Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Call for Abstracts
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Meeting ReportMechanical Ventilation and Tracheostomy

Comparisons of Mathematical Model Tools in Assessing Respiratory Illness in the ICU

Taha Ismaeil, Fatmah Mahmoud Othman, Saleh Alqarni, Abdullah Mayof AlAnazi, Tareq Alotabi, Khalid Alosaimi, Khalid Alzahrani, Yousef Alhudaithi, Yousef Alkhalil, Mohammed Alotaibi and Abdullah binjerais
Respiratory Care October 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3607975;
Taha Ismaeil
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fatmah Mahmoud Othman
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saleh Alqarni
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdullah Mayof AlAnazi
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tareq Alotabi
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Khalid Alosaimi
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Khalid Alzahrani
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yousef Alhudaithi
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yousef Alkhalil
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed Alotaibi
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdullah binjerais
Respiratory Therapy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

Background: In the intensive care unit, therapists utilize various tools to assess and monitor respiratory illness; those tools are mathematical models such as the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction, arterial/alveolar oxygen tension ratio, alveolar-arterial oxygen tension difference, respiratory index, oxygen index and oxygen saturation index. However, evidence reported that some pulmonary physiological factors were not integrated into the calculation of those models. Therefore, this research aimed to demonstrate the variation in those models within a short period within critical care settings.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in ICU at tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia between 2017–2019. Adult patients who have been admitted to the ICU and placed on the mechanical ventilation > 24 h were included. From the medical file of each patient, data on the mechanical ventilator setting and ABG results were extracted. Then, two different arterial blood gas samples were selected within a mean of 120 min based on patient-specific needs for one day. Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. The coefficient of variation percent [(CV%) = SD/mean] was calculated and Institutional Review Board approval was obtained (IRB:SP20089R).

Results: A total of 211 intubated ICU patients were included in this study. The mean (SD) age of the study population was 57 (19.62), and 33% were female. The average CV% for all mathematical models report a degree of variation between (14%–30%). The mean CV% for PaO2/FIO2 and PaO2/ PaO2 was 14% which consider a low variation compared to the RI in which the mean CV% was 30%.

Conclusions: the finding of this study indicates the need to adopt a new model that integrate pulmonary physiological factors mathematically to represent a real lung condition. This will help alongside with the other oxygen indices in assessing the severity of respiratory illness.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Footnotes

  • Commercial Relationships: None

  • Copyright © 2021 by Daedalus Enterprises
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care
Vol. 66, Issue Suppl 10
1 Oct 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

 

Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparisons of Mathematical Model Tools in Assessing Respiratory Illness in the ICU
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparisons of Mathematical Model Tools in Assessing Respiratory Illness in the ICU
Taha Ismaeil, Fatmah Mahmoud Othman, Saleh Alqarni, Abdullah Mayof AlAnazi, Tareq Alotabi, Khalid Alosaimi, Khalid Alzahrani, Yousef Alhudaithi, Yousef Alkhalil, Mohammed Alotaibi, Abdullah binjerais
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3607975;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Comparisons of Mathematical Model Tools in Assessing Respiratory Illness in the ICU
Taha Ismaeil, Fatmah Mahmoud Othman, Saleh Alqarni, Abdullah Mayof AlAnazi, Tareq Alotabi, Khalid Alosaimi, Khalid Alzahrani, Yousef Alhudaithi, Yousef Alkhalil, Mohammed Alotaibi, Abdullah binjerais
Respiratory Care Oct 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3607975;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire