Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • 2022 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Use of a Viral Filter to Reduce Exposure to Exhaled Aerosol Does Not Affect Methacholine Dose Delivery During Bronchoprovocation Testing

Yosuf W Subat, Todd J Meyer, Keith D Torgerud, Kaiser G Lim, Paul D Scanlon and Alexander S Niven
Respiratory Care August 2022, 67 (8) 899-905; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.09703
Yosuf W Subat
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd J Meyer
Respiratory Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keith D Torgerud
Respiratory Care and Cardiopulmonary Diagnostics, Mayo Clinic, La Crosse, Wisconsin.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaiser G Lim
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul D Scanlon
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander S Niven
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Subat YW,
    2. Hainy ME,
    3. Torgerud KD,
    4. Sajgalik P,
    5. Guntupalli SK,
    6. Johnson BD,
    7. et al
    . Aerosol generation and mitigation during methacholine bronchoprovocation testing: infection control implications in the era of COVID-19. Respir Care 2021;66(12):1858-1865.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Coates AL,
    2. Wanger J,
    3. Cockcroft DW,
    4. Culver BH,
    5. Diamant Z,
    6. Gauvreau G,
    7. et al
    ; the Bronchoprovocation Testing Task Force. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests. Eur Respir J 2017;49(5):1601526.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tran K,
    2. Cimon K,
    3. Severn M,
    4. Pessoa-Silva CL,
    5. Conly J
    . Aerosol-generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to health care workers: a systematic review. PLoS One 2012;7(4):e35797-e35797.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Buonanno G,
    2. Stabile L,
    3. Morawska L
    . Estimation of airborne viral emission: quanta emission rate of SARS-CoV-2 for infection risk assessment. Environ Int 2020;141:105794-105794.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Chia PY,
    2. Coleman KK,
    3. Tan YK,
    4. Ong SWX,
    5. Gum M,
    6. Lau SK,
    7. et al
    ; Singapore 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak Research Team. Detection of air and surface contamination by SARS-CoV-2 in hospital rooms of infected patients. Nat Commun 2020;11(1):2800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    1. Fears AC,
    2. Klimstra WB,
    3. Duprex P,
    4. Hartman A,
    5. Weaver SC,
    6. Plante KS,
    7. et al
    . Persistence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in aerosol suspensions. Emerg Infect Dis 2020;26(9):2168-2171.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.
    1. Lednicky JA,
    2. Lauzard M,
    3. Fan ZH,
    4. Jutla A,
    5. Tilly TB,
    6. Gangwar M,
    7. et al
    . Viable SARS-CoV-2 in the air of a hospital room with COVID-19 patients. Int J Infect Dis 2020;100:476-482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Ning Z,
    3. Chen Y,
    4. Guo M,
    5. Liu Y,
    6. Gali NK,
    7. et al
    . Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals. Nature 2020;582(7813):557-560.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Meselson M
    . Droplets and aerosols in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. N Engl J Med 2020;382(21):2063-2063.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Ong SWX,
    2. Tan YK,
    3. Chia PY,
    4. Lee TH,
    5. Ng OT,
    6. Wong MSY,
    7. et al
    . Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient. Jama 2020;323(16):1610-1612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.
    1. Santarpia JL,
    2. Rivera DN,
    3. Herrera VL,
    4. Morwitzer MJ,
    5. Creager HM,
    6. Santarpia GW,
    7. et al
    . Aerosol and surface contamination of SARS-CoV-2 observed in quarantine and isolation care. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):12732.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    1. Sommerstein R,
    2. Fux CA,
    3. Vuichard-Gysin D,
    4. Abbas M,
    5. Marschall J,
    6. Balmelli C,
    7. et al
    ; Swissnoso. Risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission by aerosols, the rational use of masks, and protection of health care workers from COVID-19. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020;9(1):100.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.
    1. Somsen GA,
    2. van Rijn C,
    3. Kooij S,
    4. Bem RA,
    5. Bonn D
    . Small droplet aerosols in poorly ventilated spaces and SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8(7):658-659.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.
    1. Tang S,
    2. Mao Y,
    3. Jones RM,
    4. Tan Q,
    5. Ji JS,
    6. Li N,
    7. et al
    . Aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Evidence, prevention, and control. Environ Int 2020;144:106039-106039.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. van Doremalen N,
    2. Bushmaker T,
    3. Morris DH,
    4. Holbrook MG,
    5. Gamble A,
    6. Williamson BN,
    7. et al
    . Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020;382(16):1564-1567.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. US Pharmacopeia General Chapter 797
    . Pharmaceutical Compounding–Sterile Preparations. https://www.usp.org/compounding/general-chapter-797. Accessed September 23, 2021
  17. 17.↵
    1. Subat Y,
    2. Sajgalik P,
    3. Hainy M,
    4. Torgerud K,
    5. Guntupalli SK,
    6. Helgeson S,
    7. et al
    . Aerosol generation during methacholine challenge testing: clinical implications during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Thoracic Society 2021:A4473-A4473.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Dennis JH,
    2. Hendrick DJ
    . Design characteristics for drug nebulizers. J Med Eng Technol 1992;16(2):63-68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Methapharm. Nebulizer characterization for the methacholine challenge test. Available at: https://provocholine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Neb-characterization-technical-bulletin.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2021.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Coates A,
    2. Culver B,
    3. Cockcroft D,
    4. Hallstrand T,
    5. Haynes J,
    6. Kaminsky D,
    7. et al
    . Characterizing nebulizer performance for methacholine challenge tests. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;198(8):988-990.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Coates AL,
    2. Leung K,
    3. Dell SD
    . Developing alternative delivery systems for methacholine challenge tests. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2014;27(1):66-70.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    Trudell Medical Corporation. Methacholine guideline recommendations and the AeroEclipse II Breath Actuated Nebulizer. Available at: http://www.amc-ag.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/MCT-and-BAN-Dose-Calculation.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2021.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Helgeson SA,
    2. Lee AS,
    3. Patel NM,
    4. Taylor BJ,
    5. Lim KG,
    6. Niven AS
    . Cardiopulmonary exercise and the risk of aerosol generation while wearing a surgical mask. Chest 2021;159(4):1567-1569.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.
    1. Helgeson SA,
    2. Lim KG,
    3. Lee AS,
    4. Niven AS,
    5. Patel NM
    . Aerosol generation during spirometry. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2020;17(12):1637-1639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Subat YW,
    2. Guntupalli SK,
    3. Sajgalik P,
    4. Hainy ME,
    5. Torgerud KD,
    6. Helgeson SA,
    7. et al
    . Aerosol generation during peak flow testing: clinical implications for COVID-19. Respir Care 2021.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Jing G,
    3. Fink JB,
    4. Porszasz J,
    5. Moran EM,
    6. Kiourkas RD,
    7. et al
    . Airborne particulate concentrations during and after pulmonary function testing. Chest 2021;159(4):1570-1574.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Biddiscombe MF,
    2. Meah SN,
    3. Underwood SR,
    4. Usmani OS
    . Comparing lung regions of interest in gamma scintigraphy for assessing inhaled therapeutic aerosol deposition. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2011;24(3):165-173.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Sanchez-Crespo A
    . Lung scintigraphy in the assessment of aerosol deposition and clearance. Semin Nucl Med 2019;49(1):47-57.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Cockcroft DW,
    2. Hurst TS,
    3. Gore BP
    . Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests. Chest 1989;96(3):505-508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Coates AL,
    2. MacNeish CF,
    3. Allen PD,
    4. Ho SL,
    5. Lands LC
    . Do sinusoidal models of respiration accurately reflect the respiratory events of patients breathing on nebulizers? J Aerosol Med 1999;12(4):265-273.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Laube BL,
    2. Adams GK 3rd.,
    3. Norman PS,
    4. Rosenthal RR
    . The effect of inspiratory flow rate regulation on nebulizer output and on human airway response to methacholine aerosol. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1985;76(5):708-713.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Brain JD,
    2. Valberg PA
    . Deposition of aerosol in the respiratory tract. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979;120(6):1325-1373.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Christiani DC,
    2. Kern DG
    . Asthma risk and occupation as a respiratory therapist. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148(3):671-674.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.
    1. Dimich-Ward H,
    2. Wymer ML,
    3. Chan-Yeung M
    . Respiratory health survey of respiratory therapists. Chest 2004;126(4):1048-1053.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Kern DG,
    2. Frumkin H
    . Asthma in respiratory therapists. Ann Intern Med 1989;110(10):767-773.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Cockcroft DW
    . Methacholine challenge. PD20 versus PC20. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015;12(3):291-292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 67 (8)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 67, Issue 8
1 Aug 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of a Viral Filter to Reduce Exposure to Exhaled Aerosol Does Not Affect Methacholine Dose Delivery During Bronchoprovocation Testing
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Use of a Viral Filter to Reduce Exposure to Exhaled Aerosol Does Not Affect Methacholine Dose Delivery During Bronchoprovocation Testing
Yosuf W Subat, Todd J Meyer, Keith D Torgerud, Kaiser G Lim, Paul D Scanlon, Alexander S Niven
Respiratory Care Aug 2022, 67 (8) 899-905; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09703

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Use of a Viral Filter to Reduce Exposure to Exhaled Aerosol Does Not Affect Methacholine Dose Delivery During Bronchoprovocation Testing
Yosuf W Subat, Todd J Meyer, Keith D Torgerud, Kaiser G Lim, Paul D Scanlon, Alexander S Niven
Respiratory Care Aug 2022, 67 (8) 899-905; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09703
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • methacholine
  • aerosol
  • Asthma
  • COVID-19
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • infection control

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire