TY - JOUR T1 - Diagnostic Performance of Carbon Monoxide Testing by Pulse Oximetry in the Emergency Department JF - Respiratory Care SP - 1351 LP - 1357 DO - 10.4187/respcare.06365 VL - 64 IS - 11 AU - Nuria Villalba AU - Zachary T Osborn AU - Pamela R Derickson AU - Chelsea T Manning AU - Robert R Herrington AU - David A Kaminsky AU - Kalev Freeman Y1 - 2019/11/01 UR - http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/64/11/1351.abstract N2 - BACKGROUND: Carbon monoxide (CO) exposure causes roughly 40,000 emergency department (ED) visits annually and is commonly misdiagnosed. Whereas the standard method of carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO) measurement utilizes blood gas analysis, a noninvasive, FDA-cleared alternative exists. We evaluated the performance of pulse oximetry (SpCO) for identification of CO exposure in ED patients.METHODS: We compared pulse oximetry to blood HbCO levels in a prospective observational study of adult and pediatric subjects recruited from the ED. Nurses screened a convenience sample of patients and referred those with SpCO ≥ 10% to research staff. Researchers also approached individuals who presented with signs and symptoms of CO toxicity. We determined diagnostic performance with a Bland-Altman analysis and calculated sensitivity and specificity for detection of elevated HbCO at thresholds of ≥ 10% and ≥ 15%. To optimize the potential sensitivity of SpCO for detection of CO toxicity, research technicians performed 3 SpCO readings within 5 min of the blood draw for laboratory measurement. A positive SpCO test was defined as any SpCO ≥ 10%.RESULTS: 42,000 patients were screened, 212 were evaluated, and 126 subjects were enrolled. Median HbCO level was 6% (range 1.6–21.9%). Limits of agreement were −10.3% and 8.1%. Of 23 individuals with elevated HbCO ≥ 10%, 13 were not suspected based on clinical assessment. Critically elevated HbCO was present in 6 individuals. Based on our a priori threshold of 10% for a positive test, pulse oximetry identified 14 of 23 subjects with HbCO ≥ 10%, with a sensitivity of 61% (95% CI 39–80%) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI 78–92%), and 5 of 6 subjects with HbCO ≥ 15%, with a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI 36–100%) and a specificity of 81% (95% CI 73–87%).CONCLUSIONS: Pulse oximetry underestimated HbCO and produced false negative results (ie, SpCO < 10% for all three measurements) in 17% of ED subjects with elevated HbCO ≥ 15%. Triage screening with pulse oximetry detected cases of elevated HbCO that were not suspected by the clinical provider. ER -