Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 38, Issue 2, August 1998, Pages 113-118
Resuscitation

Respiratory system compliance decreases after cardiopulmonary resuscitation and stomach inflation: impact of large and small tidal volumes on calculated peak airway pressure1

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00095-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate respiratory system compliance after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and subsequent stomach inflation. Further, we calculated peak airway pressure according to the different tidal volume recommendations of the European Resuscitation Council (7.5 ml/kg) and the American Heart Association (15 ml/kg) for ventilation of an unintubated cardiac arrest victim. After 4 min of ventricular fibrillation, and 6 min of CPR, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after defibrillation occurred in seven pigs. Respiratory system compliance was measured at prearrest, after ROSC, and after 2 and 4 l of stomach inflation in the postresuscitation phase; peak airway pressure was subsequently calculated. Before cardiac arrest the mean (±S.D.) respiratory system compliance was 30±3 ml/cm H2O, and decreased significantly (P<0.05) after ROSC to 24±5 ml/cm H2O, and further declined significantly to 18±4 ml/cm H2O after 2 l, and to 13±3 ml/cm H2O after 4 l of stomach inflation. At prearrest, the mean±S.D. calculated peak airway pressure according to European versus American guidelines was 9±1 versus 18±3 cm H2O, after ROSC 12±2 versus 23±4 cm H2O, and 15±2 versus 30±5 cm H2O after 2 l, and 22±6 versus 44±12 cm H2O after 4 l of stomach inflation. In conclusion, respiratory system compliance decreased significantly after CPR and subsequent induction of stomach inflation in an animal model with a wide open airway. This may have a significant impact on peak airway pressure and distribution of gas during ventilation of an unintubated patient with cardiac arrest.

Introduction

The distribution of ventilation volume between lungs and stomach in an unintubated patient with cardiac arrest depends on variables such as upper airway resistance, respiratory system compliance, and lower oesophageal sphincter pressure. Of equal importance are the differences in technique applied by the healthcare professional while performing basic or advanced airway support, such as head position, inspiratory flow rate and time, and especially, peak airway pressure. The combination of these variables determines gas distribution between the lungs and the oesophagus, and subsequently, the stomach 1, 2.

The respiratory system compliance deteriorates in an awake adult from ∼100 ml/cm H2O [3]to ∼50–65 ml/cm H2O 4, 5in anesthetized, paralyzed supine patients. In patients being resuscitated after prolonged periods of cardiac arrest, the respiratory system compliance further declined to 20 ml/cm H2O [6]. Lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in healthy humans is ∼20 cm H2O 7, 8, but recent observations in an animal model showed that this variable may decrease rapidly to 5 cm H2O within the first 5 min of an untreated cardiac arrest [9]. Thus, the respiratory mechanics of a cardiac arrest patient may render gastric inflation during basic life support very likely.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and subsequent gastric inflation on the respiratory system compliance in a laboratory investigation. Recently, the European Resuscitation Council recommended a decrease in the tidal volume during ventilation of an unintubated cardiac arrest victim from 15 ml/kg as recommended by the American Heart Association [10]to 7.5 ml/kg [11], partly in an effort to decrease peak airway pressure. Therefore, we further calculated peak airway pressure with tidal volumes recommended by both organizations in this model.

Section snippets

Surgical preparation and measurements

The experimental protocol used in this study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Utilization Committee of the study institution. This laboratory investigation was performed according to Utstein-style guidelines [12]on seven domestic swine weighing 35±2 kg. The pigs were anesthetized with 20 mg/kg i.m. ketamine, and were subsequently placed in the dorsal recumbent position. Body temperature was maintained with an external warming blanket at ∼38°C. An infusion of normal saline was initiated

Results

Arterial blood gases before cardiac arrest and hemodynamic variables were within the normal clinical range. ROSC occurred in all seven animals. There was an overall significant difference between the four peak airway pressure means (P<0.0001) and between the four respiratory system compliance means (P<0.0001). Paired comparison indicated that each peak airway pressure mean differed significantly (P<0.05) from every other peak airway pressure mean, and each respiratory system compliance mean

Discussion

This study demonstrates that respiratory system compliance may decrease significantly after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and induction of gastric inflation. Before cardiac arrest, respiratory system compliance in our animals was lower than in anaesthetized, paralyzed supine adults (∼30 vs. ∼50 ml/cm H2O), which is most likely to be due to absolute differences in body weight. Since a previous animal study showed that respiratory system compliance did not change significantly even after

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Paul B. Blanch B.S., R.R.T. for ideas, support and encouragement, and William J. Rush M.S. for his technical and surgical expertise. Supported, in part, by grant 91GIA/721 from the American Heart Association, Florida Affiliate; and the Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine, Norway.

References (28)

  • J.P Ornato et al.

    Measurement of ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

    Crit Care Med

    (1983)
  • Cohen SC. Pathogenesis of coffee-induced gastrointestinal symptoms. N Engl J Med...
  • H Ruben et al.

    Gastric inflation in relation to airway pressure

    Acta Anaesth Scand

    (1961)
  • Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care. Part II; adult basic life support

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1992)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Presented, in part, at the 71st Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Dallas, TX, November, 1998.

    View full text