Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Meeting ReportPulmonary Disease

Evaluation of Remote Patient Monitoring App for Spirometry Patients

Sarah Miller, Ben Schooley, Neset Hikmet, Preshant Duhoon, Charlie Strange, Jay Dixon and Amanda K Clark
Respiratory Care October 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3604823;
Sarah Miller
College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ben Schooley
College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neset Hikmet
College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Preshant Duhoon
College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlie Strange
Department of Medicine,, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay Dixon
PulManage, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda K Clark
PulManage, Columbia, South Carolina, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: COPD is associated with substantial functional morbidity including activity-limiting symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue. Self-management interventions aid in symptomatic management of COPD and have been shown to produce positive outcomes on quality of life (QOL) and hospital admissions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of our team’s innovative, technology-enhanced COPD self-management application (PulManage) that integrates real-time spirometry, symptom tracking, and bidirectional provider communication within one platform.

Methods: A total of 20 participants were recruited for this mixed methods feasibility trial. Participants received remote spirometry devices and downloaded PulManage software on their phones. Participants tracked symptoms, temperature, and respiratory rate, and completed a minimum of two spirometry sessions (defined as three efforts) daily for 2 weeks. A total of 18 participants (90%) completed the 2-week trial. Acceptability was evaluated with the Technology Acceptance Model. Following the trial, system usability was evaluated with multiple choice questions and qualitative interviews explored perceptions of usability, acceptability, and satisfaction amongst participants.

Results: Of the 11 participants who responded to feedback surveys, 100% indicated that they had the necessary knowledge and resources to use the PulManage system. 81.8% found the system useful and 90.9% indicated that it was easy to use. When evaluating overall reaction to the system construct (usefulness, ease of use, attitude toward system, intent to use), a total of 90.9% of the respondents had a positive attitude towards the system. Feedback included the desire for personalized feedback of spirometry performance and educational tools.

Conclusions: The remote patient monitoring app with integrated spirometry is feasible and acceptable. Continuing efforts are focused on developing personalized feedback mechanisms and educational modules.

Footnotes

  • Commercial Relationships: AC, BS, and NH are employees of PulManage. PD is a consultant to PulManage. CS has grants to MUSC from Adverum, Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, CSA Medical, CSL Behring, Grifols, MatRx, Nuvaira, Pulmonx, Takeda, and Vertex. He is a consultant for AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, PulManage, Uptake Medical, UpToDate, Takeda, and Vertex. SM has no disclosures.

  • Support: Funding was provided by South Carolina Research Authority and PulManage for the conduct of this study.

  • Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care
Vol. 66, Issue Suppl 10
1 Oct 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

 

Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Remote Patient Monitoring App for Spirometry Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Remote Patient Monitoring App for Spirometry Patients
Sarah Miller, Ben Schooley, Neset Hikmet, Preshant Duhoon, Charlie Strange, Jay Dixon, Amanda K Clark
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3604823;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Evaluation of Remote Patient Monitoring App for Spirometry Patients
Sarah Miller, Ben Schooley, Neset Hikmet, Preshant Duhoon, Charlie Strange, Jay Dixon, Amanda K Clark
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3604823;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire