This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pneumonia from COVID-19 that results in ARDS may require invasive mechanical ventilation. This retrospective study assessed the characteristics and outcomes of subjects with COVID-19–associated ARDS versus ARDS (non-COVID) during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The primary objective was to determine whether mechanical ventilation duration differed between these cohorts and identify other potential contributory factors.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified 73 subjects admitted between March 1 and August 12, 2020, with either COVID-19–associated ARDS (37) or ARDS (36) who were managed with the lung protective ventilator protocol and required >48 h of mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria were the following: <18 years old or the patient required tracheostomy or interfacility transfer. Demographic and baseline clinical data were collected at ARDS onset (ARDS day 0), with subsequent data collected on ARDS days 1–3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 21. Comparisons were made by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (continuous variables) and chi-square test (categorical variables) stratified by COVID-19 status. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed the cause-specific hazard ratio for extubation.
RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) mechanical ventilation duration among the subjects who survived to extubation was longer in those with COVID-19-ARDS versus the subjects with non-COVID ARDS: 10 (6–20) d versus 4 (2–8) d; P < .001. Hospital mortality was not different between the two groups (22% vs 39%; P = .11). The competing risks Cox proportional hazard analysis (fit among the total sample, including non-survivors) revealed that improved compliance of the respiratory system and oxygenation were associated with the probability of extubation. Oxygenation improved at a lower rate in the subjects with COVID-19–associated ARDS than in the subjects with non-COVID ARDS.
CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical ventilation duration was longer in subjects with COVID-19–associated ARDS compared with the subjects with non-COVID ARDS, which may be explained by a lower rate of improvement in oxygenation status.
Footnotes
- Correspondence: Gregory D Burns MAS RRT, Respiratory Care Division, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care,University of California, San Francisco at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA 94110. E-mail: Gregory.burns{at}ucsf.edu
Mr Kallet discloses relationships with ContinuED, Lungpacer Medical, and the Asthma & Allergy Prevention Company. Mr Phillips discloses relationships with ContinuED and Saxe Communications. The other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
See the Related Editorial on Page 1475
- Copyright © 2023 by Daedalus Enterprises
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.
