Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Ventilatory Ratio Threshold for Unassisted Breathing: A Retrospective Exploratory Analysis

Athanasia Proklou, Eleftherios Papadakis, Eumorfia Kondili, Nikos Tserlikakis, Vlasios Karageorgos, Ioannis Konstantinou, Eugenia Triantafyllidou, Maria Bolaki, Dimitrios Georgopoulos and Katerina Vaporidi
Respiratory Care November 2021, 66 (11) 1699-1703; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.09208
Athanasia Proklou
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eleftherios Papadakis
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eumorfia Kondili
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikos Tserlikakis
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vlasios Karageorgos
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ioannis Konstantinou
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eugenia Triantafyllidou
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Bolaki
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dimitrios Georgopoulos
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katerina Vaporidi
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School, Greece.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ventilatory ratio (VR) is a simple index of ventilatory efficiency and dead space. Because increased dead space and high ventilatory demands impose a limitation to unassisted ventilation, and may predispose patients to injurious strong efforts during assisted ventilation, evaluation of the VR could provide helpful information during weaning. We hypothesize that there is a threshold of VR associated with tolerance of unassisted breathing.

METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we included subjects ventilated in a control mode for at least 24 h, who were successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation, without use of noninvasive ventilation, and discharged alive from the ICU. We focused on the successful weaning attempts (the last, if more than one was performed) and evaluated the VR at the beginning and at the end of the assisted ventilation period.

RESULTS: We examined 2,000 medical records and included in our analysis 572 subjects (age: 68 y, R5-95 = 25–85, 68% male) with main admission diagnosis of respiratory failure (23%), sepsis (11%), brain injury (34%), and postoperative (14%). The VR at the beginning and the end of the assisted ventilation period was 1.5 (R5-95 = 1–2.1) and 1.4 (R5-95 = 1–2), respectively. The median duration of assisted ventilation in subjects with a VR ≥ 2 at the beginning of the assisted ventilation period was 3 d (R5-95 = 0–14 d), significantly longer than in those with a VR < 2, 0.5 d (R5-95 = 0–8 d, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: Successful liberation from assisted ventilation was associated with a VR < 2. A VR > 2 was associated with longer duration of weaning. The VR could be used as an additional tool to facilitate the decision-making process during weaning.

  • mechanical ventilation
  • dead space
  • assisted ventilation
  • weaning

Introduction

The ventilatory ratio (VR) is a simple index of ventilatory efficiency and dead space, shown to be independently associated with prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and increased ICU and hospital mortality in ARDS patients.1-5 The VR is a unitless variable calculated as the ratio of the observed minute ventilation (V˙E) and arterial carbon dioxide pressure (Embedded Image ) product over the predicted V˙E and Embedded Image product: VR = V˙E (mL) × Embedded Image (mm Hg)/predicted V˙E × 37.5 (mm Hg), using for predicted V˙E the formula predicted V˙E = 100 mL/kg × ideal body weight (kg).1

The VR is affected by dead space (VD) and VD/VT, V˙/Q˙ mismatch, and shunt.6,7 The breathing pattern, tidal volume (VT), and respiratory frequency (f) also affect the VR, as different combinations of VT and f may result in the same V˙E but different VD/VT. Despite the assumptions used in the calculation of predicted V˙E, the VR is an informative and simple-to-obtain index of ventilatory efficiency at the bedside. A high VR indicates increased ventilatory demands. Ventilatory demands are among the 3 factors affecting the patients’ ability to sustain unassisted breathing, along with respiratory system mechanics and muscle strength, and thus affect the weaning process.8 As increased ventilatory demands may impose a limitation to unassisted ventilation, and predispose patients to injurious strong efforts during assisted ventilation,9-11 evaluation of the VR could provide helpful information during weaning.

We hypothesize that there is a threshold of VR associated with tolerance of unassisted breathing. As a first step to explore this hypothesis, we evaluated the range of VR observed during assisted spontaneous breathing in patients successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation.

QUICK LOOK

Current Knowledge

The VR is a simple index of ventilatory efficiency and dead space, shown to be independently associated with adverse outcome in ARDS patients. A high VR indicates increased ventilatory demands and may impose a limitation to spontaneous breathing and predispose patients to injurious strong efforts during assisted patient triggered ventilation, suggesting that evaluation of the VR could provide helpful information during weaning.

