PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Alexandre Boyer AU - Julien Goret AU - Benjamin Clouzeau AU - Antoine Romen AU - Renaud Prevel AU - Edouard Lhomme AU - Frédéric Vargas AU - Gilles Hilbert AU - Cecile Bébéar AU - Didier Gruson AU - Fatima M'Zali TI - Tailoring Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy in Subjects With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia With a 10-Hour E-Test Approach AID - 10.4187/respcare.06255 DP - 2019 Mar 01 TA - Respiratory Care PG - 307--312 VI - 64 IP - 3 4099 - http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/64/3/307.short 4100 - http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/64/3/307.full AB - BACKGROUND: In a previous study of subjects suspected of having ventilator-associated pneumonia, a rapid susceptibility testing approach by using ETEST (BioMérieux) strips directly applied to bronchoalveolar lavage samples provided valuable information at hour 24. The primary objective of this study was to assess a new direct specimen testing by using an even more-rapid E-test approach (at hour 10), which could promote an early de-escalation of the antimicrobial therapy.METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects with ventilator-associated pneumonia admitted to a medical ICU were prospectively included. In parallel with standard routine methods, E-test strips were directly applied onto agar plates seeded with bronchoalveolar lavage samples and were analyzed after 10 h of incubation. E-test results were used to identify potential drug choices by simulating clinical decision making if the microscopy results had been available at the point of care. These choices were analyzed for concordance with the narrowest adequate antimicrobial therapy according to the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) provided by the reference method (ie, the laboratory routine diagnostic).RESULTS: At hour 10, direct specimen testing was readable in 18 of 28 bronchoalveolar lavage samples (64%). Total agreement between the 10-h direct specimen testing approach and the laboratory routine diagnostic approach was 90%, with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 95%, with 8% major errors and 3% very major errors. The concordance between the 2 tests was very good (kappa = 0.79). If the 10-h E-test results were taken into account, then an early de-escalation strategy would have been possible in 10 of 18 cases (55%) at hour 10.CONCLUSIONS: This rapid susceptibility testing approach provided early (10 h) and valuable information that could lead to an early adjustment of empirical antimicrobial treatment in a ventilator-associated pneumonia setting. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01266863.)