Performance Evaluation of Nasal Prong Interface for CPAP Delivery on a Critical Care Ventilator: A Bench Experiment

References

1. 1.↵
   Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. Respiratory support in preterm infants at birth. Pediatrics 2014;133(1):171-174.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Subramaniam P,
   2. Ho JJ,
   3. Davis PG

   . Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preventing morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;6:CD001243.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Owen LS,
   2. Morley CJ,
   3. Dawson JA,
   4. Davis PG

   . Effects of non-synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation on spontaneous breathing preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011;96(6):F422-F428.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Moretti C,
   2. Gizzi C,
   3. Papoff P,
   4. Lampariello S,
   5. Capoferri M,
   6. Calcagnini G,
   7. Bucci G

   . Comparing the effects of nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation in very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 1999;56(2–3):167-177.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Roberts CT,
   2. Owen LS,
   3. Manley BJ,
   4. Frøisland DH,
   5. Donath SM,
   6. Dalziel KM,
   7. et al

   . Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2016;375(12):1142-1151.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. 6.
   1. Murki S,
   2. Singh J,
   3. Khant C,
   4. Dash SW,
   5. Oleti TP,
   6. Joy P,
   7. Kabra NS

   . High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for primary respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology 2018;113(3):235-241.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. 7.
   1. Shin J,
   2. Park K,
   3. Lee EH,
   4. Choi BM

   . Humidified high flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as an initial respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial. J Korean Med Sci 2017;32(4):650-655.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Uchiyama A,
   2. Okazaki K,
   3. Kondo M,
   4. Oka S,
   5. Motojima Y,
   6. Namba F,
   7. et al

   . Randomized controlled trial of high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants after extubation. Pediatrics 2020;146(6):e20201101.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Nzegwu NI,
   2. Mack T,
   3. DellaVentura R,
   4. Dunphy L,
   5. Koval N,
   6. Levit O,
   7. Bhandari V

   . Systematic use of the RAM nasal cannula in the Yale-New Haven Children’s Hospital neonatal intensive care unit: a quality improvement project. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28(6):718-721.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Gerdes JS,
    2. Sivieri EM,
    3. Abbasi S

    . Factors influencing delivered mean airway pressure during nasal CPAP with the RAM cannula. Pediatr Pulmonol 2016;51(1):60-69.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Iyer NP,
    2. Chatburn R

    . Evaluation of a nasal cannula in noninvasive ventilation using a lung simulator. Respir Care 2015;60(4):508-512.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. DiBlasi RM,
    2. Salyer JW,
    3. Zignego JC,
    4. Redding GJ,
    5. Richardson CP

    . The impact of imposed expiratory resistance in neonatal mechanical ventilation: a laboratory evaluation. Respir Care 2008;53(11):1450-1460.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Coffey PS,
    2. Saxon EA,
    3. Narayanan I,
    4. DiBlasi RM

    . Performance and acceptability of two self-inflating bag-mask neonatal resuscitator designs. Respir Care 2015;60(9):1227-1237.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Ramanathan R,
    2. Crotwell D,
    3. DiBlasi R

    . A novel means for delivering nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in infants: the nasal cannula (abstract). Respir Care 2010;55(11):1582.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.
    1. Bailes SA,
    2. Firestone KS,
    3. Dunn DK,
    4. McNinch NL,
    5. Brown MF,
    6. Volsko TA

    . Evaluating the effect of flow and interface type on pressures delivered with bubble CPAP in a simulated model. Respir Care 2016;61(3):333-339.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Green EA,
    2. Dawson JA,
    3. Davis PG,
    4. De Paoli AG,
    5. Roberts CT

    . Assessment of resistance of nasal continuous positive airway pressure interfaces. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2019;104(5):F535-F539.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Fernandes ND,
    2. Chung E,
    3. Salt MD,
    4. Ejiofor B,
    5. Carroll RW,
    6. Kacmarek RM

    . Measured CPAP in a noninvasive pediatric airway and lung model. Respir Care 2021;66(1):87-94.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Singh N,
    2. McNally MJ,
    3. Darnall RA

    . Does the RAM cannula provide continuous positive airway pressure as effectively as the Hudson prongs in preterm neonates? Amer J Perinatol 2019;36(8):849-854.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Gokce IK,
    2. Kaya H,
    3. Ozdemir R

    . A randomized trial comparing the short binasal prong to the RAM cannula for noninvasive ventilation support of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Med 2021;34(12):1868-1874.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.↵
    1. Drescher GS,
    2. Hughes CW

    . Comparison of interfaces for the delivery of noninvasive respiratory support to low birthweight infants. Respir Care 2018;63(10):1197-1206.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text