Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Effects of Pneumatic Tube Transport on Blood Gas and Supplemental Analytes

Phillip R Jensen, Ryan L Aramaki, Steve C Mannebach and Boaz A Markewitz
Respiratory Care October 2021, 66 (10) 1567-1571; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07974
Phillip R Jensen
Pulmonary Laboratory, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Ryan L Aramaki
Pulmonary Laboratory, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve C Mannebach
Pulmonary Laboratory, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boaz A Markewitz
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Respiratory, Critical Care, Occupation (Pulmonary) Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pneumatic tube transport of blood gas samples is a common method of delivery within a facility. The effects of pneumatic tube transport on blood gas analysis has been studied. However, other analytes that are often assessed in blood gas analysis (eg, electrolytes, metabolites, and oximetry) are not typically included in these studies. We sought to investigate the impact of pneumatic tube transport on some of these other analytes.

METHODS: The study was conducted at the blood gas laboratory at the University of Utah Hospital. A split sample comparison was performed. Both samples were walked to a pneumatic tube station, where one sample was sent via tube to the blood gas laboratory, while the other sample was walked back to blood gas laboratory. We examined 2 samples from each of the 27 different pneumatic tube stations in this hospital. Results were graphed with upper and lower control limits set to conform to acceptable College of American Pathologists proficiency testing evaluation criteria. Data were compared using the Student t test.

RESULTS: Differences between walked and tubed specimens were neither clinically nor statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS: Pneumatic tube transport of blood gas specimens is acceptable for blood gas and supplementary analytes, as evidenced by multiple points of evaluation, including statistical analysis, clinical judgment, and concordance with regulatory guidelines.

  • pneumatic tube
  • blood gas
  • quality improvement
  • pulmonary laboratory

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Phillip R Jensen MBA RPFT DLM(ASCP). E-mail: phillip.jensen{at}hsc.utah.edu
  • The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises
View Full Text

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 66 (10)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 66, Issue 10
1 Oct 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of Pneumatic Tube Transport on Blood Gas and Supplemental Analytes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Effects of Pneumatic Tube Transport on Blood Gas and Supplemental Analytes
Phillip R Jensen, Ryan L Aramaki, Steve C Mannebach, Boaz A Markewitz
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (10) 1567-1571; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.07974

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Effects of Pneumatic Tube Transport on Blood Gas and Supplemental Analytes
Phillip R Jensen, Ryan L Aramaki, Steve C Mannebach, Boaz A Markewitz
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (10) 1567-1571; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.07974
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • pneumatic tube
  • blood gas
  • quality improvement
  • pulmonary laboratory

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire