Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Meeting ReportAerosol and Oxygen Therapy

Performance of Open Oxygen Mask Design versus Conventional Oxygen Delivery Devices: A Simulation Study

Morgan Elise Sorg and Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory Care October 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3602821;
Morgan Elise Sorg
Respiratory, Cleveland Clinic, Sagamore Hills, Ohio, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory, Cleveland Clinic, Sagamore Hills, Ohio, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: Vyaire Medical has recently created an open-faced oxygen mask, Vyaire Open (VO) that is designed to direct flow towards the nares and mouth via multiple jet orifices. The manufacturer claims that this device is superior in tracheal FIO2 delivery across a range of flow. This suggests that it eliminates the need for usage of multiple oxygen delivery devices as a patient’s FIO2requirements change. The VO specifies flow (1–15 L/min and flush) and expected FIO2 from 0.25-0.85. The purpose of this study was to compare FIO2 performance between the VO and standard oxygen masks.

Methods: The following oxygen masks were compared to VO: A simple mask (Vyaire), OxyMask (open design from Southmedic), partial rebreather (Vyaire), and non-rebreather (Vyaire). An adult mannequin head (Michigan Instruments) was attached to a breathing simulator (IngMar ASL 5000) which recorded FIO2. Each mask was sealed to the mannequin head to prevent leaks. The simulator was set to closed-loop volume control mode with VT = 320 mL, C = 50 mL/cm H2O, R = 4 cm H2O/L/s, f = 15, increase = 25%, hold = 0%, release = 30%. Each oxygen mask was run at the recommended flows: simple mask 5–10 L/min, OxyMask 1–15 L/min, flush, partial rebreather and non-rebreather mask 10–15 L/min, flush. Each flow was verified with a Citrex H4 flow analyzer (imt Medical) prior to attaching the mask for FIO2 measurement. Each experiment was repeated once.

Results: For VO: at low flows (1–6 L/min) the measured FIO2 was higher than that specified by the manufacture, at flows 7–10 L/min the measured FIO2 was within the specified range, and at flows >10 L/min the FIO2 was below the specified range (see graph). The results for FIO2 across all devices are shown in the table.

Conclusions: In this simulation study we found the measured FIO2 for VO varied from the manufacture’s specifications in the package insert. As expected, performance varied greatly among devices. The FIO2 was generally higher for the VO than the OxyMask. The simple mask outperformed both VO and OxyMask. Finally, both the partial and non-rebreather outperformed all the other devices. This study reinforces the notion that oxygen delivery cannot be reliably predicted and must be titrated using blood saturation measurements.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Footnotes

  • Commercial Relationships: IngMar Medical Vyaire Medical Promedic LLC

  • Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care
Vol. 66, Issue Suppl 10
1 Oct 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

 

Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Performance of Open Oxygen Mask Design versus Conventional Oxygen Delivery Devices: A Simulation Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Performance of Open Oxygen Mask Design versus Conventional Oxygen Delivery Devices: A Simulation Study
Morgan Elise Sorg, Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3602821;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Performance of Open Oxygen Mask Design versus Conventional Oxygen Delivery Devices: A Simulation Study
Morgan Elise Sorg, Robert L Chatburn
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3602821;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire