Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Meeting ReportEducation

Evaluation of the Transition to Online Learning in Mechanical Ventilation During the COVID Pandemic

Robert Brent Murray and Rachel Culbreth
Respiratory Care October 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3592676;
Robert Brent Murray
Respiratory Therapy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Culbreth
Respiratory Therapy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: Traditional education models for respiratory therapy (RT) programs require in-class attendance and laboratory experience. The COVID pandemic interrupted this model requiring RT programs to transition to virtual learning. The purpose of this study was to compare the 2020 mechanical ventilation I course test scores and overall final course grade to determine if modification to virtual instruction impacted mean scores compared to previous years of in-person instruction.

Methods: Data included two exam scores and final course grade for four years, from 2017-2020. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA were used. Data from 2017-2019 was collected in a traditional course meeting in-person 200 min per week for seven weeks and seven laboratory meetings. Data from 2020 course utilized a virtual course design that included pre-recorded lectures on the same material as 2017-2019, including the same textbook and three in-person laboratory meetings. Online interaction via WebEx for 120 min was presented for students to identify material in which they did not understand. Additionally, students could converse via other communication sources outside of class as in previous years to discuss issues.

Results: The 2020 data group had the highest mean grade for exam one, exam two, and final grade at 88.92, 83.11, 87.59 respectively. Of the four groups, 2020 had the lowest number of students (N = 37). One-way ANOVA showed no statistical differences between the four years for exam one (P = .594), exam two (P = .626), or final course grade (P = .35).

Conclusions: Transitioning to virtual instruction for mechanical ventilation did produce higher mean averages for exam one, exam two, and final grade for the 2020 subject group compared to previous years, but this difference was not statistically significant. This could have been influenced for reasons other than the virtual classroom model. Students had opportunities to review lecture material multiple times and online/email access to the professor. Therefore, the COVID pandemic had no significant impact on RT student’s achievement in mechanical ventilation.

Footnotes

  • Commercial Relationships: None

  • Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care
Vol. 66, Issue Suppl 10
1 Oct 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

 

Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of the Transition to Online Learning in Mechanical Ventilation During the COVID Pandemic
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of the Transition to Online Learning in Mechanical Ventilation During the COVID Pandemic
Robert Brent Murray, Rachel Culbreth
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3592676;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Evaluation of the Transition to Online Learning in Mechanical Ventilation During the COVID Pandemic
Robert Brent Murray, Rachel Culbreth
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3592676;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire