Elsevier

The Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volume 7, Issue 2, March–April 1989, Pages 129-132
The Journal of Emergency Medicine

Original contribution
Respiratory rates in emergency department patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(89)90257-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The respiratory rate is a sensitive and nonspecific indicator of respiratory dysfunction. Establishing a “normal” respiratory rate has mainly been arbitrary. This study evaluated “normal” respiratory rates in 110 emergency department patients. The mean respiratory rate was 20.1 (±4.0). Women had a more rapid respiratory rate 20.9 (±3.9) than men 19.4 (±4.0) (p<.04). Smokers had a higher respiratory rate 20.5 (±4.0) than nonsmokers 19.3 (±4.0), but this was not statistically significant (P=0.124). It was also noted that the respiratory rate measured by the nurse was almost always different from that measured by the medical student (P<0.0001). Based on a review of the literature concerning what constitutes a “normal” respiratory rate, we conclude that the “normal” respiratory rate may be higher than that suggested in the medical literature.

References (28)

  • R.G. McMurray et al.

    Respiratory responses to running and walking at the same metabolic rate

    Resp Physiol

    (1982)
  • W.R. Bell et al.

    The clinical features of submassive and massive pulmonary emboli

    Am J Med

    (1977)
  • R.C. Kory

    Routine measurement of respiratory rate: an expensive tribute to tradition

    JAMA

    (1957)
  • J. Hutchinson et al.
  • T.R. Gravelyn et al.

    Respiratory rate as an indicator of acute respiratory dysfunction

    JAMA

    (1980)
  • J.P. McFadden et al.

    Raised respiratory rate in elderly patients: a valuable physical sign

    Br Med J

    (1982)
  • W.H.S. Jones

    Hippocrates

  • R.H. Dailey

    Approach to patient in emergency department

  • B. Bates

    A guide to physical examination

  • T.N. Stern

    Clinical examination: a textbook of physical diagnosis

  • J.K. Siegfried

    Physical diagnosis

  • J.W. Burnside et al.

    Physical diagnosis

  • R.L. DeGowin

    Bedside diagnostic examination

  • C.H. Best et al.

    The physiologic basis of medical practice

  • Cited by (58)

    • Make vital signs great again – A call for action

      2017, European Journal of Internal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Measurement techniques can intrinsically alter breathing dynamics and the respiratory rate itself, thus influencing the validity of their results [125]. Casual observations or “spot” checks are known to produce unreliable assessments of respiratory rate [126]. However, a simple software “app” is now available that may improve the speed and accuracy of respiratory rate measurement at the bedside [127].

    • Bard denali inferior vena cava filter fracture and embolization resulting in cardiac tamponade: A device failure analysis

      2015, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, the FDA and American Society for Testing and Materials recommend demonstration of implanted device durability over the equivalent of 10 years of real-time use under physiologic loading that simulates in vivo conditions in the human body (11,12). Given the respiratory-dependent changes of the vena cava and an estimated respiratory rate of 28,800 breaths per day (13), this means an IVC filter should be designed to withstand at least 100 million respiratory cycles. However, the deformations and stresses associated with these cycles may vary among patients.

    • Respiratory rate assessments using a dual-accelerometer device

      2014, Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text