Skip to main content
Log in

Interest of an objective evaluation of cough during weaning from mechanical ventilation

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate an objective measure of cough strength, the peak cough expiratory flow (PCEF), as a predictive criterion of success or failure of extubation.

Methods

Patients under mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h who successfully passed the spontaneous breathing trial were included in the study. Just before extubation, PCEF was measured with an electronic flowmeter.

Results

A total of 130 patients were included. The median duration of mechanical ventilation before extubation was 8 days (4–17). Fourteen patients (10.8%) failed extubation. The sole factor significantly associated with extubation failure was the measure of PCEF. The patients who did not cough at order had a higher rate of extubation failure than those who did (= 0.03). The mean PCEF of patients who failed extubation (36.3 ± 15 l/min) was significantly lower than the one of patients who succeeded (63.6 ± 32 l/min) (P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value of PCEF was 35 l/min. Overall, an inability to cough at order or a PCEF ≤35 l/min predicted extubation failure with a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 71%. The risk of extubation failure was 24% for the patients who did not cough at order or with a PCEF ≤35 l/min and 3.5% for those with a PCEF >35 l/min [RR = 6.9 (95% CI, 2–24); P = 0.002].

Conclusions

This study confirmed the interest of measuring the PCEF to predict extubation outcome in patients having successfully passed the spontaneous breathing trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, Alia I, Brochard L, Stewart T, Benito S, Epstein S, Apezteguia C, Nightingale P, Arroliga AC, Tobin MJ (2002) Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA 287:345–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Torres A, Gatell JM, Aznar E, El-Ebiary M, Puig de la Bellacasa J, Gonzalez J, Ferrer M, Rodriguez-Roisin R (1995) Re-intubation increases the risk of nosocomial pneumonia in patients needing mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152:137–141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL, Wong JB (1997) Effect of failed extubation on the outcome of mechanical ventilation. Chest 112:186–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein SK (2002) Decision to extubate. Intensive Care Med 28:535–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beuret P, Nourdine K, Roux C, Carton MJ, Kaaki M, Ducreux JC (2008) Interest of an objective evaluation of cough during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 34(Suppl 1):S78

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boles J-M, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B, Melot C, Pearl R, Silverman H, Stanchina M, Vieillard-Baron A, Welte T (2007) Weaning from mechanical ventilation: statement of the Sixth International Consensus Conference on Intensive Care Medicine. Eur Respir J 29:1033–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fonseca JA, Costa-Pereira A, Delgado L, Silva LN, Magalhaes M, Castel-Branco MG, Vaz M (2005) Pulmonary function electronic monitoring devices: a randomized agreement study. Chest 128:1258–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boitano LJ (2006) Management of airway clearance in neuromuscular disease. Respir Care 51:913–922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smina M, Salam A, Khamiees M, Gada P, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA (2003) Cough peak flows and extubation outcomes. Chest 124:262–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salam A, Tilluckdharry L, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA (2004) Neurologic status, cough, secretions and extubation outcomes. Intensive Care Med 30:1334–1339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouvier F, Richard A, Ancellin L, Diaz V, Chatellier D, Pinsard M, Robert R (2008) Mesure objective de la toux avant l’extubation: à la recherche d’un outil simple. Réanimation 17(Suppl 1):S 75

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson N, Esteban A, Epstein SK, Arabi Y, Apezteguia C, Gonzalez M, Hill NS, Nava S, D’Empaire G, Anzueto A (2006) Risk factors for extubation failure in patients following a successful spontaneous breathing trial. Chest 130:1664–1671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khamiees M, Raju P, DeGirolamo A, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA (2001) Predictors of extubation outcome in patients who have successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial. Chest 120:1262–1270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mokhlesi B, Tulaimat A, Gluckman TJ, Wang Y, Evans AT, Corbridge TC (2007) Predicting extubation failure after successful completion of a spontaneous breathing trial. Respir Care 52:1710–1717

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Namen AM, Ely EW, Tatter SB, Case LD, Lucia MA, Smith A, Landry S, Wilson JA, Glazier SS, Branch CL, Kelly DL, Bowton DL, Haponik EF (2001) Predictors of successful extubation in neurosurgical patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163:658–664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Coplin WM, Pierson DJ, Cooley KD, Newell DW, Rubenfeld GD (2000) Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161:1530–1536

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Beuret.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beuret, P., Roux, C., Auclair, A. et al. Interest of an objective evaluation of cough during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 35, 1090–1093 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1404-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1404-9

Keywords

Navigation