Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Pediatric Simulation of Intrinsic PEEP and Patient-Ventilator Trigger Asynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation

Amanda J Nickel, Howard B Panitch, Joseph M McDonough, Etze Chotzoglou and Julian L Allen
Respiratory Care November 2022, 67 (11) 1405-1412; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.09484
Amanda J Nickel
Department of Respiratory Care, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Howard B Panitch
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph M McDonough
Department of Respiratory Care, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Etze Chotzoglou
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julian L Allen
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrinsic PEEP during mechanical ventilation occurs when there is insufficient time for expiration to functional residual capacity before the next inspiration, resulting in air trapping. Increased expiratory resistance (RE), too rapid of a patient or ventilator breathing rate, or a longer inspiratory to expiratory time ratio (TI/TE) can all be causes of intrinsic PEEP. Intrinsic PEEP can result in increased work of breathing and patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) during patient-triggered breaths. We hypothesized that the difference between intrinsic PEEP and ventilator PEEP acts as an inspiratory load resulting in trigger asynchrony that needs to be overcome by increased respiratory muscle pressure (Pmus).

METHODS: Using a Servo lung model (ASL 5000) and LTV 1200 ventilator in pressure control mode, we developed a passive model demonstrating how elevated RE increases intrinsic PEEP above ventilator PEEP. We also developed an active model investigating the effects of RE and intrinsic PEEP on trigger asynchrony (expressed as percentage of patient-initiated breaths that failed to trigger). We then studied if trigger asynchrony could be reduced by increased Pmus.

RESULTS: Intrinsic PEEP increased significantly with increasing RE (r = 0.97, P = .006). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both RE and negative Pmus levels affect trigger asynchrony (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: A passive lung model describes the development of increasing intrinsic PEEP with increasing RE at a given ventilator breathing rate. An active lung model shows how this can lead to trigger asynchrony since the Pmus needed to trigger a breath is greater with increased RE, as the inspiratory muscles must overcome intrinsic PEEP. This model will lend itself to the study of intrinsic PEEP engendered by a higher ventilator breathing rate, as well as higher TI/TE, and will be useful in ventilator simulation scenarios of PVA. The model also suggests that increasing ventilator PEEP to match intrinsic PEEP can improve trigger asynchrony through a reduction in RE.

  • auto-PEEP
  • bench study
  • critical care
  • exhalation
  • intrinsic PEEP
  • mechanical ventilation
  • pediatrics
  • respiratory mechanics report

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Amanda J Nickel MSc RRT RRT-NPS RRT-ACCS, Department of Respiratory Care, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, 7NW149, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: nickelaj{at}chop.edu
  • Ms Nickel discloses a relationship with Nihon Kohden. The remaining authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • A version of this article was presented by Ms Nickel at ATS 2020, held virtually August 5–10, 2020.

  • This study was funded through the Clare Foundation and Morse Foundation.

  • Copyright © 2022 by Daedalus Enterprises
View Full Text

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 67 (11)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 67, Issue 11
1 Nov 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pediatric Simulation of Intrinsic PEEP and Patient-Ventilator Trigger Asynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Pediatric Simulation of Intrinsic PEEP and Patient-Ventilator Trigger Asynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation
Amanda J Nickel, Howard B Panitch, Joseph M McDonough, Etze Chotzoglou, Julian L Allen
Respiratory Care Nov 2022, 67 (11) 1405-1412; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09484

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Pediatric Simulation of Intrinsic PEEP and Patient-Ventilator Trigger Asynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation
Amanda J Nickel, Howard B Panitch, Joseph M McDonough, Etze Chotzoglou, Julian L Allen
Respiratory Care Nov 2022, 67 (11) 1405-1412; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09484
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • auto-PEEP
  • bench study
  • critical care
  • exhalation
  • intrinsic PEEP
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • pediatrics
  • respiratory mechanics report

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire