera R,
    7. et al
    . Long-term ventilation of children in Italy: a national survey. Pediatr Pulmonol 2011;46(6):566-572.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Paulides FM,
    2. Plötz FB,
    3. Verweij-van den Oudenrijn LP,
    4. van Gestel JPJ,
    5. Kampelmacher MJ
    . Thirty years of home mechanical ventilation of children: escalating need for pediatric intensive care beds. Intensive Care Med 2012;38(5):847-852.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Borges EF,
    2. Borges-Junior LH,
    3. Carvalho AJL,
    4. Ferreira HM,
    5. Hattori WT,
    6. de Oliveria Azevedo VMG
    . Invasive home mechanical ventilation: 10-year experience of a pediatric home care service. Respir Care 2020;65(12):1800-1804.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Myers LL,
    2. Nerminathan A,
    3. Fitzgerald DA,
    4. Chien J,
    5. Middleton A,
    6. Waugh MC,
    7. Paget SP
    . Transition to adult care for young people with cerebral palsy. Paediatr Respir Rev 2020;33:16-23.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kun SS,
    2. Edwards JD,
    3. Ward SLD,
    4. Keens TG
    . Hospital readmissions for newly discharged pediatric home mechanical ventilation patients. Pediatr Pulmonol 2012;47(4):409-414.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Russell CJ,
    2. Simon TD,
    3. Mamey MR,
    4. Newth CJL,
    5. Neely MN
    . Pseudo-monas aeruginosa and post-tracheotomy bacterial respiratory tract infection readmissions. Pediatr Pulmonol 2017;52(9):1212-1218.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Yu H,
    2. Mamey MR,
    3. Russell CJ
    . Factors associated with 30-day all-cause hospital readmission after tracheotomy in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2017;103:137-141.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Woods CR
    . Tracheobronchitis associated with tracheostomy tubes and endotracheal intubation in children. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/tracheobronchitis-associated-with-tracheostomy-tubes-and-endotracheal-intubation-in-children. Accessed August 5, 2020.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Edwards JD,
    2. Kun SS,
    3. Keens TG
    . Outcomes and causes of death in children on home mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy: an institutional and literature review. J Pediatr 2010;157(6):955-959.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Benneyworth BD,
    2. Gebremariam A,
    3. Clark SJ,
    4. Shanley TP,
    5. Davis MM
    . Inpatient health care utilization for children’s dependent on long-term mechanical ventilation. Pediatrics 2011;127(6):e1553-e1541.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    American Association for Respiratory Care. AARC clinical practice guideline: long-term mechanical ventilation in the home – 2007 revision & update. Respir Care 2007;52(8):1056-1062.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Sterni LM,
    2. Collaco JM,
    3. Baker CD,
    4. Carroll JL,
    5. Sharma GD,
    6. Brozek JL,
    7. et al
    . An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: pediatric chronic home invasive ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193(8):e16-e35.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 65 (12)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 65, Issue 12
1 Dec 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Current State of Home Mechanical Ventilation in Children
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Current State of Home Mechanical Ventilation in Children
L Denise Willis
Respiratory Care Dec 2020, 65 (12) 1936-1938; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.08412

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Current State of Home Mechanical Ventilation in Children
L Denise Willis
Respiratory Care Dec 2020, 65 (12) 1936-1938; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.08412
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire