Use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure as treatment of childhood obstructive sleep apnea,☆☆,,★★

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Thoracic Society, Boston, Mass., May 1994.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70262-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during childhood and the effects of growth and maturation on CPAP requirements. Design: Retrospective study with use of a written questionnaire administered to pediatric practitioners treating sleep disorders. Setting: Nine academic pediatric sleep disorders centers. Results: Data were obtained for 94 patients. Three percent of patients receiving CPAP were less than 1 year, 29% were 1 to 5 years, 36% were 6 to 12 years, and 32% were 13 to 19 years of age; 64% were boys. The longest duration of CPAP use was 4 years. Indications for CPAP included OSA associated with obesity (27%), craniofacial anomalies (25%), idiopathic OSA persisting after adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy (17%), and trisomy 21 (13%). Continuous positive airway pressure was effective in 81 patients (86%), in one patient it was unsuccessful, and in 12 patients compliance was inadequate. The median pressure required was 8 cm H2O (range, 4 to 20 cm H2O); pressure requirements were independent of age or diagnosis. Twenty-two percent of patients eventually required a modification of CPAP levels. Complications of CPAP were minor. Sixty-four percent of centers reported difficulty in obtaining funding for CPAP. Conclusions: Continuous positive airway pressure is safe, effective, and well tolerated by children and adolescents with OSA. Experience in infants is limited. As pressure requirements change with patient growth, we recommend that CPAP requirements be regularly reevaluated over time. The marked center-to-center variability in CPAP use suggests that specific indications for this therapy require clarification. (J PEDIATR 1995;127:88-94)

Section snippets

METHODS

Retrospective data on the use of CPAP in children were obtained from detailed questionnaires sent to 11 major pediatric sleep disorder centers (nine in the United States, one in Canada, and one in France). The questionnaires were answered by the medical directors. When necessary, further information was obtained by telephone. Patients using CPAP or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP, Respironics Inc., Murrysville, Pa.) (which provides different levels of inspiratory and expiratory

RESULTS

Responses were received from nine of the 11 centers. The remaining two centers were unable to furnish detailed information because of lack of records and were therefore not included in the study. Of these two centers, one reported following only a few patients; the other stated that it followed a large group of patients but could not provide exact numbers.

DISCUSSION

The combined experience of a number of major pediatric sleep disorder centers has shown that CPAP is safe and well tolerated by children and adolescents with OSA. The lack of persistent complications of OSA in this population and the small number of patients undergoing tracheostomy indicate that CPAP therapy is efficacious in the pediatric age group.

Continuous positive airway pressure has become available only recently; its first reported use was in 1981.13 Because of the relatively small

Acknowledgements

We thank Kathleen Bukowski for secretarial assistance. We also thank the many colleagues who assisted us in the preparation of this manuscript and in the clinical care of the patients, especially John Carroll, MD; G. Michael Davis, MBChB; Claude Gaultier, MD; Gerald M. Loughlin, MD; Jean M. Silvestri, MD; and Shelley Curtis, RN.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (251)

  • Hypoglossal nerve stimulation

    2023, Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children
  • Sleep in children with genetic disorders

    2023, Encyclopedia of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms: Volume 1-6, Second Edition
  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pediatric Patients

    2022, Sleep Medicine Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    There is limited evidence of the efficacy comparisons between CPAP and high-flow nasal cannula. As with adults on CPAP, children using CPAP frequently experience nasal bridge sores from masks, abdominal distention, mouth and nasal/pharyngeal dryness, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, epistaxis, eye irritation, and overall discomfort from air leaks, especially in the setting of a poorly fitting mask.13,24,44 These side effects can affect at least 30% of children after 5 months of use.52

  • Computational assessment of upper airway muscular activity in obstructive sleep apnea – In vitro validation

    2022, Journal of Biomechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Therefore, many factors that undermine airway patency are targets of OSA treatment. Treatment options include hypoglossal nerve stimulation of upper airway musculature (Strollo et al., 2014), surgical changes to address abnormal airway anatomy (Epstein et al., 2009; Marcus et al., 2012), and application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to pneumatically stent the upper airway open (Jordan et al., 2014; Marcus et al., 1995; Patil et al., 2019). Upper airway surgery is often a promising option, offering the possibility of OSA resolution postoperatively.

View all citing articles on Scopus

From Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Tulane University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana; Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois; McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Hôpital Antoine Beclere, Clamart, France; and Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio

☆☆

Supported in part by Clinical Associate Physician grant RR-00052, Pediatric Clinical Research Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md., and by an American Lung Association of Maryland research grant (Dr. Marcus).

Reprint requests: Carole L. Marcus, MBBCh, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Eudowood Division of Pediatric Respiratory Sciences, Park 316, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287-2533.

★★

0022-3476/95/$3.00 + 0 9/20/63773

View full text