Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Crossover Trial Comparing Pressure Support With Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare pressure support ventilation (PSV) with volume guarantee (VG) to synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) in infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, crossover study design was used. We enrolled 14 infants [BW (mean±SD) 2.5±0.7 kg, GA 34±2 weeks, age 49±26 hours]. Subjects received 4 hours of each mode of ventilation, with the first mode selected randomly. End expiratory volume (EEV) was measured during both ventilatory modes.

RESULTS: Minute ventilation was greater with PSV+VG than with SIMV (p=0.012). This occurred despite no difference in paCO2. Mean airway pressure was higher during PSV+VG (p=0.023). There was no difference in the arterial/alveolar oxygen tension (a/A) ratio or in the specific dynamic compliance (sCdyn).

CONCLUSION: Because of an increase in VE with PSV+VG, and no difference in the a/A ratio or sCdyn, we do not recommend the routine use of PSV+VG for this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Giffin F, Chan V . Synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation modes compared with patient-triggered ventilation during weaning Arch Dis Child 1995 72: F188–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlton DP, Cummings JJ, Scheerer RG . Lung over expansion increases pulmonary microvascular protein permeability in young lambs J Appl Physiol 1990 69: 577–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsuno K, Minura K, Takeya M . Histopathologic pulmonary changes from mechanical ventilation at high peak airway pressure Am Rev Respir Dis 1991 143: 1115–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dreyfuss D, Saumon G . Role of tidal volume, FRC, and end-inspiratory volume in the development of pulmonary edema following mechanical ventilation Am Rev Respir Dis 1993 148: 1194–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Herrera CM, Gerhardt T, Everett R, Claure N, Musante G, Bancalari E . Randomized, crossover study of volume guarantee versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants recovering from respiratory failure Pediatr Res 1999 45: 304 (Abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keszler M, Abubakar KM . Volume targeted mechanical ventilation of newborns maintains more stable tidal volume but does not prevent hypocarbia in the first 24 hours of life Pediatr Res 1999 45: 307A (Abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrera CM, Gerhardt T, Everett R, Claure N, Thomas C, Bancalari E . Volume guarantee ventilation with two different tidal volumes versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants. A randomized crossover study Pediatr Res 2000 47: 361A (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mrozek JD, Bendel-Stenzel EM, Meyers PA, Bing DR, Connett JE, Mammel MC . Randomized controlled trial of volume-targeted synchronized ventilation and conventional intermittent mandatory ventilation following initial exogenous surfactant therapy Pediatr Pulmonol 2000 29: 11–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Krauss AN, Auld PAM . Measurement of functional residual capacity in distressed neonates by helium rebreathing J Pediatr 1970 77: 228–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Da Silva WJ, Abbasi S, Pereira G, Bhutani VK . Role of positive end-expiratory pressure changes on functional residual capacity in surfactant treated preterm infants Pediatr Pulmonol 1994 18: 89–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis JM, Veness-Meeham K, Notter RH, Bhutani VK, Kendig JW, Shapiro DL . Changes in pulmonary mechanics after administration of surfactant to infants with respiratory distress syndrome N Engl J Med 1988 319: 476–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldsmith LS, Greenspan JS, Rubenstein D, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH . Immediate improvement in lung volume after exogenous surfactant: alveolar recruitment versus increased distension J Pediatr 1991 119: 424–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Kavadia V . Changes in lung volume, compliance and oxygenation in the first 48 hours of life in infants given surfactant J Perinat Med 1997 25: 49–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fox WW, Schwartz JG, Shaffer TH . Effects of endotracheal tube leaks on functional residual capacity determination in intubated neonates Pediatr Res 1979 13: 60–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson P, Wyman ML, Jung AL . Functional residual capacity and severity of respiratory distress syndrome in infants Crit Care Med 1980 8: 637–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kavvadia V, Greenough A, Dimitrious G . Prediction of extubation failure in preterm neonates Eur J Pediatr 2000 159: 227–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kavvadia V, Greenough A, Dimitrious G . Early prediction of chronic oxygen dependency by lung function test results Pediatr Pulmonol 2000 29: 19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hotchkiss JR Jr, Adams AB, Stone MK, Dries DJ, Marini JJ, Crooke PS . Oscillations and noise. Inherent instability of pressure support ventilation? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002 165: 47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boker A, Graham MR, Walley KR et al. Improved arterial oxygenation with biologically variable or fractal ventilation using low tidal volumes in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002 165: 456–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the assistance in statistical analysis offered by Stephen Simon, PhD, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine (Kansas City, MO). Supported by Children's Mercy Hospital Research and Education Award (S. L. O.), Children's Mercy Hospital Physician Scientist Award (W. E. T.), and computer software upgrade support from Drager.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was presented at Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting, Baltimore, MD, 2001.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olsen, S., Thibeault, D. & Truog, W. Crossover Trial Comparing Pressure Support With Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation. J Perinatol 22, 461–466 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210772

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210772

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links