What This Paper Contributes to Our Knowledge

In this retrospective study of critically ill subjects from a mixed adult ICU during weaning, successful liberation from patient triggered ventilation was associated with a VR < 2. A VR > 2 was associated with longer duration of weaning and ICU length of stay.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the last 2,000 medical records of critically ill patients admitted at the University Hospital of Heraklion ICU (4-y period) was performed, approved by the local ethics committee. In the analysis, we included subjects ventilated in a control mode for at least 24 h, who were successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation, without use of noninvasive ventilation, and discharged alive from the ICU. We excluded patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, and shorter than 152, due to a limitation of the ideal body weight equation. During the analyzed period, subjects were ventilated on either pressure support or proportional assist ventilation (PAV+) mode, and weaning was performed using our previously described weaning protocol12 with minor modifications. Arterial blood gas analysis was routinely performed 6 times daily and after any change in mode of ventilation. We evaluated the VR using the Embedded Image and V˙E of the arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis obtained at the beginning and the end of the weaning period as shown in Figure 1 at the beginning (last ABG in control mode) and the end (last ABG in assisted mode) of assisted ventilation and the first only in CPAP among unassisted modes (because V˙E is not measured in T-piece or after extubation). We focused on the successful weaning attempts, and only the last prior to ICU discharge, if more than one was performed in a subject. The time period between the beginning and the end of ventilation in assisted mode is reported as duration of weaning (in d). Subjects placed on CPAP or T-piece directly from control mode were considered to have 0 d of weaning, and because not all subjects were placed on assisted ventilation or CPAP prior to extubation or T-piece, the number of observations in the end of assisted and CPAP mode is smaller than those of the last in control mode. We computed the VR as previously described,1 using subjects’ height measured on admission to estimate the ideal body weight. We also calculated the ideal body weight corrected for the age-related height loss,13 because in our ICU height is measured on admission, and computed a corrected VR. VR and corrected VR were calculated according to the equations: Embedded Image Embedded Image Embedded Image Embedded Image Embedded Image Embedded Image Embedded Image

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Time points of ventilatory ratio calculation.

We analyzed 2 subgroups of subjects, those ventilated through an endotracheal tube rather than a tracheostomy, to evaluate the effect of dead-space reduction of tracheostomy on VR, and subjects with acute respiratory failure. In this group, we included subjects admitted in the ICU for acute respiratory failure and subjects having a Embedded Image /Embedded Image < 200 mm Hg at the beginning of weaning. We also evaluated the effect of mode of assist (pressure support or PAV+) on VR and outcome.

Statistical analysis: The distribution of values was evaluated for normality with Shapiro-Wilk test, and for all parameters the median and R5-95 percentile range are reported. Comparison between groups is performed with Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data.

Results

From the 2,000 medical records analyzed, we excluded 222 cases of non-critically ill patients admitted for invasive procedures, 708 patients who were either not intubated or ventilated in control mode < 24 h, 369 patients who died in the ICU, 98 patients who were extubated to noninvasive ventilation or discharged on invasive ventilation from the ICU, and 41 patients shorter than 152 cm; hence, 572 subjects were included in the analysis. The median age was 68 y, (R5-95 = 25–85), 68% were male, with main admission diagnoses of respiratory failure (23%), sepsis (11%), brain injury (34%), and postoperative (14%). The median ICU length of stay was 12 d (R5-95 = 4–34), and the duration of mechanical ventilation 8 d (R5-95 = 2–27).

The VR and corrected VR at the beginning and the end of the assisted ventilation period for all subjects are presented in Figure 2A. The upper range of VR values associated with successful liberation from assisted ventilation was 2. As shown in Figure 2B, no significant difference in the distribution or threshold of corrected VR was observed in the subgroups of patients with endotracheal tube or respiratory failure.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

A. Ventilatory ratio (VR) and corrected VR for age-related height loss at the beginning and the end of the assisted ventilation period in all subjects; and B. Corrected VR at the beginning and the end of the assisted ventilation period in subjects ventilated through an endotracheal tube and subjects with respiratory failure. The number of observations at each time point was for all subjects 572, 383, 303 for beginning and end of assisted and CPAP, respectively; for subjects with endotracheal tube, 325, 182, 156; and for subjects with respiratory failure, 198, 158, 96, respectively. Boxes represent interquartile range, whiskers the R5-95 range; dots represent outliers, and line is at median.

The median duration of assisted ventilation in subjects with a VR ≥ 2 at the beginning of the assisted ventilation period was much greater than in those with a VR < 2, Figure 3. Similarly, the total duration of mechanical ventilation and the duration of ICU length of stay correlated positively with the VR at the beginning of the assisted ventilation period (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.28 for the duration of mechanical ventilation and 0.24 for ICU length of stay), and it was greater in subjects with a VR ≥ 2 than in those with a VR < 2 (14 vs 8 d and 19 vs 11 d, respectively, P < .001 for both).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

The duration of assisted ventilation is shorter when subjects’ VR at the beginning of weaning is < 2 (median 0.5 d) than when VR ≥ 2 (median 3.0 d), P < .001 by Mann Whitney U test.

We finally examined the change of VR during the course of weaning. The change of VR during weaning (from beginning to end) varied significantly among subjects (median 0.1, R5-95 = −0.3 to −0 .6), showing improvement in 60% of the subjects. As shown in Figure 4, VR changes varied when the VR at the beginning of weaning was low but always improved when VR was initially > 1.8. There was no difference in the change of VR between patients ventilated with pressure support or PAV+.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Change of VR from the beginning to the end of weaning relative to its initial value. A positive change indicates improvement (decrease) of VR during weaning.

Discussion

In this retrospective analysis, we observed that the VR was always < 2 when subjects were able to maintain unassisted breathing. A high VR at the beginning of weaning was associated with prolonged duration of assisted ventilation and ICU stay.

The VR is a simple index of ventilatory efficiency, as Embedded Image /Embedded Image is an index of oxygenation. Although the VR has many oversimplifications, similarly to Embedded Image /Embedded Image its simplicity makes it appealing for use in everyday practice to monitor and stratify ventilatory efficiency and risk of weaning failure.

The results of this study show that a high VR > 2 is not observed when physicians extubate patients or place them on CPAP or T-piece. A previous study has shown that a high VR on admission was associated with prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation.2 In line with this observation, the results of the present study showed that when the VR was high at the beginning of assisted ventilation a longer duration of assisted ventilation was observed, and subjects were finally liberated from ventilatory assistance only when their VR fell < 2. Clearly, a low VR cannot ensure liberation from mechanical ventilation or successful extubation because it merely indicates ventilatory efficiency and not the adequacy of respiratory muscles to compensate for the present load imposed by abnormalities of the respiratory system mechanics. Yet, a high VR is not compatible with liberation from assisted ventilation but associated with prolonged need for mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay.

This study has the limitations associated with a retrospective, single-center study. Our findings are likely affected by the weaning protocol used, which, nonetheless, is similar to common practice. The case mix studied also may have affected the results, but the subgroup analysis did not show differences among specific groups of subjects, such as those with respiratory failure. Due to the retrospective nature of the analysis, the impact of VR on the decision making process during weaning could not be evaluated, and the incidence of weaning failure due to increased ventilatory demands and high VR could not be examined.

The VR threshold 2 for unassisted breathing identified in this study could be confirmed in other, larger databases and studied as a tool to facilitate the decision making process during weaning.14,15 For example, initiation of weaning is usually suggested based on improvement of oxygenation and hemodynamic stability. Yet, a VR in control mode much > 2 indicates patients’ ventilatory demands are high; thus, there is a risk for injurious strong inspiratory efforts during assisted ventilation, and closer monitoring of effort or delayed weaning could be considered.9,11,14,15 Therefore, the VR could be incorporated in weaning protocols to complement indices of oxygenation in the identification of readiness to wean. Similarly, the VR could be used to identify patients with increased ventilatory demands at extubation (a VR close to 2) who could be candidates for preventive interventions to avoid extubation failure.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the VR is a useful index to monitor patients’ ventilatory efficiency during the weaning process. A high VR is associated with prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation, and a VR < 2 appears to be necessary for unassisted breathing. Therefore, a VR threshold 2 could be used to characterize patients’ ventilatory efficiency for unassisted ventilation and complement the indices of oxygenation in the decision making process during weaning.

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Katerina Vaporidi MD PhD, University of Crete School of Medicine, Voutes Campus, Office 8A4, 70013, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. E-mail: vaporidi{at}uoc.gr
  • The study was performed at the intensive care unit of the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

  • Drs Georgopoulos, Kondili, and Vaporidi disclose relationships with Medtronic. The other authors have no conflicts to disclose.

  • Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Sinha P,
    2. Fauvel NJ,
    3. Singh S,
    4. Soni N
    . Ventilatory ratio: a simple bedside measure of ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2009;102(5):692-697.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sinha P,
    2. Calfee CS,
    3. Beitler JR,
    4. Soni N,
    5. Ho K,
    6. Matthay MA,
    7. et al
    . Physiologic analysis and clinical performance of the ventilatory ratio in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;199(3):333-341.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.
    1. Sinha P,
    2. Fauvel NJ,
    3. Singh P,
    4. Soni N
    . Analysis of ventilatory ratio as a novel method to monitor ventilatory adequacy at the bedside. Crit Care 2013;17(1):R34.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Morales-Quinteros L,
    2. Schultz MJ,
    3. Bringué J,
    4. Calfee CS,
    5. Camprubí M,
    6. Cremer OL,
    7. et al
    ; MARS Consortium. Estimated dead space fraction and the ventilatory ratio are associated with mortality in early ARDS. Ann Intensive Care 2019;9(1):128.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    1. Raurich JM,
    2. Vilar M,
    3. Colomar A,
    4. Ibáñez J,
    5. Ayestarán I,
    6. Pérez-Bárcena J,
    7. et al
    . Prognostic value of the pulmonary dead-space fraction during the early and intermediate phases of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Care 2010;55(3):282-287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tang Y,
    2. Turner MJ,
    3. Baker AB
    . A new equal-area method to calculate and represent physiologic, anatomical, and alveolar dead spaces. Anesthesiology 2006;104(4):696-700.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tang Y,
    2. Turner MJ,
    3. Baker AB
    . Effects of alveolar dead space, shunt, and V/Q distribution on respiratory dead-space measurements. Br J Anaesth 2005;95(4):538-548.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Boles J-M,
    2. Bion J,
    3. Connors A,
    4. Herridge M,
    5. Marsh B,
    6. Melot C,
    7. et al
    . Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 2007;29(5):1033-1056.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Goligher EC,
    2. Jonkman AH,
    3. Dianti J,
    4. Vaporidi K,
    5. Beitler JR,
    6. Patel BK,
    7. et al
    . Clinical strategies for implementing lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation: avoiding insufficient and excessive effort. Intensive Care Med 2020;46(12):2314-2326.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.
    1. Vaporidi K,
    2. Akoumianaki E,
    3. Telias I,
    4. Goligher EC,
    5. Brochard L,
    6. Georgopoulos D
    . Respiratory drive in critically ill patients. Pathophysiology and clinical implications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020;201(1):20-32.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Williams EC,
    2. Motta-Ribeiro GC,
    3. Vidal Melo MF
    . Driving pressure and transpulmonary pressure: how do we guide safe mechanical ventilation? Anesthesiology 2019;131(1):155-163.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Xirouchaki N,
    2. Kondili E,
    3. Vaporidi K,
    4. Xirouchakis G,
    5. Klimathianaki M,
    6. Gavriilidis G,
    7. et al
    . Proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors in critically ill patients: comparison with pressure support. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(11):2026-2034.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Sorkin JD,
    2. Muller DC,
    3. Andres R
    . Longitudinal change in height of men and women: implications for interpretation of the body mass index: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150(9):969-977.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Haaksma ME,
    2. Tuinman PR,
    3. Heunks L
    . Weaning the patient: between protocols and physiology. Curr Opin Crit Care 2021;27(1):29-36.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Haas CF,
    2. Loik PS
    . Ventilator discontinuation protocols. Respir Care 2012;57(10):1649-1662.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 66 (11)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 66, Issue 11
1 Nov 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ventilatory Ratio Threshold for Unassisted Breathing: A Retrospective Exploratory Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ventilatory Ratio Threshold for Unassisted Breathing: A Retrospective Exploratory Analysis
Athanasia Proklou, Eleftherios Papadakis, Eumorfia Kondili, Nikos Tserlikakis, Vlasios Karageorgos, Ioannis Konstantinou, Eugenia Triantafyllidou, Maria Bolaki, Dimitrios Georgopoulos, Katerina Vaporidi
Respiratory Care Nov 2021, 66 (11) 1699-1703; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09208

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Ventilatory Ratio Threshold for Unassisted Breathing: A Retrospective Exploratory Analysis
Athanasia Proklou, Eleftherios Papadakis, Eumorfia Kondili, Nikos Tserlikakis, Vlasios Karageorgos, Ioannis Konstantinou, Eugenia Triantafyllidou, Maria Bolaki, Dimitrios Georgopoulos, Katerina Vaporidi
Respiratory Care Nov 2021, 66 (11) 1699-1703; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09208
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • mechanical ventilation
  • dead space
  • assisted ventilation
  • weaning

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire