Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Meeting ReportMechanical Ventilation and Tracheostomy

Evaluation of an Auxiliary Volume Display for Multiplex Ventilation: A Simulation Study

Morgan Elise Sorg and Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory Care October 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3597410;
Morgan Elise Sorg
Respiratory, Cleveland Clinic, Sagamore Hills, Ohio, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory, Cleveland Clinic, Sagamore Hills, Ohio, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: Studies have investigated multiplex ventilation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our previous study indicated failure of a multiplex circuit to ventilate patients with different lung mechanics in 67% of simulations (PMID: 32345741). Of the four safety problems that must be solved to safely ventilate two patients with one ventilator, individual tidal volume monitoring may be the most important. IngMar Medical designed a prototype auxiliary volume display (AVD-19) to display tidal volume delivery to two patients during multiplex ventilation. The AVD-19 is not currently approved for patient use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the AVD-19.

Methods: Two IngMar ASL 5000 breathing simulators were set to represent identical patients (same resistance and compliance). The mode of ventilation was pressure control continuous mandatory ventilation with set-point targeting (PC-CMVs) as in our previous study. The volume delivery was changed to each simulator with an adjustable flow diverter valve. As the volume distribution between patients was changed, the tidal volume to each lung simulator was recorded by the simulators and compared to the volumes displayed on the AVD-19. The volumes displayed on the AVD-19 were manually corrected to body temperature and pressure saturated conditions (BTPS).

Results: The volume reading from the AVD-19 underestimates actual volume delivery with average error of -17%. However, ISO standard 80601-2-12 says that the accuracy of the delivered volume monitoring equipment shall be within ± 4.0 mL +15% for the actual delivered volume. Therefore, the accuracy range of the AVD-19 (-15 to -24%) was reasonable.

Conclusions: This simulation-based study shows that the AVD-19 can display individual tidal volumes during multiplex ventilation, but for best accuracy would require an adjustment to correct for the error: VT dosage = desired (mL/kg) x ideal body weight x 0.83.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Footnotes

  • Commercial Relationships: Robert Chatburn is consultant for: IngMar Medical Vyaire Medical Promedic LLC

  • Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care
Vol. 66, Issue Suppl 10
1 Oct 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

 

Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of an Auxiliary Volume Display for Multiplex Ventilation: A Simulation Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of an Auxiliary Volume Display for Multiplex Ventilation: A Simulation Study
Morgan Elise Sorg, Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3597410;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Evaluation of an Auxiliary Volume Display for Multiplex Ventilation: A Simulation Study
Morgan Elise Sorg, Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3597410;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire