Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 85, Issue 5, May 2014, Pages 617-622
Resuscitation

Clinical paper
Airway management and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome in the CARES registry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.02.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Optimal out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) airway management strategies remain unclear. We compared OHCA outcomes between patients receiving endotracheal intubation (ETI) versus supraglottic airway (SGA), and between patients receiving [ETI or SGA] and those receiving no advanced airway.

Methods

We studied adult OHCA in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES). Primary exposures were ETI, SGA, or no advanced prehospital airway placed. Primary outcomes were sustained ROSC, survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, and neurologically-intact survival to hospital discharge (cerebral performance category 1–2). Propensity scores characterized the probability of receiving ETI, SGA, or no advanced airway. We adjusted for Utstein confounders. Multivariable random effects regression accounted for clustering by EMS agency. We compared outcomes between (1) ETI vs. SGA, and (2) [no advanced airway] vs. [ETI or SGA].

Results

Of 10,691 OHCA, 5591 received ETI, 3110 SGA, and 1929 had no advanced airway. Unadjusted neurologically-intact survival was: ETI 5.4%, SGA 5.2%, no advanced airway 18.6%. Compared with SGA, ETI achieved higher sustained ROSC (OR 1.35; 95%CI 1.19–1.54), survival to hospital admission (1.36; 1.19–1.55), hospital survival (1.41; 1.14–1.76) and hospital discharge with good neurologic outcome (1.44; 1.10–1.88). Compared with [ETI or SGA], patients receiving no advanced airway attained higher survival to hospital admission (1.31; 1.16–1.49), hospital survival (2.96; 2.50–3.51) and hospital discharge with good neurologic outcome (4.24; 3.46–5.20).

Conclusion

In CARES, survival was higher among OHCA receiving ETI than those receiving SGA, and for patients who received no advanced airway than those receiving ETI or SGA.

Introduction

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health problem affecting over 300,000 persons in the United States each year.1 Airway management is a core element of OHCA resuscitation. In the United States, 80% of OHCA resuscitations receive prehospital airway management, and the most common advanced airway intervention is endotracheal intubation (ETI).

Supraglottic airways (SGA) such as the Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube (ETC), Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and King Laryngeal Tube (King LT), offer an alternative approach to advanced airway management. There is growing enthusiasm for the use of SGA insertion during OHCA resuscitation due to its simpler insertion versus ETI. Many EMS personnel choose primary SGA insertion to avoid interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation chest compression continuity.2, 3 Despite the growing out-of-hospital use of SGA, there have been relatively few comparisons of OHCA outcomes between patients receiving ETI and those receiving SGA insertion.4 More recently, select studies have even suggested improved survival without the insertion of any advanced airway device in OHCA.5

The Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) Surveillance Group is the largest multi-site network characterizing OHCA care and outcomes in North America.6 In the present study, we sought to evaluate the impact of EMS airway management strategy upon outcomes after OHCA in CARES. Specifically, we compared OHCA outcomes between patients receiving endotracheal intubation (ETI) versus supraglottic airway (SGA), and between patients receiving [ETI or SGA] and those receiving no advanced airway.

Section snippets

Study design and setting

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Cincinnati and the University of Alabama at Birmingham. We conducted a secondary analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) registry.

Data source

CARES is a multicenter registry of OHCA episodes from across the United States.7 Currently, over 400 EMS agencies from 40 communities and 10 state-based registries contribute data to CARES. These agencies serve a total

Results

During the study period there were 12,875 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests reported by CARES EMS agencies. We excluded 256 children <18 years old and 83 where age was unknown. We excluded an additional 1847 where the EMS agency did not provide airway management information. Of the remaining 10,691 adult OHCA patients, over 80% underwent successful insertion of an advanced airway device. (Table 1) Among patients receiving an advanced airway, approximately two-thirds received ETI and one-third

Discussion

Our findings in this analysis of a large, multi-center US-based registry of OHCA are similar to those published previously and provide more support to the associations between prehospital airway management choices and ultimate neurologically-intact survival. OHCA in the CARES network receiving no advanced airway exhibited superior outcomes than those receiving ETI or SGA. When an advanced airway was used, ETI was associated with improved outcomes compared to SGA.

Many EMS practitioners consider

Conclusion

In the CARES network, survival was higher among OHCA receiving ETI than those receiving SGA. Survival was markedly higher among patients who received no advanced airway than those receiving endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway placement.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (138)

  • Demographic disparities in tracheal intubation success rates during infant out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

    2023, Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is worth noting there is ongoing controversy as to the preferred strategy for airway management in cardiac arrest in both adult and pediatric patients [29,30]. Results from a number of studies have shown conflicting results as to whether tracheal intubation is associated with improved outcomes [8,9,31–37]. The aim of our study is not to make a claim that tracheal intubation ought to be the preferred cardiac arrest airway strategy.

View all citing articles on Scopus

A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.02.007.

View full text