Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

A Prospective Observational Pilot Study of Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (SNIPPV) as a Primary Mode of Ventilation in Infants ≥ 28 Weeks with Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)

Journal of Perinatology volume 24, pages 487–493 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) who were extubated to synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) or continued on conventional ventilation (CV), immediately postsurfactant.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study of postsurfactant ventilatory management of consecutive infants (born between 10/99 and 12/02) of 28 to 34 weeks gestation. Extubation to SNIPPV was at the attending neonatologists' discretion. Babies in the CV group remained intubated, postsurfactant.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the maternal demographics, antenatal steroid use, mode of delivery, birth weight (BW), gestational age (GA), gender, Apgar at 5 minutes, age at surfactant instillation, or oxygenation index (OI) prior to surfactant administration, between infants continued on CV (n=35) and those extubated to SNIPPV (n=24). The total duration of endotracheal intubation (mean±SEM; CV versus SNIPPV; 2.4±0.4 versus 0.3±0.0 days, p=0.001) and duration of supplemental oxygen exposure (15±3.2 versus 8.2±3.3 days, p=0.04) were significantly shorter in the SNIPPV group. Furthermore, the duration of parenteral nutrition (12.1±1.6 versus 8.4±0.8 days, p=0.02) and length of stay (37.5±3.0 versus 29.1±3.3 days, p=0.04) were also significantly shorter in the SNIPPV group. There were no differences between the two groups in blood gas or OI values postsurfactant (up to 48 hours). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage grade I (three (9%) in the CV group and two infants (8%) in the SNIPPV group). No infant died in either group or had patent ductus arteriosus, air leaks, necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity or bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS: Infants of 28 to 34 weeks GA with RDS requiring surfactant with early extubation to SNIPPV had a shorter duration of intubation, and decreased need for oxygen as compared to CV. There was also a significant decrease in the duration of parenteral nutrition and hospitalization. SNIPPV is a safe and effective primary mode of ventilation in larger premature infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mathews TJ, Menacker F, MacDorman MF . Infant mortality statistics from the 2000 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2002;50:1–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Northway Jr WH . Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: thirty–three years later. Pediatr Pulmonol 2001;23(Suppl):5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhandari A, Bhandari V . Pathogenesis, pathology, and pathophysiology of pulmonary sequelae of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants. Front Biosci 2003;8:e370–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhandari V . High frequency ventilation in premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: does it make a difference?. In: Singhi S, editor. Current Concepts in Pediatric Intensive Care. Chandigarh: Relume Printec; 2000 p. 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson AH, Peacock JL, Greenough A, et al. United Kingdom Oscillation Study Group. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity. N Engl J Med 2002;347:633–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Courtney SE, Durand DJ, Asselin JM, et al. Neonatal Ventilation Study Group. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2002;347:643–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Craft AP, Bhandari V, Finer NN . The sy-fi study: a randomized prospective trial of synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus a high-frequency flow interrupter in infants less than 1000 g. J Perinatol 2003;23:14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, Bhandari V . A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics 2001;108:13–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Verder H, Robertson B, Greisen G, et al. Surfactant therapy and nasal continuous positive airway pressure for newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1051–1055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gittermann M, Fusch C, Gittermann A, Regazzoni B, Moessinger A . Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment reduces the need for intubation in very low birthweight infants. Eur J Pediatr 1997;156:384–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Verder H, Albertsen P, Ebbesen F, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and early surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in newborns less than 30 weeks gestation. Pediatrics 1998;103:e24 http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/103/2/e24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamper J, Wulff K, Larsen C, Lindequist S . Early treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in very low-birth-weight infants. Acta Paediatr 1993;82:193–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedlich P, Lecart C, Posen R, Ramicone E, Chan L, Ramanathan R . A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal-synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in very low birth weight infants after extubation. J Perinatol 1999;19:413–418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN . Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2001;107:638–641.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H . Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with weight less than 1500 grams. J Pediatr 1978;92:529–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Volpe JJ . Hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy: neuropathology and pathogenesis. In: Neurology of the Newborn. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1987 p. 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shennan AT, Dunn MS, Ohlsson A, Lennox K, Hoskins EM . Abnormal pulmonary outcomes in premature infants: prediction from oxygen requirement in neonatal period. Pediatrics 1988;82:527–532.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bell MJ . Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis therapeutic decisions based on clinical staging. Ann Surg 1978;187:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Anonymous. An international classification for retinopathy of prematurity. The Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1130–1134.

  20. Santin R, Brodsky N, Bhandari V . A comparison of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) versus conventional ventilation (CV) immediately after surfactant instillation in infants with RDS. Pediatr Res 2002;51:337A (Abstract No. 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heimler R, Hoffmann RG, Starshak RJ, Sasidharan P, Grausz JP . Chronic lung disease in premature infants: a retrospective evaluation of underlying factors. Crit Care Med 1988;12:1213–12177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr 1996;129:63–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Lemyre B . Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:70–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson JK, Vellucci J, Johnson P, Kilbride HW . Evidence-based approach to change in clinical practice: introduction of expanded nasal continuous positive airway pressure use in an intensive care nursery. Pediatrics 2003;111:e542–e547. URL: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/111/4/e542.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kiciman NM, Andreasson B, Bernstein G, et al. Thoracoabdominal motion in newborns during ventilation delivered by endotracheal tube or nasal prongs. Pediatr Pulmonol 1998;25:175–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moretti C, Gizzi C, Papoff P, et al. Comparing the effects of nasal synchronized intermittent positive pressure ventilation (nSIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) after extubation in very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 1999;56:167–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the other attending neonatologists at the Albert Einstein Medical Center NICU (Drs. Hallam Hurt, Rachel Porat, Mohammed Riaz, Agnes Salvador, Michael Szatkowski) for their support of the study. We also thank Drs. Richard Ehrenkranz and Anita Bhandari for their review of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Nancy Brodsky PhD

    Present address: Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Rene Santin MD, Nancy Brodsky PhD & Vineet Bhandari MD, DM

Authors
  1. Rene Santin MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nancy Brodsky PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vineet Bhandari MD, DM
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santin, R., Brodsky, N. & Bhandari, V. A Prospective Observational Pilot Study of Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (SNIPPV) as a Primary Mode of Ventilation in Infants ≥ 28 Weeks with Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS). J Perinatol 24, 487–493 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211131

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211131

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links