RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Evaluation of a Closed Suction System with Integrated Tube Scraping Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial JF Respiratory Care FD American Association for Respiratory Care SP respcare.10830 DO 10.4187/respcare.10830 A1 Ramandeep Kaur A1 J. Brady Scott A1 Tyler T. Weiss A1 Andrew Klein A1 Megan E. Charlton A1 Kimberly A. Villanueva A1 Robert A. Balk A1 David L. Vines YR 2023 UL http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/early/2023/01/20/respcare.10830.abstract AB BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tube (ETT) scraping or sweeping refers to mucus removal from an ETT that can increase airway resistance. The study objective was to evaluate the effect of ETT scraping on the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), time to first successful spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), duration of hospital stay, and occurrence of ventilator-associated events (VAE).METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized clinical trial of adult subjects intubated between October 2019 and October 2021. Subjects were randomly assigned to either ETT suctioning via a standard in-line suction catheter (control group) or ETT suctioning and scraping via a suction catheter with balloon sweeping technology (experimental group). Airway suctioning was performed as clinically indicated, and ETT was scraped every time a respiratory therapist suctioned the patient. The study outcome was duration of MV, time to first successful SBT, hospital stay, and VAE rate. Intent to treat statistical analysis was performed.RESULTS: Of 272 randomized subjects, the median age was 63 (IQR 52–73) years, 143 (53%) were males, and 154 (57%) had a primary diagnosis of acute respiratory failure. There were no significant differences between the groups in median duration (hours) of MV [72.2 (37-187) vs 70.6 (37-148); P = 0.58]. There was no significant difference between the study groups in median time (hours) to the first successful SBT [46.7 (IQR 30–87) vs 45.7 (IQR 27–95), P = 0.81], length of hospital stay (P = 0.76), the incidences of ventilator-associated conditions (P = 0.13), or infection-related ventilator-associated complications (P = 0.47).CONCLUSION: ETT suctioning plus scraping, compared to ETT suctioning alone, did not significantly improve the duration of mechanical ventilation, time to first successful SBT, length of hospital stay, and VAE. These study findings do not support the routine use of ETT scraping for mechanically ventilated patients.