Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Open Forum
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Open Forum
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Closed-Loop Oxygen Control Using a Novel Nasal High-Flow Device: A Randomized Crossover Trial

James CP Harper, Nethmi A Kearns, Ingrid Maijers, Grace E Bird, Irene Braithwaite, Nicholas P Shortt, Allie Eathorne, Mark Weatherall and Richard Beasley
Respiratory Care March 2021, 66 (3) 416-424; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.08087
James CP Harper
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected].nz
Nethmi A Kearns
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ingrid Maijers
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grace E Bird
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irene Braithwaite
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas P Shortt
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allie Eathorne
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Weatherall
University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Beasley
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Capital & Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oxygen administration is recommended for patients with hypoxemia to achieve a target Embedded Image range. Strategies to achieve this in clinical practice are suboptimal. We investigated automatic oxygen titration using a novel nasal high-flow device with closed-loop oxygen control. The objective of this proof-of-concept study was to determine whether closed-loop control was able to respond to desaturation and subsequent recovery in a controlled laboratory-based environment.

METHODS: We conducted a single-blind randomized crossover trial in adults with chronic respiratory disease who had a resting Embedded Image ≥ 92% and desaturated to < 90% during a 6-min walk test (6MWT). Nasal high-flow was administered during a 6MWT and a subsequent 10-min rest period with either room air, a fixed concentration of 28% oxygen, or oxygen titrated automatically using closed-loop control.

RESULTS: The study involved 42 subjects. Closed-loop control maintained Embedded Image within the target range of 92–96% for a mean (SD) duration of 54.4 ± 30.1% of the 6MWT and 67.3 ± 26.8% of the recovery period. The proportion of time spent with an Embedded Image in the target range during the 6MWT was significantly greater for closed-loop control compared to room air, with a difference of 26.0% (95% CI 17.7–34.2, P < .001); this proportion of time was not significantly different compared to the fixed concentration of 28% oxygen, with a difference of –8.2% (95% CI –16.5 to 0.1, P = .052). The proportion of time spent in the target range during the rest period was significantly greater compared to 28% oxygen, with a difference of 19.3% (95% CI 8.9–29.7, P < .001); this proportion of time was not significantly different compared to room air, with a difference of –9.3% (95% CI –19.7 to 1.0, P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS: This study provides proof-of-concept evidence that the novel nasal high-flow device with closed-loop control can respond to changes in Embedded Image outside a target saturation range using a model of exercise-induced desaturation and subsequent recovery.

  • nasal high-flow
  • oxygen
  • closed-loop
  • automatic titration

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: James CP Harper MBChB MRCP. Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Private Bag 7902, Newtown, Wellington 6242, New Zealand. E-mail: james.harper{at}mrinz.ac.nz
  • This work was supported by Fisher and Paykel Healthcare and the MRINZ receives funding from the Health Research Council of New Zealand as an Independent Research Organisation grant. The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • Supplementary material related to this paper is available at http://www.rcjournal.com.

  • Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises
View Full Text

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 66 (3)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 66, Issue 3
1 Mar 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Closed-Loop Oxygen Control Using a Novel Nasal High-Flow Device: A Randomized Crossover Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Closed-Loop Oxygen Control Using a Novel Nasal High-Flow Device: A Randomized Crossover Trial
James CP Harper, Nethmi A Kearns, Ingrid Maijers, Grace E Bird, Irene Braithwaite, Nicholas P Shortt, Allie Eathorne, Mark Weatherall, Richard Beasley
Respiratory Care Mar 2021, 66 (3) 416-424; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.08087

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Closed-Loop Oxygen Control Using a Novel Nasal High-Flow Device: A Randomized Crossover Trial
James CP Harper, Nethmi A Kearns, Ingrid Maijers, Grace E Bird, Irene Braithwaite, Nicholas P Shortt, Allie Eathorne, Mark Weatherall, Richard Beasley
Respiratory Care Mar 2021, 66 (3) 416-424; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.08087
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • nasal high-flow
  • oxygen
  • closed-loop
  • automatic titration

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire