Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2022
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2023 Open Forum
    • 2023 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

In Vitro Model for Analysis of High-Flow Aerosol Delivery During Continuous Nebulization

Michael McPeck, Jane Moon, Jeyanthan Jayakumaran and Gerald C Smaldone
Respiratory Care September 2023, 68 (9) 1213-1220; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.10643
Michael McPeck
Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane Moon
Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeyanthan Jayakumaran
Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerald C Smaldone
Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To understand the fate of aerosols delivered by high-flow nasal cannula using continuous nebulization, an open-source anatomical model was developed and validated with a modified real-time gamma ratemeter technique. Mass balance defined circuit losses. Responsiveness to infusion rate and device technology were tested.

METHODS: A nasal airway cast derived from a computed tomography scan was converted to a 3-dimensional–printed head and face structure connected to a piston ventilator (breathing frequency 30 breaths/min, tidal volume 750 mL, duty cycle 0.50). For mass balance experiments, saline mixed with Technetium-99m was infused for 1 h. Aerosol delivery was measured using a gamma ratemeter oriented to an inhaled mass filter at the hypopharynx of the model. Background and dead-space effects were minimized. All components were imaged by scintigraphy. Continuous nebulization was tested at infusion rates of 10–40 mL/h with gas flow of 60 L/min using a breath-enhanced jet nebulizer (BEJN), and a vibrating mesh nebulizer. Drug delivery rates were defined by the slope of ratemeter counts/min (CPM/min) versus time (min).

RESULTS: The major source of aerosol loss was at the nasal interface (∼25%). Significant differences in deposition on circuit components were seen between nebulizers. The nebulizer residual was higher for BEJN (P = .006), and circuit losses, including the humidifier, were higher for vibrating mesh nebulizer (P = .006). There were no differences in delivery to the filter and head model. For 60 L/min gas flow, as infusion pump flow was increased, the rate of aerosol delivery (CPM/min) increased, for BEJN from 338 to 8,111; for vibrating mesh nebulizer, maximum delivery was 2,828.

CONCLUSIONS: The model defined sites of aerosol losses during continuous nebulization and provided a realistic in vitro system for testing aerosol delivery during continuous nebulization. Real-time analysis can quantify effects of multiple changes in variables (nebulizer technology, infusion rate, gas flow, and ventilation) during a given experiment.

  • high-flow nasal cannula
  • aerosol
  • continuous nebulization
  • nasal deposition

Footnotes

  • Correspondence: Gerald C Smaldone MD PhD, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, 100 Nicolls Road/T17-040 Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, NY 11794–3869. E-mail: gerald.smaldone{at}stonybrook.edu
  • The State University of New York at Stony Brook holds patents in the fields of nebulizer development and inhaled drug delivery that have been licensed to InspiRx. Dr Smaldone discloses a relationship with InspiRx. The remaining authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

  • A version of this paper was presented by Dr Smaldone as an Open Forum abstract at the AARC Congress 2022, held in New Orleans, Louisiana, November 9–12, 2022.

  • Fisher & Paykel Healthcare provided equipment used in this study.

  • Supplementary material related to this paper is available at http://www.rcjournal.com.

  • See the Related Editorial on Page 1325

  • Copyright © 2023 by Daedalus Enterprises
View Full Text

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 68 (9)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 68, Issue 9
1 Sep 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro Model for Analysis of High-Flow Aerosol Delivery During Continuous Nebulization
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In Vitro Model for Analysis of High-Flow Aerosol Delivery During Continuous Nebulization
Michael McPeck, Jane Moon, Jeyanthan Jayakumaran, Gerald C Smaldone
Respiratory Care Sep 2023, 68 (9) 1213-1220; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10643

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
In Vitro Model for Analysis of High-Flow Aerosol Delivery During Continuous Nebulization
Michael McPeck, Jane Moon, Jeyanthan Jayakumaran, Gerald C Smaldone
Respiratory Care Sep 2023, 68 (9) 1213-1220; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10643
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Keywords

  • high-flow nasal cannula
  • aerosol
  • continuous nebulization
  • nasal deposition

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire