Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

To tube or not to tube babies with respiratory distress syndrome

Abstract

The use of mechanical ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and respiratory failure often results in barotrauma, volutrauma and chronic lung disease (CLD). Research indicates that early surfactant therapy and initiation of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for these infants significantly reduces the need for mechanical ventilation and the incidence of CLD. Different CPAP delivery systems exist, each with some practical and clinical advantages and disadvantages. Clinical trials indicate that optimal management of neonatal RDS could be improved by early surfactant treatment followed immediately by extubation and stabilization on CPAP. Evidence suggests a synergistic effect between early surfactant administration (within 2 h of birth) and rapid extubation to nasal CPAP with a significant reduction in the need for mechanical ventilation and its associated morbidities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stevens TP, Blennow M, Soll RF . Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (3), Art. No.: CD003063. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003063.pub2.

  2. Ramanathan R, Sekar K, Soll RF, Wung JT . Expert opinions in managing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: focus on noninvasive ventilation strategies. {Pamphlet}. Publisher: Annenberg Center For Health Sciences at Eisenhower. Available at www.5starmeded.org/shared/4399.pdf (accessed 2006 September 4) 2005.

  3. Coalson JJ . Pathology of new bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Neonatol 2003; 8: 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Marter LJ, Allred EN, Pagano M, Sanocka RP, Parad R, Moore M et al. Do clinical markers of barotrauma and oxygen toxicity explain interhospital variation in rates of chronic lung disease? Pediatrics 2000; 105: 1194–1201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Whitehead T, Slutsky AS . The pulmonary physician in critical care-7. Ventilator induced lung injury. Thorax 2002; 57: 635–642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson MJ, Maayan C, Eyal FG, Armon Y, Bar-Yishay E, Godfrey S . Does the pattern of ventilation determine the degree of lung damage following intensive care of the newborn? Isr J Med Sci 1982; 18: 835–839.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Speer CP . Inflammation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Neonatol 2003; 8: 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jobe AH, Kramer BW, Moss TJ, Newnham JP, Ikegami M . Decreased indicators of lung injury with continuous positive expiratory pressure in preterm lams. Pediatr Res 2002; 52: 387–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Latini G, De Felice C, Presta G, Rosati E, Vacca P . Minimal handling and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely low-birth-weight infants. Eur J Pediatr 2003; 162: 227–229.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Castillo A, Sola A, Baquero H, Neira F, Alvis R, Deulofeur R et al. Pulse oxygen saturation levels and arterial oxygen tension values in newborns receiving oxygen therapy in the neonatal intensive are unit: Is 85% to 93% an acceptable range? Pediatrics 2008; 121: 882–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gal P, Shaffer CL . Acute respiratory distress syndrome In: DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC (eds). Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach. 5th edn. McGraw-Hill: New York, 2002, pp 531–538.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK . Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med 1971; 284: 1333–1340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunn PM, Thearle MJ, Parsons AC, Watts JL . Use of the ‘Gregory box’ (CPAP) in treatment of RDS of the newborn: preliminary report. Arch Dis Child 1972; 47: 674–675.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirby R, Robison E, Schulz J, DeLemos RA . Continuous-flow ventilation as an alternative to assisted or controlled ventilation in infants. Anesth Analg 1972; 51: 871–875.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mulrooney N, Champion Z, Moss TJ, Nitsos I, Ikegami M, Jobe AH . Surfactant and physiologic responses of preterm lambs to continuous positive airway pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 488–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aly HZ . Nasal prongs continuous positive airway pressure: a simple yet powerful tool. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 759–761.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. DePaoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B, Morley CJ . Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (4), Art. No.: CD002977.

  18. Kahn DJ, Courtney SE, Steele AM, Habib RH . Unpredictability of delivered bubble nasal continuous positive airway pressure; role of bias flow magnitude and nares-prong air leaks. Pediatr Res 2007; 62: 343–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Polin RA, Sahni R . Continuous positive airway pressure: Old questions and new controversies. J Neonatal Perinat Med 2008; 1: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pandit PB, Courtney SE, Pyon KH, Saslow JG, Habib RH . Work of breathing during constant- and variable-flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 682–685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blennow M, Jonsson B, Dahlstrom A, Sarman I, Bohlin K, Robertson B . Lung function in premature infants can be improved. Surfactant therapy and CPAP reduce the need of respiratory support. Lakartidningen 1999; 96: 1571–1576.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Verder H, Robertson B, Greisen G, Ebbesen F, Albertsen P, Lundstrom K et al. Surfactant therapy and nasal continuous positive airway pressure for newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1051–1055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Verder H, Albertsen P, Ebbesen F, Greisen G, Robertson B, Bertelsen A et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and early surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in newborns of less than 30 weeks' gestation. Pediatrics 1999; 103: E24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reininger A, Khala R, Kendig JW, Ryan RM, Stevens TP, Reubens L et al. Surfactant administration by transient intubation in infants 29 to 35 weeks' gestation with respiratory distress syndrome decreases the likelihood of later mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol 2005; 25: 703–708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dani C, Bertini G, Pezzati M, Cecchi A, Caviglioli C, Rubaltelli FF . Early extubation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation. Pediatrics 2004; 113: e560–e563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haberman B, Shankaran S, Stevenson DK, Papile LA, Stark A, Korones S et al. Does surfactant and immediate extubation to nasal continuous positive airway pressure reduce use of mechanical ventilation? Pediatr Res 2002; 51: 349A.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tooley J, Dyke M . Randomized study of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the preterm infant with respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr 2003; 92 (10): 1170–1174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Soll RF, Conner JM, Howard D, the Investigators of the Early Surfactant Replacement Study. Early surfactant replacement in spontaneously breathing premature infants with RDS. http://www.pas-meeting.org/2003Seattle/Abstracts/LBFullAbs.htm. PAS2003: LB12.

  29. Texas Neonatal Research Group. Early surfactant for mild to moderate RDS. J Pediatr 1004; 114: 804–808.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sandri F, Ancora G, Lanzoni A, Tagliabue P, Colnaghi M, Ventura ML et al. Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airway pressure in newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation; multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: 394–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stevens TI, Blennow M, Soll RF . Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (2), Art. No.: CD 003063. DOI:10.1002/14651858. CD003063.pub3.

  32. Booth C, Premkumar MH, Yannoulis A, Thomson M, Harrison M, Edwards AD . Sustainable use of continuous positive airway pressure in extremely preterm infants during the first week after delivery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: 398–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ammari A, Suri M, Milisavljevic V, Sahni R, Bateman D, Sanocka U et al. Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 2005; 147: 341–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ehrenkranz RA, Walsh MC, Vohr BR, Jobe AH, Wright LL, Fanaroff AA et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Definition of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 1353–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Narendran V, Donovan EF, Hoath SB, Akinbi HT, Steichen JJ, Jobe AH . Early bubble CPAP and outcomes in ELBW preterm infants. J Perinatol 2003; 23: 195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Finer NN, Carlo WA, Duara S, Fanaroff AA, Donovan EF, Wright LL et al. Delivery room continuous positive airway pressure/positive end-expiratory pressure in extremely low birth weight infants: a feasibility trial. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 651–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Aly H, Milner JD, Patel K, El-Mohandes AA . Does the experience with the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure improve over time in extremely low birth weight infants? Pediatrics 2004; 114: 697–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB . Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (7): 700–708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Adamkin DH . Pragmatic approach to in-hospital nutrition in high-risk neonates. J Perinatol 2005; 25: S7–S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sekar KC . The role of continuous positive airway pressure therapy in the management of respiratory distress in extremely premature infants. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2006; 11: 145–152.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K C Sekar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sekar, K., Corff, K. To tube or not to tube babies with respiratory distress syndrome. J Perinatol 29 (Suppl 2), S68–S72 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.28

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.28

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links