Skip to main content

Comparing Brain Tissue Oxygen Measurements and Derived Autoregulation Parameters from Different Probes (Licox vs. Raumedic)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 114))

Abstract

We investigated two commercially available probes for measurement of the partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen (PbrO2) and calculation of the index of brain tissue oxygen pressure reactivity (ORx) in 7 patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Simultaneous monitoring of PbrO2 using the Licox® probe and the multiparameter Raumedic probe (Neurovent PTO®), measuring PbrO2, intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain temperature (Neurovent PTO) was performed for a median of 9 days (range 7–17 days). Both probes provided stable monitoring throughout the desired period. Mean PbrO2 from Licox and Neurovent PTO was 16.1 ± 9.0 mmHg and 17.5 ± 11.9 mmHg respectively. Mean ORx was 0.35 ± 0.44 and 0.31 ± 0.43 respectively. There was a difference in the measurement of PbrO2 of –2.73 ± 10.1 mmHg (Licox – Raumedic). The difference in the two values for the calculated ORx was far smaller (0.03 ± 0.31; Licox – Raumedic) and the correlation coefficient higher than for both values of PbrO2 (0.76 for ORx vs. 0.56 for PbrO2). The calculation of the autoregulation parameter ORx seemed more independent of the measurement process than the measurement of PbrO2 itself and signifies the potential clinical importance of this parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Czosnyka M, Whitehouse H, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Pickard JD (1994) Computer supported multimodal monitoring in neuro intensive care. Int J Clin Monit Comput 11(4):223–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huschak G, Hoell T, Hohaus C, Kern C, Minkus Y, Meisel HJ (2009) Clinical evaluation of a new multiparameter neuromonitoring device: measurement of brain tissue oxygen, brain temperature, and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaeger M, Schuhmann MU, Soehle M, Meixensberger J (2006) Continuous assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation after traumatic brain injury using brain tissue oxygen pressure reactivity. Crit Care Med 34(6):1783–1788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaeger M, Schuhmann MU, Soehle M, Nagel C, Meixensberger J (2007) Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage by brain tissue oxygen pressure reactivity and its relation to delayed cerebral infarction. Stroke 38(3):981–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaeger M, Dengl M, Meixensberger J, Schuhmann MU (2010) Effects of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity-guided optimization of cerebral perfusion pressure on brain tissue oxygenation after traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 38(5):1343–1347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meixensberger J, Jaeger M, Väth A, Dings J, Kunze E, Roosen K (2003) Brain tissue oxygen guided treatment supplementing ICP/CPP therapy after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(6):760–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Purins K, Enblad P, Sandhagen B, Lewén A (2010) Brain tissue oxygen monitoring: a study of in vitro accuracy and stability of Neurovent-PTO and Licox sensors. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(4):681–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This study was supported by the RAUMEDIC AG through supplying the monitoring device at no cost. The authors declare that they have no other conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Dengl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dengl, M., Jaeger, M., Renner, C., Meixensberger, J. (2012). Comparing Brain Tissue Oxygen Measurements and Derived Autoregulation Parameters from Different Probes (Licox vs. Raumedic). In: Schuhmann, M., Czosnyka, M. (eds) Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XIV. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 114. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0955-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0956-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics