Bronchodilator Response in FEF_25–75 for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Children

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   Global Initiative for Asthma - GINA. 2020 GINA Main Report. Available at: https://ginasthma.org/gina-reports. Accessed February 6, 2021.
2. 2.↵
   1. Coates AL,
   2. Wanger J,
   3. Cockcroft DW,
   4. Culver BH,
   5. Diamant Z,
   6. Gauvreau G,
   7. et al

   . ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests. Eur Respir J 2017;49(5)1601526.
3. 3.
   1. Looijmans-Van Den Akker I,
   2. Van Luijn K,
   3. Verheij T

   . Overdiagnosis of asthma in children in primary care: a retrospective analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2016;66(644):e152-e157.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Gaillard EA,
   2. Kuehni CE,
   3. Turner S,
   4. Goutaki M,
   5. Holden KA,
   6. De Jong CCM,
   7. et al

   . European Respiratory Society clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in children aged 5–16 years. Eur Respir J 2021;58(5)2004173.
5. 5.↵
   1. Cockcroft DW

   . Direct challenge tests: airway hyper-responsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance. Chest 2010;138(2 Suppl):18S-24S.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Selvanathan J,
   2. Aaron SD,
   3. Sykes JR,
   4. Vandemheen KL,
   5. FitzGerald JM,
   6. Ainslie M,
   7. et al

   ; Canadian Respiratory Research Network. Performance characteristics of spirometry with negative bronchodilator response and methacholine challenge testing and implications for asthma diagnosis. Chest 2020;158(2):479-490.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Hallstrand TS,
   2. Leuppi JD,
   3. Joos G,
   4. Hall GL,
   5. Carlsen KH,
   6. Kaminsky DA,
   7. et al

   . ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: pathophysiology and methodology of indirect airway challenge testing. Eur Respir J 2018;52(5)1801033.
8. 8.↵
   1. Lebecque P,
   2. Kiakulanda P,
   3. Coates AL

   . Spirometry in the asthmatic child: is FEF_25–75% a more sensitive test than FEV₁/FVC? Pediatr Pulmonol 1993;16(1):19-22.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Simon MR,
   2. Chinchilli VM,
   3. Phillips BR,
   4. Sorkness CA,
   5. Lemanske RF,
   6. Szefler SJ,
   7. et al

   ; Childhood Asthma Research and Education Network of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. FEF_25–75% and FEV₁/FVC in relation to clinical and physiologic parameters in asthmatic children with normal FEV₁ values. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;126(3):527.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Scichilone N,
    2. Battaglia S,
    3. Olivieri D,
    4. Bellia V

    . The role of small airways in monitoring the response to asthma treatment: what is beyond FEV₁? Allergy 2009;64(11):1563-1569.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Rao DR,
    2. Gaffin JM,
    3. Baxi SN,
    4. Sheehan WJ,
    5. Hoffman EB,
    6. Phipatanakul W

    . The utility of forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity in predicting childhood asthma morbidity and severity. J Asthma 2012;49(6):586-592.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Mallol J,
    2. Riquelme C,
    3. Aguirre V,
    4. Martínez M,
    5. Gallardo A,
    6. Sánchez C,
    7. Córdova P

    . Value of bronchial reversibility to salbutamol, exhaled nitric oxide, and responsiveness to methacholine to corroborate the diagnosis of asthma in children. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2020;48(3):214-222.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Quanjer PH,
    2. Weiner DJ,
    3. Pretto JJ,
    4. Brazzale DJ,
    5. Boros PW

    . Measurement of FEF_25–75% and FEF_75% does not contribute to clinical decision making. Eur Respir J 2014;43(4):1051-1058.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Lukic KZ,
    2. Coates AL

    . Does the FEF_25–75% or the FEF_75% have any value in assessing lung disease in children with cystic fibrosis or asthma? Pediatr Pulmonol 2015;50(9):863-868.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.↵
    1. Cottini M,
    2. Lombardi C,
    3. Berti A,
    4. Comberiati P

    . Small-airway dysfunction in pediatric asthma. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2021;21(2):128-134.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Caussade S,
    2. Saavedra M,
    3. Barrientos H,
    4. Linares M,
    5. Aguirre V,
    6. Puppo H,
    7. et al

    . Actualización en espirometría y curva flujo/volumen en escolares y adolescentes. Neumol Pediátr 2019;14(1):41-51.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    1. Graham BL,
    2. Steenbruggen I,
    3. Miller MR,
    4. Barjaktarevic IZ,
    5. Cooper BG,
    6. Hall GL,
    7. et al

    . Standardization of spirometry 2019 update. An official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society technical statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200(8):e70-e88.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Quanjer PH,
    2. Stanojevic S,
    3. Cole TJ,
    4. Baur X,
    5. Hall GL,
    6. Culver BH,
    7. et al

    ; ERS Global Lung Function Initiative. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95 y age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J 2012;40(6):1324-1343.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Davis BE,
    2. Cockcroft DW

    . Past, present, and future uses of methacholine testing. Expert Rev Respir Med 2012;6(3):321-329.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Anderson SD

    . “Indirect” challenges from science to clinical practice. Eur Clin Respir J 2016;3:31096.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.↵
    1. Danvers L,
    2. Lo DKH,
    3. Gaillard EA

    . The role of objective tests to support a diagnosis of asthma in children. Paediatr Respir Rev 2020;33:52-57.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.↵
    1. Pellegrino R,
    2. Antonelli A,
    3. Crimi E,
    4. Gulotta C,
    5. Torchio R,
    6. Dutto L,
    7. et al

    . Dependence of bronchoconstrictor and bronchodilator responses on thoracic gas compression volume. Respirology 2014;19(7):1040-1045.

    OpenUrl
23. 23.↵
    1. Kim Y,
    2. Lee H,
    3. Chung SJ,
    4. Yeo Y,
    5. Park TS,
    6. Park DW,
    7. et al

    . The usefulness of FEF_25–75% in predicting airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol. J Asthma Allergy 2021;14:1267-1275.

    OpenUrl
24. 24.↵
    1. Qin R,
    2. An J,
    3. Xie J,
    4. Huang R,
    5. Xie Y,
    6. He L,
    7. et al

    . FEF_25–75% is a more sensitive measure reflecting airway dysfunction in subjects with asthma: a comparison study using FEF_25–75% and FEV₁. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2021;9(10):3649-3659.e6.

    OpenUrl
25. 25.↵
    1. Stanojevic S,
    2. Kaminsky DA,
    3. Miller MR,
    4. Thompson B,
    5. Aliverti A,
    6. Barjaktarevic I,
    7. et al

    . ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests. Eur Respir J 2022;60(1):2101499.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Ciprandi G,
    2. Gallo F,
    3. Cirillo I

    . FEF_25–75% and asthma in clinical practice. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018;17(3):295-297.

    OpenUrl