Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Open Forum
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Open Forum
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Comparing the Effects of Tidal Volume, Driving Pressure, and Mechanical Power on Mortality in Trials of Lung-Protective Mechanical Ventilation

Jose Dianti, John Matelski, Manuel Tisminetzky, Allan J Walkey, Laveena Munshi, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Eddy Fan, Eduardo LV Costa, Carol L Hodgson, Laurent Brochard and Ewan C Goligher
Respiratory Care February 2021, 66 (2) 221-227; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07876
Jose Dianti
Interdepartmenal Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Matelski
Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Tisminetzky
Interdepartmenal Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allan J Walkey
Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laveena Munshi
Interdepartmenal Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorenzo Del Sorbo
Interdepartmenal Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eddy Fan
Interdepartmenal Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eduardo LV Costa
Research and Education Institute, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol L Hodgson
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care-Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurent Brochard
Interdepartmenal Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Keenan Research Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ewan C Goligher
Interdepartmenal Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The unifying goal of lung-protective ventilation strategies in ARDS is to minimize the strain and stress applied by mechanical ventilation to the lung to reduce ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The relative contributions of the magnitude and frequency of mechanical stress and the end-expiratory pressure to the development of VILI is unknown. Consequently, it is uncertain whether the risk of VILI is best quantified in terms of tidal volume (VT), driving pressure (ΔP), or mechanical power.

METHODS: The correlation between differences in VT, ΔP, and mechanical power and the magnitude of mortality benefit in trials of lung-protective ventilation strategies in adult subjects with ARDS was assessed by meta-regression. Modified mechanical power was computed including PEEP (Powerelastic), excluding PEEP (Powerdynamic), and using ΔP (Powerdriving). The primary analysis incorporated all included trials. A secondary subgroup analysis was restricted to trials of lower versus higher PEEP strategies.

RESULTS: We included 9 trials involving 4,731 subjects in the analysis. Odds ratios for moderation derived from meta-regression showed that variations in VT, ΔP, and Powerdynamic were associated with increased mortality with odds ratios of 1.24 (95% CI 1.03–1.49), 1.31 (95% CI 1.03–1.66), and 1.37 (95% CI 1.05–1.78), respectively. In trials comparing higher versus lower PEEP strategies, Powerelastic was increased in the higher PEEP arm (24 ± 1.7 vs 20 ± 1.5 J/min, respectively), whereas the other parameters were not affected on average by a higher PEEP ventilation strategy.

CONCLUSIONS: In trials of lung-protective ventilation strategies, VT, ΔP, Powerelastic, Powerdynamic, and Powerdriving exhibited similar moderation of treatment effect on mortality. In this study, modified mechanical power did not add important information on the risk of death from VILI in comparison to VT or ΔP.

  • ARDS
  • VILI
  • mechanical ventilation
  • mechanical power
  • lung-protective strategies
  • meta-regression

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Ewan C Goligher MD PhD, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 11-PMB Room 192, Toronto ON M5G 2N2, Canada. E-mail: ewan.goligher{at}uhn.ca
  • Dr Goligher has disclosed relationships with Getinge and Timpel. Dr Fan has disclosed relationships with ALung Technologies and MC3 Cardiopulmonary. Dr Brochard has disclosed relationships with Medtronic|Covidien, Air Liquide, Philips, Sentec, General Electric, and Fisher & Paykel. The other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises
View Full Text

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 66 (2)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 66, Issue 2
1 Feb 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing the Effects of Tidal Volume, Driving Pressure, and Mechanical Power on Mortality in Trials of Lung-Protective Mechanical Ventilation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparing the Effects of Tidal Volume, Driving Pressure, and Mechanical Power on Mortality in Trials of Lung-Protective Mechanical Ventilation
Jose Dianti, John Matelski, Manuel Tisminetzky, Allan J Walkey, Laveena Munshi, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Eddy Fan, Eduardo LV Costa, Carol L Hodgson, Laurent Brochard, Ewan C Goligher
Respiratory Care Feb 2021, 66 (2) 221-227; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.07876

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparing the Effects of Tidal Volume, Driving Pressure, and Mechanical Power on Mortality in Trials of Lung-Protective Mechanical Ventilation
Jose Dianti, John Matelski, Manuel Tisminetzky, Allan J Walkey, Laveena Munshi, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Eddy Fan, Eduardo LV Costa, Carol L Hodgson, Laurent Brochard, Ewan C Goligher
Respiratory Care Feb 2021, 66 (2) 221-227; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.07876
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • ARDS
  • VILI
  • mechanical ventilation
  • Mechanical Power
  • lung-protective strategies
  • meta-regression

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire