Skip to main content
 

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Open Forum
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Association for Respiratory Care
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
American Association for Respiratory Care

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Editor's Commentary
    • Coming Next Month
    • Archives
    • Most-Read Papers of 2021
  • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Reviewers
    • Reviewer Information
    • Create Reviewer Account
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Original Research
    • Reviewer Guidelines: Reviews
    • Appreciation of Reviewers
  • CRCE
    • Through the Journal
    • JournalCasts
    • AARC University
    • PowerPoint Template
  • Open Forum
    • 2022 Open Forum
    • 2021 Abstracts
    • Previous Open Forums
  • Podcast
    • English
    • Español
    • Portugûes
    • 国语
  • Videos
    • Video Abstracts
    • Author Interviews
    • Highlighted Articles
    • The Journal
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
Review ArticleSystematic Review

Identification and Prevention of Extubation Failure in Adults using an Automated Continuous Monitoring Alert vs Standard Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ramandeep Kaur, David L Vines, Lauren Harnois, Ahmad Elshafei, Tricia Johnson and Robert A Balk
Respiratory Care March 2022, respcare.09860; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.09860
Ramandeep Kaur
Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
David L Vines
Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Harnois
Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ahmad Elshafei
Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tricia Johnson
Health Systems Management, College of Health Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert A Balk
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Post extubation monitoring helps identify patients at risk of developing respiratory failure. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of our standard respiratory therapist (RT) assessment tool versus an automated continuous monitoring alert to initiate RT driven care on the reintubation rate.

Methods: This was a single-center randomized clinical trial of adult subjects who received mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours and underwent planned extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) from March 2020 to September 2021. Subjects were assigned to standard RT assessment tool or an automated monitoring alert to identify the need for RT driven care. Primary outcome was need for reintubation due to respiratory failure within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included reintubation within 7 days, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), hospital mortality, ICU cost and RT time associated with patient assessment and therapy provision.

Results: Of 234 randomized subjects, 32 were excluded from the primary analysis due to disruption in RT driven care during the COVID-19 patient surge and 1 due to delay in Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) monitoring initiation. Analysis of the primary outcome included 85 subjects assigned to the standard RT assessment group and 116 assigned to the automated monitoring alert group to initiate RT driven care. There was no significant difference between the study groups in reintubation rate, median LOS, mortality, or ICU costs. RT time associated with patient assessment (p<0.001) and therapy provided (p=0.031) were significantly lower in the automated continuous monitoring alert group.

Conclusions: In patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours, there were no significant outcome or cost differences between our standard RT assessment tool or an automated monitoring alert to initiate RT driven care. Using an automated continuous monitoring alert to initiate RT driven care saved RT time.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04231890

Footnotes

  • Corresponding author:
    Ramandeep Kaur PhD, RRT, RRT-ACCS. Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University. 1620 W Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, United States. Ramandeep_kaur{at}rush.edu
  • Received January 21, 2022.
  • Accepted March 17, 2022.
  • Copyright © 2022 by Daedalus Enterprises

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$30.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Respiratory Care: 67 (8)
Respiratory Care
Vol. 67, Issue 8
1 Aug 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

 

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Association for Respiratory Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification and Prevention of Extubation Failure in Adults using an Automated Continuous Monitoring Alert vs Standard Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Association for Respiratory Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Association for Respiratory Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Identification and Prevention of Extubation Failure in Adults using an Automated Continuous Monitoring Alert vs Standard Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ramandeep Kaur, David L Vines, Lauren Harnois, Ahmad Elshafei, Tricia Johnson, Robert A Balk
Respiratory Care Mar 2022, respcare.09860; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09860

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Identification and Prevention of Extubation Failure in Adults using an Automated Continuous Monitoring Alert vs Standard Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ramandeep Kaur, David L Vines, Lauren Harnois, Ahmad Elshafei, Tricia Johnson, Robert A Balk
Respiratory Care Mar 2022, respcare.09860; DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09860
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Info For

  • Subscribers
  • Institutions
  • Advertisers

About Us

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Reprints/Permissions

AARC

  • Membership
  • Meetings
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

More

  • Contact Us
  • RSS
American Association for Respiratory Care

Print ISSN: 0020-1324        Online ISSN: 1943-3654

© Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.

Powered by HighWire